中国临床心理学杂志

幸福具有客观性吗？幸福的来源和主观体验的一致性

作者：陈世民张莹孙配贞

单位：1. 中国矿业大学公共管理学院徐州 221116 2. 德国柏林自由大学德国柏林 3. 江苏师范大学教育科学学院徐州 221116

分类号：R395.6

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(5):915-918

摘要：

目的：从幸福的来源与主观体验的一致性角度进一步探讨幸福的客观性。方法：对716名大学生和381名成人采用自我实现问卷、个人成长分量表、需要满足问卷和幸福情绪体验问卷进行调查。采用潜在剖面分析而不是预先设置值对被试进行分类。结果：大学生样本分为4个潜类别，分别命名为低幸福者、中等幸福者、高幸福者和最高幸福者；成人样本分为3个潜类别，分别命名为较低幸福者、中等幸福者和高幸福者。方差分析表明幸福的来源的水平越高者，其自我实现体验、需要满足体验越高、消极情绪水平越低。结论：幸福的来源与主观体验的水平总体一致，此结果与Keyes等的研究结果不同。

Objective: This study intends to explore the objectivity of well-being by exploring the consistency between the sources and the subjective experience of well-being. Methods: Two samples of 716 college students and 381 adults completed Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being, Personal Growth Subscale from Psychological Well-being Scale, Need Satisfaction Questionnaire and Emotional Experience of Well-being Questionnaire. Latent profile analysis was used to determine the classes of participants instead of grouping based on predetermined cut-off scores. Results: College stu-dents were classified into four classes and were named low, medium, high, and the highest well-being class. Adults were classified into three classes and were named low, medium, and high well-being classes. ANOVA showed that the higher the level of objective source of well-being was, the higher the eudaimonia-related experience and satisfaction-related experi-ence were, and the lower negative emotion was. Conclusion: The sources and the subjective experience of well-being are consistent.

基金项目：

中央高校基本科研业务费社会科学基金(2014WA05)；江苏省高等教育教改研究课题(2015JSJG159)；江苏省高校“青蓝工程”资助项目(2017)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Diener E. Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, 95(3):542-575
2 苗元江. 心理学视野中的幸福. 天津:天津人民出版社, 2009. 291
3 高良, 郑雪, 严标宾. 当代幸福感研究的反思与整合——幸福感三因素模型的初步建构. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 5:129-136
4 Uchida Y, Norasakkunkit V, Kitayama S. Cultural constructions of happiness:theory and emprical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2004, 5(3):223-239
5 Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 57(6):1069-1081
6 Waterman AS, et al. The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being:Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2010, 5(1):41-61
7 Deci EL, Ryan RM. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits:Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 2000, 11(4):227-268
8 Grinde B. Happiness in the Perspective of Evolutionary Psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2002, 3:331-353
9 Kenrick DT, et al. Renovating the pyramid of needs contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2010, 5(3):292-314
10 Keyes CLM, Shmotkin D, Ryff CD. Optimizing well-being:The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82(6):1007-1022
11 DeMartini KS, Fucito LM. Variations in sleep characteristics and sleep-related impairment in at-risk college drinkers:A latent profile analysis. Health Psychology, 2014, 33(10):1164-1173
12 Vannucci A, et al. Latent profile analysis to determine the typology of Disinhibited Eating Behaviors in children and adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2013, 81(3):494-507
13 崔春华, 李春晖, 王欣, 杨海荣. Ryff 心理幸福感量表在河北师范大学生中的试用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2005, 19(2):128-130
14 陈世民, 李旭, 郑雪. 单维还是二维?幸福的积极情绪结构探讨. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2017, 25(1):92-96
15 Fritz CO, Morris PE, Richler JJ. Effect size estimates:Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 2012, 141(1):2-18
16 Kitayama S, Park H. Cultural Shaping of Self, Emotion, and Well-Being:How Does It Work?. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2007, 1(1):202-222

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】