中国临床心理学杂志

微信对被排斥者的补偿作用

作者：胡维杨林川吕厚超李晔

单位：1. 西南大学心理学部重庆 400715 2. 三峡大学文学与传媒学院宜昌 443002 3. 华中师范大学心理学院武汉 430079

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(5):810-813

摘要：

目的：探讨微信能否恢复被排斥者受损的基本心理需求，减少补偿行为。方法：采用2（网络掷球处理：排斥VS.接纳）×2（图标呈现：微信VS.爱奇艺）组间设计，社会排斥的操作采用网络掷球范式，社交媒体图标呈现的操纵将微信图标呈现作为实验组，爱奇艺图标呈现作为控制组，因变量测量为社会交往意愿。结果：呈现爱奇艺图标时，被排斥被试比被接纳被试表现出更强的社会交往意愿。而呈现微信图标时，被排斥被试和被接纳被试表现的社会交往意愿无显著差异。结论：微信能起到对被排斥被试的补偿作用，减少补偿行为。

Objective: To discuss whether WeChat can restore excluded participants' fundamental psychological needs, and reduce their compensatory behavior. Methods: Using 2(Cyberball experience:exclusion VS. inclusion)*2(icon presen-tation:WeChat VS. iQIYI) between groups design, the Cyberball paradigm was applied in this experiment, participants were randomly assigned to the exclusion condition or the inclusion condition. Afterwards, a WeChat icon or an iQIYI icon(a con-trol icon) was presented on the margin of a computer screen during a filler task. Finally, participants'interest in social con-tact was measured. Results: When exposed to the iQIYI icon, excluded participants showed greater interest in social con-tact. This effect disappeared after the subtle presentation of WeChat icon. Conclusion: WeChat may have a compensatory effect on excluded participants, and reduce their compensatory behavior.

基金项目：

国家社会科学基金一般项目(14BSH080)；留学回国人员科研启动基金（情节式未来思考的认知神经机制研究）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金重大培育项目(SWU1509389)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Anderson B, Fagan P, Woodnutt T, et al. Facebook psychology:Popular questions answered by research. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2012, 1(1):23-37
2 Lien CH, Cao Y. Examining WeChat users'motivations, trust, attitudes, and positive word-of-mouth:Evidence from China. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 41:104-111
3 Sheldon KM, Abad N, Hinsch C. A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction:Disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011, 100(4):766-775
4 Baumeister RF, Twenge JM, Nuss CK. Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes:Anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 83(4):817-827
5 Buckley KE, Winkel RE, Leary MR. Reactions to acceptance and rejection:Effects of level and sequence of relational evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2004, 40(1):14-28
6 Chow RM, Tiedens LZ, Govan CL. Excluded emotions:The role of anger in antisocial responses to ostracism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2008, 44(3):896-903
7 Mendes WB, Major B, McCoy S, et al. How attributional ambiguity shapes physiological and emotional responses to social rejection and acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2008, 94(2):278-291
8 Twenge JM, Baumeister RF, DeWall CN, et al. Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 92(1):56-66
9 Williams KD, Nida SA. Ostracism:Consequences and Coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2011, 20 (2):71-75
10 Echterhoff G, Higgins ET, Levine JM. Shared Reality:Experiencing commonality with others'inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2009, 4(5):496-521
11 Maner JK, DeWall CN, Baumeister RF. Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the "porcupine problem". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 92(1):42-55
12 Knowles ML, Haycock N, Shaikh I. Does Facebook magnify or mitigate threats to belonging? Social Psychology, 2015, 46 (6):313-324
13 Knausenberger J, Hellmann JH, Echterhoff G. When virtual contact is all you need:Subtle reminders of Facebook preempt social-contact restoration after exclusion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2015, 45(3):279-284
14 iiMedia. Statistics. Retrieved from:http://www.iimedia.cn/41439.html (accessed on March 30, 2016)
15 Williams KD, Cheung CKT, Choi W. Cyberostracism:Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 79(5):748-762
16 Uskul AK, Over H. Responses to social exclusion in cultural context:Evidence from farming and herding communities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2014, 106(5):752-771
17 Over H, Uskul AK. Culture moderates children's responses to ostracism situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2016, 110(5):710-724
18 李森, 刘盼盼, 张登浩. 单独受排斥与共同受排斥对个体基本需要的损害. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24(6):980-984

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】