中国临床心理学杂志

中国文化背景下魅力型领导对关系绩效的影响：尽责性与工作投入的链式中介作用

作者：陈世民孙配贞段鑫星

单位：1. 中国矿业大学公共管理学院徐州 221116 2. 江苏师范大学教育科学学院徐州 221116

分类号：R395.6

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(4):747-749

摘要：

目的：探讨中国文化背景下魅力型领导对关系绩效的影响机制。方法：采用魅力型领导量表、大五人格问卷的尽责性分量表、Utrecht工作投入量表和关系绩效问卷对319名员工进行调查。采用偏差校正的非参数百分位Bootstrap方法进行链式中介效应检验。结果：尽责性在魅力型领导与关系绩效间的简单中介效果量为46.0%，尽责性和工作投入在两者间的总中介效果量为74.4%。结论：尽责性和工作投入在魅力型领导与关系绩效间起链式中介作用。

Objective: This study intended to explore how charismatic leadership affect contextual performance in Chinese cultural context. Methods: A sample of 319 employees completed Charismatic Leadership Scale, Conscientiousness Subscale from NEO-PI-R(short Form), Utrecht Work Engagement Scale and Contextual Performance Questionnaire. Biascorrected Nonparametric Percentile Bootstrap Method was used to test the chain medication effect. Results: Conscientiousness mediated the effect of charismatic leadership on contextual performance with the simple effect size of 46.0%; conscientiousness and work engagement mediated the relationship between charismatic leadership and contextual performance with the total effect size of 74.4%. Conclusion: Conscientiousness and work engagement chain mediates the relationship between charismatic leadership and contextual performance with high explained variance.

基金项目：

中央高校基本科研业务费社会科学基金（2014WA05）；江苏省高等教育教改研究课题（2015JSJG159）；江苏省高校“青蓝工程”资助项目（2017）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Wilderom CPM, Berg PT, Wiersma UJ. A longitudinal study of the effects of charismatic leadership and organizational culture on objective and perceived corporate performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 2012, 23(5):835-848
2 Babcock-Roberson ME, Strickland OJ. The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Journal of Psychology, 2010, 144(3):313-326
3 Pradhan S, Pradhan RK. An empirical investigation of relationship among transformational leadership, affective organizational commitment and contextual performance. Vision, 2015, 19(3):227-235
4 English T, Chen S. Culture and self-concept stability:Consistency across and within contexts among Asian Americans and European Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 93(3):478-490
5 宋继文, 孙志强, 孟慧. 变革型领导的中介变量:一个整合的视角. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(1):147-157
6 杨春江, 冯秋龙, 田子州. 变革型领导与员工任务绩效:主动性人格和领导-成员交换的作用. 管理工程学报, 2015, 29(1):39-46
7 姚春序, 刘艳林. 魅力型领导与下属工作投入:双维认同构念的中介机制. 心理科学, 2013, 36(4):942-948
8 张伟明, 夏洪胜. 魅力型领导、下属的信任与团队创新绩效关系的研究. 科技管理研究, 2011, 8:109-112
9 Jawahar IM, Carr D. Conscientiousness and contextual performance:The compensatory effects of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2007, 22(4):330-349
10 Avis JM, Kudisch JD, Fortunato VJ. Examining the incremental validity and adverse impact of cognitive ability and conscientiousness on job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2002, 17(1):87-105
11 Judge TA, et al. Hierarchical representations of the FiveFactor Model of Personality in predicting job performance:Integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2013, 98(6):875-925
12 李伟. 内在动机对关系绩效的影响机制及强化条件. 科研管理, 2014, 35(5):77-83
13 Taylor AB, MacKinnon DP, Tein JY. Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods, 2008, 11 (2):241-269
14 戴晓阳, 等. NEO 个性问卷修订本在中国的应用研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2004, 18(3):171-174
15 张轶文,甘怡群. 中文版 Utrecht 工作投入量表(UWES)的信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2005, 13(3):268-270
16 王辉, 李晓轩, 罗胜强. 任务绩效与情境绩效二因素绩效模型的验证. 中国管理科学, 2003, 11(4):79-84

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】