中国临床心理学杂志

基于展开反应机制的人格量表编制：以大学生性格倾向量表为例

作者：邓远平戴海琦罗晓

单位：1. 集美大学教师教育学院厦门 361021 2. 江西师范大学心理学院南昌 330022

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(3):457-462

摘要：

目的：基于拓广等级展开模型（简称GGUM）编制大学生性格倾向量表（简称CTS-GGUM），并与基于因素分析方法构建的量表（简称CTS-FA）进行比较，探索基于展开反应机制编制人格量表的可行性。方法：根据三所大学1209名有效被试的作答数据，分别基于GGUM与因素分析方法进行量表编制并作比较。结果：CTS-GGUM保留了更多的中段项目，内容效度为0.718，效标关联效度为0.699，同质性信度为0.740，其中同质信度与效标关联效度略低于CTS-FA。结论：基于展开反应机制编制人格量表具有可行性，它有更好的被试区分能力，并能提高特质中段被试的测量精度。

Objective: Developing character tendency scale for undergraduates based on GGUM(CTS-GGUM) and comparing it with scale based on factor analysis method(CTS-FA) in order to explore the feasibility of developing personality scale based on unfording response mechanism. Methods: Developing CTS-FA and CTS-GGUM based on 1209 valid subjects and comparing their performance metrics. Results: CTS-GGUM retained items located in the middle range of trait, its coefficient was 0.718 for content validity, 0.699 for criterion related validity and 0.740 for homogeneity reliability, the latter two were slightly lower than CTS-FA. Conclusion: Developing personality scale based on unfording response mechanism is feasible, it has a better distinguish ability and improves measurement accuracy of subjects in the middle section of the trait.

基金项目：

集美大学博士启动基金项目：基于项目反应理论（IRT）展开模型的人格量表编制研究（Q201408）；福建省教育厅社科类项目：人格量表编制的三种方法比较（JAS14166）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Thurstone LL. The Measurement of Values. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press, 1959
2 Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Chan K, et al. Fitting item response theory models to two personality inventories:Issues and insights. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2001, 36:523-562
3 Stark S, Chernyshenko OS, Drasgow F, Williams BA. Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment:Should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(1):25-39
4 Chernyshenko OS, Stark S, Drasgow F, et al. Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process:Toward increasing theflexibility of personality measures. Psychological Assessment, 2007, 19(1):88
5 Mangos PM, Johnston JH. Applying unfolding item re-spone theory to enhance measurement of cultural norms. Papers presented at the RTO human factors and medicinepanel (HFM) symposium held in Copenhagen. Denmark, 2008. 32-35
6 邓稳根, 戴海琦, 黄海, 戴慧群. 展开模型对EPQ反应数据的拟合调查. 心理与行为研究, 2009, 4:300-303, 311
7 郭庆科, 陈英敏, 孟庆茂. 自陈量表式测验应用 IRT 的可行性. 心理学报, 2005, 2:275-279
8 方平, 邓希冯, 姜媛. 展开模型和优势模型在职业兴趣测验中的比较研究. 心理学探新, 2012, 5:447-453, 460
9 范晓玲, 吴志勇, 韩喆. IRT展开模型在"大学生学习自主性量表"中的应用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(3):333-336
10 Roberts J, Donoghue J, Laughlin J. A general item response theory model for unfolding unidimensional polytomous responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2000, 24:27-32
11 漆书青, 戴海崎. 项目反应理论及其应用研究. 南昌:江西高校出版社, 1992. 56
12 Roberts JS, Shim HS. GGUM2004 technical reference manual. Version, 2004
13 Van Schuur, Henk AL Kiers. Why factor analysis often is the incorrect model for analyzing bipolar concepts, and what model to use instead. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1994, 18(2):97-110
14 邓稳根, 戴海琦. 不同 IRT模型在生活取向测验修订版中的适用性比较. 江西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 2:216-220

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】