中国临床心理学杂志

钦佩-竞争自恋量表在中学生群体的信效度检验

作者：邓嘉欣杨忍王孟成邓俏文

单位：1. 广州大学教育学院心理系广州 510006 2. 浙江财经大学团委杭州 310018 3. 广州大学心理测量与潜变量建模研究中心广州 510006

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(3):445-447

摘要：

目的：评估钦佩-竞争自恋量表（NARQ）中文版在国内青少年群体中的适用性。方法：在362名中学生中采用NARQ中文版及多个效标工具进行调查，验证NARQ原量表的因子结构和信效度。结果：①NARQ量表的结构效度不理想（χ²=965.71，df=134，CFI=0.82，TLI=0.79，RMSEA=0.13）。②竞争自恋模型的结构效度良好（χ²=83.72，df=24，CFI=0.97，TLI=0.95，RMSEA=0.08）。③NARQ量表的内部一致性信度在0.80-0.86之间。④NARQ量表总分与反社会行为、病态人格障碍和攻击行为呈显著正相关。结论：NARQ中文版在中国文化背景下具有合理的信度和效标效度，可用于国内青少年自恋的评估与研究。

Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire (NARQ) in Chinese adolescents. Methods: The Chinese version of NARQ and several theoretical related measurements were administered to 362 middle school students. Results: ① The construct validity of NARQ was unsatisfactory(χ²=965.71, df=134, CFI=0.82, TLI=0.79, RMSEA=0.13). ②Narcissistic Rivalry Subscale showed well fitness(χ²=83.72, df=24, CFI=0.97, TLI=0.95, RMSEA=0.08). ③Internal consistencies of NARQ total score, Narcissistic Rivalry Subscale and Narcissistic Admiration Subscale were good, and the alpha coefficients of which ranged from 0.80 to 0.86. ④NARQ total score was significantly and positively correlated with anti-social behavior, pathological personality and aggressive behavior. Conclusion: The psychometric properties of NARQ are acceptable in Chinese adolescents.

基金项目：

本研究受国家自然科学基金（31400904）、大学生创新训练项目（201511078067）、广州市属高校社科项目（1201431330）和广州大学新苗计划（2004-27）的资助。

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders(DSM-5), 2013
2 Gentile B, Miller JD, Hoffman BJ, et al. A test of two brief measures of grandiose narcissism:the narcissistic personality inventory-13 and the narcissistic personality inventory-16. Psychological Assessment, 2013, 25(4):1120-1136
3 Rose P. The happy and unhappy faces of narcissism. Personality & Individual Differences, 2002, 33(3):379-391
4 Brown RP, Budzek K, Tamborski M. On the meaning and measure of narcissism. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 2009, 35(7):951-964
5 周晖, 张豹, 陈丽文.自恋人格问卷的编制及信效度的初步检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2009, 17(1):5-7
6 Back MD, Küfner A, Dufner M. Narcissistic admiration and rivalry:Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 2013, 105(6):1013-1037
7 张天宏, 肖泽萍. 自恋型人格障碍诊断标准的演进与问题. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2006, 14(6):609-611
8 刘明亮, 程姣, 邓俏文, 等. 反社会过程筛查表在国内青少年群体中的初步应用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24(6):1016-1020
9 Wang MC, Colins OF, Deng Q, Andershed H, Zeng H. (in press). Psychometric properties of the original and short version of the youth psychopathic traits inventory among Chinese adolescents. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment.
10 Fung ALC, Raine A, Gao Y. Cross-cultural generalizability of the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire(RPQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 2009, 91(5):473-479
11 Pincus AL, Ansell EB, Pimentel CA, et al. Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 2009, 21(3):365-379

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】