中国临床心理学杂志

社会权力感对性客体化的影响:性别与个人权力感的调节作用

作者：肖丽娟郑丽军郑涌

单位：1. 西南大学心理学部重庆 400715 2. 北京师范大学心理学院北京 100875

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(6):1054-1058

摘要：

目的：考察社会权力感对个体性客体化的影响，以及性别与个人权力感的调节作用。方法：以权力经历回忆法操纵个体的社会权力感，采用倒置效应作为客体化的指标对71名大学生进行研究。结果：①目标为性感男性时，社会权力感作用不显著，个人权力感及性别的共同调节作用也不显著。②目标为性感女性时，个人权力感与性别的共同调节作用显著。对高个人权力的男性和女性，社会权力感的预测作用均不显著。对低个人权力的男性，社会权力感负向预测个体的客体化认知。对低个人权力的女性，社会权力感正向预测个体的客体化认知。结论：社会权力感对性客体化的影响受到性别和个人权力感的调节，且该调节作用因个体性别及目标性别的不同而表现不同。

Objective:The purpose of this research was to explore the effect of social power on sexual obejctification, and the moderator effects of gender and personal power. Methods:A sample of 71 participants was recruited. We primed social power via recalling power experience and adopted body inversion effect as an indicator of sexual objectification. Results:①When presented sexualized male images, the effect of social power did not emerge, and personal power and gender did not moderate the effect of social power on sexual objectification; ②When presented sexualized female images, both gen-der and personal power moderated the effect of social power on sexual objectification. For those female and male partici-pants with high personal power, the effect of social power did not emerge. For male participants with low personal power, so-cial power predicted the process of objectification negatively. For female participants with low personal power, social power predicted the process of objectification positively. Conclusion:The effect of social power on sexual objectification is moder-ated by gender and personal power, and the moderator effects varies according to the gender of individual and target.

基金项目：

教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目（15YJA190011）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Bartky SL. Femininity and domination:Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. Psychology Press, 1990
2 Fredrickson BL, Roberts TA. Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1997, 21:173-206
3 李俊一, 尹清, 沈先昕. 性客体化经历对女性自我客体化的影响:被调节的中介模型. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23:1089-1093
4 Gervais SJ, Vescio TK, Allen J. When what you see is what you get:The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2011, 35:5-17
5 杜红芹, 张春梅, 牛更枫, 朱晓伟. 社交网站中的自拍对女性自我客体化的影响:外貌评论的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 6:1116-1119
6 Yin RK. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 81:141-145
7 Maurer D, Le Grand R, Mondloch C. The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2002, 6:255-260
8 Bernard P, Gervais SJ, Allen J, et al. Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition:The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 2012, 23:469-471
9 Schmidt AF,Kistemaker LM. The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis revisited:Valid indicator of sexual objectification or methodological artifact? Cognition, 2015, 134:77-84
10 Tarr MJ. Perception isn't so simple:commentary on bernard, gervais, allen, campomizzi, and klein(2012). Psychological Science, 2013, 24:1069-1070
11 Bernard P, Gervais SJ, Allen J, et al. From sex objects to human beings:Masking sexual body parts and humanization as moderators to women's objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2015, 39:432-446
12 Civile C, Obhi SS. Power, objectification, and recognition of sexualized women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2016, 40:199-212
13 Civile C, Rajagobal A, Obhi SS. Power, ethnic origin, and sexual objectification. Sage Open, 2016, 6(2):
14 Loughnan S, Fernandez-Campos S, Vaes J, et al. Exploring the role of culture in sexual objectification:A seven nations study. International Review of Social Psychology, 2015, 28:125-152
15 孙青青, 郑丽军, 郑涌. 裸露尤"物":性客体化影响社会认知的眼动证据. 心理科学, 2015, 38:1187-1193
16 魏秋江, 段锦云, 范庭卫. 权力操作范式的分析与比较. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20:1507-1518
17 Galinsky AD, Gruenfeld DH, Magee JC. From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 85:453-466
18 Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 2003, 110:265-284
19 Anderson C, John OP, Keltner D. The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 2012, 80:313-344
20 Overbeck JR, Park B. When power does not corrupt:superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 81:549-565
21 Anderson C, Berdahl JL. The experience of power:Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 83:1362-1377
22 Gruenfeld DH, Inesi ME, Magee JC, et al. Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2008, 95:111-127
23 张珊明, 钟毅平, 肖丽辉, 罗伏生. 权力启动对权力刻板印象的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23:848-852
24 Anderson C, Galinsky AD. Power, optimism, and risktaking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2006, 36:511-536
25 Reed CL, Stone VE, Grubb JD, et al. Turning configural processing upside down:Part and whole body postures. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 2006, 32:73-87
26 Loughnan S, Haslam N, Murnane T, et al. Objectification leads to depersonalization:The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2010, 40:709-717
27 Zhong C, Magee JC, Maddux WW, et al. Power, culture, and action:Considerations in the expression and enactment of power in East Asian and Western societies. Research on Managing in Teams and Groups, 2006, 9:53-73
28 Caza BB, Tiedens L, Lee F. Power becomes you:The effects of implicit and explicit power on the self. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2011, 114:15-24
29 Gervais SJ, Vescio TK, Förster J, et al. Seeing women as objects:The sexual body part recognition bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2012, 42:743-753
30 Levin S, Federico CM, Sidanius J, Rabinowitz JL. Social dominance orientation and intergroup bias:The legitimation of favoritism for high-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2002, 28:144-157

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】