中国临床心理学杂志

攻击规范信念量表在中学生群体中的信效度检验

作者：邵嵘王云强

单位：1. 西南大学心理学部重庆 400715 2. 南京师范大学道德教育研究所、心理学院南京 210097

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(6):1035-1038

摘要：

目的：检验攻击规范信念量表（Normative Beliefs about Aggression Scale，NOBAGS）在国内中学生群体中的信度和效度。方法：采用整群抽样两次共选取999名中学生进行测试，对攻击规范信念量表进行项目分析、探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、效标关联效度分析、内部一致性信度分析和重测信度分析。结果：攻击规范信念量表中文版包括共15个项目，分为两个维度：报复攻击信念和一般攻击信念。验证性因素分析显示，二因素模型的各项拟合指数均达到测量学要求。量表分数与攻击行为总分的相关为0.34，与攻击行为四个维度得分的相关为0.39、0.14、0.27和0.18。量表及其两个维度的内部一致性信度分别为0.81、0.78和0.72，重测信度分别为0.79、0.76和0.70。结论：攻击规范信念量表中文版具有较好的信度和效度，是测量我国青少年攻击信念的有效工具。

Objective:To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Normative Beliefs about Aggression Scale among Chinese middle school students. Methods:999 middle school students were investigated by using cluster sam-pling method. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, criterion-related validity analysis, in-ternal consistency reliability analysis and test-retest reliability analysis were conducted. Results:15 items of Chinese ver-sion of Normative Beliefs about Aggression Scale had 2 factors:approval of retaliation and general approval of aggression. The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the main fit indices of two-factor model met the needs of psycho-metrics. The correlation coefficient between the score of Chinese version of Normative Beliefs about Aggression Scale and the score of Aggression Questionnaire was 0.34, and the correlation coefficients between the score of Chinese version of Nor-mative Beliefs about Aggression Scale and the scores of four dimensions of Aggression Questionnaire were 0.39, 0.14, 0.27 and 0.18. The internal consistency reliabilities of the total scale and two dimensions are 0.81, 0.78 and 0.72, and the testretest reliabilities are 0.79, 0.76 and 0.70 respectively. Conclusion:The Chinese version of Normative Beliefs about Ag-gression Scale has good reliability and validity in Chinese middle school students for measuring beliefs about aggression.

基金项目：

国家社会科学基金青年项目（14CSH017）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 钟佑洁, 李艳华, 张进辅. 社会信息加工在儿童情绪调节与攻击行为间的中介效应检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23(1):108-114
2 Huesmann LR, Guerra NG. Children's normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 72(2):408-419
3 Lim SH, Ang RP. Relationship between boys'normative beliefs about aggression and their physical, verbal, and indirect aggressive behaviors. Adolescence, 2009, 44(44):635-650
4 Li JB, Nie YG, Boardley ID, et al. When do normative beliefs about aggression predict aggressive behavior? An application of I 3 theory. Aggressive Behavior, 2015, 41(6):544-555
5 Wright MF, Li Y. Normative beliefs about aggression and cyber aggression among young adults:a longitudinal investigation. Aggressive Behavior, 2013, 39:161-170
6 Kowalski RM, Giumetti GW, Schroeder AN, et al. Bullying in the digital age:a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 2014, 140(4):1073-1137
7 Burton KA, Dan F, Wygant DB. The role of peer attachment and normative beliefs about aggression on traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Psychology in the Schools, 2013, 50 (2):103-115
8 Machackova H, Pfetsch J. Bystanders'responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying:the role of empathy and normative beliefs about aggression. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2016, 57(2):169-176
9 Ang RP, Tan KA, Talib MA. Normative beliefs about aggression as a mediator of narcissistic exploitativeness and cyberbullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2011, 26(13):2619-2634
10 Gentile DA, Li D, Khoo A, et al. Mediators and moderators of long-term effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior:practice, thinking, and action. Jama Pediatrics, 2014, 168(5):450-457
11 段东园, 张学民, 魏柳青, 等. 暴力媒体接触程度对攻击行为的影响——规范信念和移情的作用. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2):185-192
12 Buss AH, Perry M. The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 63(3):452-459
13 Tremblaya PF, Ewart LA. The Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire and its relations to values, the Big Five, provoking hypothetical situations, alcohol consumption patterns, and alcohol expectancies. Personality and Individual Differences, 2005, 38(2):337-346
14 夏天生, 刘君, 顾红磊, 等. 父母冲突对青少年攻击行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32 (4):503-512
15 李董平, 张卫, 李丹黎, 等. 教养方式、气质对青少年攻击的影响:独特、差别与中介效应检验. 心理学报, 2012, 44 (2):211-225

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】