中国临床心理学杂志

明天会更好——空间隐喻的影响

作者：蔡妍张荷婧赖斯燕李达荣何先友

单位：1. 北京师范大学心理学院北京 100875 2. 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室北京 100875 3. 华南师范大学心理学院广州 510631

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(2):237-241

摘要：

目的：探讨“过去-消极，未来-积极”内隐联结是否存在，以及符合空间隐喻（过去和消极类别标签呈现在左侧，未来和积极类别标签在右侧）时联结强度是否更强。方法：以38名右利手大学生为被试，时间词为目标词，人格词和效价词分别为两个IAT任务的属性词，以类别标签呈现的位置作为空间变量，形成被试内设计。结果：①“过去-消极，未来-积极”内隐联结强度大于0.3，反应时显著低于相反的联结；②“过去-消极”在左，“未来-积极”在右的联结显著强于不符合空间隐喻的联结，反应时也显著更短。结论：存在“过去-消极，未来-积极”的内隐联结，并且符合空间隐喻的内隐联结更强，提出了同一始源域上的抽象概念存在相互联结的可能性。

Objective: To investigate the relationship between past and negative affect, and between future and positive affect exist. The modulating effect of spatial metaphor on strength of these relationships was also examined. Methods: Thirty-eight university students who are right-handed participated in two IAT tasks, which put temporal words as target concepts, personality words and affective words as attribute dimension respectively, and the positions of category labels as spatial variable. All of them are within-subjects designs. Results: ①The strength of the connection, tomorrow will be better, was larger than 0.3. And participants responded significantly faster than the opposite. ②When the connection between past and negative was presented on the left side, future and positive were presented on the right side, the strength was greater and the response time was significantly faster than other conditions. Conclusion: There are implicit association between past and negative affect, as well as between future and positive affect. And the strength of these associations are modulated by spatial metaphor, which offers the possibility of the connections between the target domains that are constructed on the same source domain.

基金项目：

国家自然科学基金项目（31671132）；教育部重点研究基地心理应用研究中心课题（15JJD190005）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Wilson AE, Ross M. From chump to champ:people's appraisals of their earlier and present selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 80(4):572
2 Heller D, Stephan E, Kifer Y, et al. What will I be? The role of temporal perspective in predictions of affect, traits, and self-narratives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2011, 47(3):610-615
3 Wilson AE, Buehler R, Lawford H, et al. Basking in projected glory:The role of subjective temporal distance in future self-appraisal. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2012, 42(3):342-353
4 罗扬眉, 黄希庭. 时间自我评价的性质. 西南大学学报:社会科学版, 2011, 37(6):1-6
5 Kanten AB, Teigen KH. Better than average and better with time:Relative evaluations of self and others in the past, present, and future. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2008, 38(2):343-353
6 Busseri MA, Choma BL, Sadava SW."As good as it gets" or "The best is yet to come"? How optimists and pessimists view their past, present, and anticipated future life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 2009, 47(4):352-356
7 Luo Y, Huang X, Chen Y, et al. Negativity bias of the self across time:an event-related potentials study. Neuroscience Letters, 2010, 475(2):69-73
8 殷融, 苏得权, 叶浩生. 具身认知视角下的概念隐喻理论. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(2):220-234
9 Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1980
10 Vallesi A, Binns MA, Shallice T. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes:understanding the cognitive representations of time. Cognition, 2008, 107(2):501-527
11 Fuhrman O, Boroditsky L. Cross-Cultural Differences in Mental Representations of Time:Evidence From an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task. Cognitive Science, 2010, 34(8):1430-1451
12 Santiago J, Lupáñez J, Pérez E, et al. Time(also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2007, 14(3):512-516
13 Ulrich R, Maienborn C. Left-right coding of past and future in language:The mental timeline during sentence processing. Cognition, 2010, 117(2):126-138
14 Lakens D, Semin GR, Garrido MV. The sound of time:Cross-modal convergence in the spatial structuring of time. Consciousness and Cognition, 2011, 20(2):437-443
15 殷融, 曲方炳, 叶浩生."右好左坏" 和"左好右坏"——利手与左右空间情感效价的关联性. 心理科学进展, 2012, 12:10
16 Casasanto D. Embodiment of abstract concepts:good and bad in right-and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 2009, 138(3):351
17 de la Vega I, De Filippis M, Lachmair M, et al. Emotional valence and physical space:limits of interaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 2012, 38(2):375
18 李娟娟. 情绪效价, 时间与左右空间的关联性. 陕西师范大学, 2014
19 黄希庭. 未来时间的心理结构. 心理学报, 1994, 26(2):121-127
20 黄希庭, 胡维芳. 过去时间的心理结构. 心理科学, 1998, 21(1):1-4
21 王登峰, 崔红. 解读中国人的人格. 北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2005. 371-414
22 王一牛, 周立明, 罗跃嘉. 汉语情感词系统的初步编制及评定. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2008,(8):608-612
23 Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition:the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(6):1464
24 高旭辰. 内隐联想测验影响因素研究. 上海:华东师范大学, 2004
25 马甜语. 积极心理学及其应用的理论研究. 长春:吉林大学, 2009
26 Dehaene S, Bossini S, Giraux P. The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 1993, 122(3):371
27 Williams LE, Bargh JA. Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 2008, 322(5901):606-607
28 Meier BP, Robinson MD, Clore GL. Why good guys wear white automatic inferences about stimulus valence based on brightness. Psychological Science, 2004, 15(2):82-87

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】