中国临床心理学杂志

儿童版积极-消极情感量表在中学生群体中的信效度检验

作者：魏欢陈维韦嘉张进辅

单位：1. 四川师范大学招生就业处成都 610068 2. 西南大学心理学部重庆 400715 3. 四川师范大学教育科学学院成都 610068

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(1):105-110

摘要：

目的：对中文版儿童积极-消极情感量表（positive affect and negative affect scalefor Children，PANAS-C）在中学生群体中进行信效度检验。方法：通过4次抽样，初测调查20人对PANAS-C进行条目可理解性检验；再测调查523人对PANAS-C进行项目分析、探索性因素分析和概化分析，通过删减形成正式中文简版；正式调查484人进行验证性因素分析，受测者同时完成儿童抑郁调查表（第二版）（Children's Depression Inventory 2^nd Edition，CDI2）、儿童宾州忧虑问卷（The PennState Worry Questionnaire for Children，PSWQ-C）和罗森博格自尊量表（Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale，RSES）检验效标关联效度。另抽取53人进行2周重测信度检验。结果：中文版PANAS-C共27个条目，PA（NA）分量表的α系数为0.94（0.94），两周重测组内相关系数为0.79（0.84），单因子模型各主要拟合指标为χ²/df=3.65（3.13），CFI=0.95（0.91），TLI=0.93（0.90），SRMR=0.03（0.05），RMSEA=0.08（0.07）。PA（NA）与CDI2和PSWQ-C的相关为-0.55（0.57）和-0.31（0.56），与RSES的相关为0.55（-0.48）（均P<0.01）。概化分析表明PANAS-C缩减为10题和20题时，信度系数仍能维持在大于0.8和0.9的水平。结论：中文版PANAS-C具有较好的信效度，是测量中学生积极-消极情感的适宜工具。

Objective: To introduce short version of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale for Children (PANAS-C), and examine its reliability and validity in Chinese middle school students. Methods: 523 students completed the PANAS-C for primary exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Generalizability Analysis (GA). After that, 484 students were recruited for the formal investigation with a battery of structured questionnaires, including PANAS-C, Children's Depression Inventory 2^nd Edition (CDI2), The PennState Worry Questionnaire for Children (PSWQ-C), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES). 53 students completed the PANAS-C two-weeks later for test-retest reliability test. Results: CFA showed that the structure of the PA (NA) subscale was reasonable:χ²/df=3.65 (3.13), CFI=0.95 (0.91), TLI=0.93 (0.90), SRMR=0.03 (0.05), RMSEA=0.08 (0.07). The α coefficient of the PA (NA) was 0.94 (0.94). The test-retest reliability was 0.79 (0.84). GA showed that even if the items of PANAS-C were cut down to 10 or 20, the α coefficient still maintained at a reasonable level. Conclusion: Chinese short Version of PANAS-C is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing positive and negative affects in Chinese culture.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 黄希庭. 心理学导论. 北京:人民教育出版社,1991
2 潘婷婷,丁雪辰,桑标,等. 正负性情感量表儿童版(PANAS-C)的信效度初探. 中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23:397-400
3 Ebesutani C, Regan J, Smith A, et al. The 10-item positive and negative affect schedule for children, child and parent shortened versions:application of Item Response Theory for more efficient assessment. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2012, 34:191-203
4 Harmon-Jones E, Harmon-Jones C. On the relationship of trait PANAS positive activation and trait anger:Evidence of a suppressor relationship. Journal of Research in Personality, 2010, 44:120-123
5 廖军和,欧阳儒阳,左春荣,等. 贫困大学生感戴与主观幸福感的关系:链式中介效应分析. 中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23:722-724
6 Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect:the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 54:1063-1070
7 王力,李中权,柳恒超,杜卫. PANAS-X总维度量表在中国人群中的因素结构. 中国临床心理学杂志,2008,15:565-568
8 Laurent J, Catanzaro SJ, Joiner Jr TE, et al. Gathright TA measure of positive and negative affect for children:scale development and preliminary validation. Psychological Assessment, 1999, 11:326-338
9 Hughes AA, Kendall PC. Psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale for Children(PANAS-C) in children with anxiety disorders. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 2009, 40:343-352
10 韦嘉,韩会芳,张春雨,等. 马洛-克罗恩社会赞许性量表(简版)在中学生群体中的试用. 中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23:585-589+599
11 Kovacs M. Children's Depression Inventory 2^nd Edition (CDI2) Manual. Toronto:Multi-Health Systems, 2010
12 Chorpita BF, Tracey SA, Brown TA, et al. Assessment of worry in children and adolescents:An adaptation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1997, 35:569-581
13 Rosenberg M. Rosenberg self-esteem scale(RSE). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Measures Package, 61. Unpublished manuscript, Retrieved March 4^th, 2014
14 邱皓政. 量化研究法(三):测验原理与量表发展技术. 台北:双叶书廊,2012

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】