中国临床心理学杂志

人生意义量表(修订版)的适用性和推广性:基于CTT 和多维Rasch 的分析

作者：陈维¹ 3 葛缨² 3 胡媛艳² 3 张进辅³

单位：1. 贵州师范大学教育科学学院贵阳550001
2. 重庆文理学院认知与心理健康实验室重庆402160
3. 西南大学心理学部重庆400715

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2015,23(4):604-607

摘要：

目的:考察人生意义量表(修订版)在大学生群体中的适用性,并分析了它的推广性。方法:采用人生意义量表(修订版)、Rosenberg自尊量表、一般自我效能感量表和孤独感量表对1200名在校大学生进行调查,对问卷的信效度进行了检验。结果:无论正交或者斜交旋转,提取的双因子结构相同;多维Rasch分析发现拥有意义感和寻求意义感的项目信度分别为0.809和0.835,分离信度为0.988。结论:人生意义量表(修订版)具有良好的信、效度,在应用研究中具有可推广性。

Objective: The present study aimed to develop the Revised Meaning in Life Questionnaire(RMLQ) for col-lege students, RMLQ and investigate its psychometric properties as well as generalizability. Methods: 1200 college stu-dents were surveyed with the RMLQ, Rosenberg's Self-esteem Scale, General Self-efficacy Scale, and Revision of the Un-dergraduates'Loneliness Scale. Results: The bi-factor structure was very steady, no matter what the rotation is the vari-max or promax. The item reliability of presence of meaning and search of meaning are respectively 0.809 and 0.835 using multidimensional Rasch analysis, the separation reliability is 0.988. Conclusion: The reliability and validity are excellent for the Revised Meaning in Life Questionnaire.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Steger MF, Frazier P, Oishi S, et al. The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2006, 53 (1): 80-93
2 程明明,樊富珉. 生命意义心理学理论取向与测量. 心理发展与教育,2010,26(4):431-437
3 王鑫强. 生命意义感量表中文修订版在中学生群体中的信效度. 中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(10):720-729
4 刘思斯,甘怡群. 生命意义感量表中文版在大学生群体中的信效度. 中国心理卫生杂志,2010,24(6):478-482
5 王孟成,戴晓阳. 中文人生意义问卷(C-MLQ) 在大学生中的适用性. 中国临床心理学杂志,2008,16(5):459-461
6 吴明隆. 结构方程模型:Amos 实务进阶. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2013
7 Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences(2^nd) . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2006
8 Wu M, Adams R. Applying the Rasch model to psychosocial measurement: A practical approach. Melbourne: Educational Measurement Solutions, 2007
9 Adams RJ, Wilson M, Wang WC. The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1997, 21(1): 1-23
10 季益富,于欣. 自尊量表. 中国心理卫生杂志,1999,13 (12):318-320
11 杨建原,陈维,赵守盈. SES的结构效度层面分析. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2014,59(1):83-86
12 申自力,蔡太生. Rosenberg 自尊量表中文版条目8的处理. 中国心理卫生杂志,2008,22(9):661-663
13 韦嘉, 张春雨, 董山川, 等. 中文版Friedman-Bendas考试焦虑量表在中学生群体中的试用. 中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(4):718-726
14 Feldt LS, Woodruff DJ, Salih, FA. Statistical inference for coefficient alpha. Applied Psychological Measurement,1987, 11(1): 93-103
15 王才康,刘勇. 一般自我效能感与特质焦虑, 状态焦虑和考试焦虑的相关研究. 中国临床心理学杂志,2000,8(4):229-230
16 黎芝. UCLA孤独感量表中文简化版(ULS-8) 的考评及应用研究. 硕士论文. 长沙:中南大学,2012
17 Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology,2003, 88(5): 879-903
18 Lindell MK, Whitney DJ. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(1): 114-121
19 周浩,龙立荣. 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950
20 彭台光,高月慈,林钲棽. 管理研究中的共同方法变异:问题本质、影响、测试和补救. 管理学报,2006,23(1):77-98
21 Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Patil A. Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 2006, 52 (12): 1865-1883
22 刘霞,赵景欣,申继亮. 歧视知觉对城市流动儿童幸福感的影响:中介机制及归属需要的调节作用. 心理学报,2013,45(5):568-584
23 罗杰,周瑗,陈维,等. 教师职业认同与情感承诺的关系: 工作满意度的中介作用. 心理发展与教育,2014,30(3):322-328
24 Harris SG, Mossholder KW. The affective implications of perceived congruence with culture dimensions during organizational transformation. Journal of Management, 1996, 22 (4): 527-547
25 Podsakoff PM, Organ DW. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management,1986, 12(4):531-544
26 Hayes AF, Krippendorff K. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 2007, 1(1): 77-89

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】