中国临床心理学杂志

成人公正世界信念问卷的编制及信效度检验

单位：1. 中国地质大学(武汉)应用心理学研究所武汉430074
2. 华中师范大学心理学院武汉430079

关键词：公正世界信念信度效度

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2015,23(4):580-584

摘要：

目的:编制本土化的成人公正世界信念问卷。方法:在理论探索和开放式问卷调查的基础上,保留西方研究结构中的人际维度,结合中国文化下公正观中的时间维度,提出人际与时间相结合的四因子整合结构。以237名处于不同社会阶层的普通成人为被试进行初测,对问卷进行项目分析、因素分析。以854名不同阶层的普通成人为被试进行正式施测,对问卷进行信效度检验。结果:①成人公正世界信念包含自我现在、自我未来、他人现在、他人未来四个因子,共15题;②问卷具有良好的内部一致性、重测信度、结构效度和效标效度。结论:成人公正世界信念问卷具有良好的信效度,可以作为本土化的测量工具。

Objective: To develop the scale of belief in a just world for Chinese adults. Methods: Based on the classic differentiation between belief in a just world for self and for others, researchers proposed a four-factor construct integrating the self-other differences with now-future differences, developed the scale of belief in a just world, and examined the psy-chometric properties of the proposed construct. Results: ①The scale of belief in a just world included 15 items and in-volved 4 factors, as named present justice beliefs for self, future justice beliefs for self, present justice beliefs for others, fu-ture justice beliefs for others. ②The scale had good coefficient of internal consistency and retest reliability, and acceptable construct and content validity. Conclusion: The scale has good reliability and validity, and can be applied to measure the belief in a just world in Chinese adults.

基金项目：

教育部人文社会科学青年项目(14YJC190027);湖北省高校人文社科重点研究基地——中国地质大学大学生发展与创新教育研究中心科研开放基金资助(DXS20140025)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 周春燕,郭永玉. 公正世界信念——重建公正的双刃剑. 心理科学进展,2013,21(1):144-154
2 郭永玉,周春燕. 公正世界信念对低社会阶层的双重作用. 西南大学学报(社会科学版),2014,1:63-67
3 吴佩君,李晔. 公正世界信念的文化差异. 心理科学进展,2014,11:1814-1822.
4 Wu MS, Yan X, Zhou C, et al. General belief in a just world and resilience: Evidence from a collectivistic culture. European Journal of Personality, 2011, 25(6): 431-442
5 Rubin Z, Peplau LA. Who believes in a just world?. Journal of Social Issues, 1975, 31(3): 65-89
6 Furnham A. Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences,2003, 34(5): 795-817
7 Hafer CL, Begue L. Experimental research on just-world theory: Problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 2005, 131(1): 128-167
8 Lipkus IM, Dalbert C, Siegler IC. The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1996, 22(7): 666-677
9 吴胜涛,王力,周明洁,等. 灾区民众的公正观与幸福感及其与非灾区的比较. 心理科学进展,2009,17(3):579-587
10 刘长江, 殷晓菲, 赵然. 青少年公正世界信念发展特点研究. 沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版),2008,6:138-141
11 Maes J. Immanent justice and ultimate justice/responses to victimizations and belief in a just world. Springer, 1998. 9-40
12 Strack M, Gennerich C, Münster D. Beliefs in immanent justice or ultimate justice-understanding their differences. Paper Presented on the 11th International Social Justice Research Conference, 2006
13 Lucas T, Zhdanova L, Alexander S. Procedural and distributive justice beliefs for self and others: Assessment of a fourfactor individual differences model. Journal of Individual Differences, 2011, 32(1): 14-25
14 杜建政,祝振兵,李兴琨. 大学生公正世界信念量表的初步编制. 中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(3):239-241
15 吴忠民. 汉语语境中公正和正义概念的区别. 理论视野,2011,4:21-23
16 许超. 正义与公正,公平,平等之关系辨析. 社会科学战线,2010,2:189-194
17 陆学艺. 当代中国社会阶层研究报告/中国社会阶层研究丛书. 社会科学文献出版社,2002
18 Correia I, Batista MT, Lima ML. Does the belief in a just world bring happiness? Causal relationships among belief in a just world, life satisfaction and mood. Australian Journal of Psychology, 2009, 61(4): 220-227
19 Diener ED, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, et al. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, 49 (1): 71-75
20 周春燕,郭永玉. 家庭社会阶层对大学生心理健康的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(4):636-640
21 Lachman ME, Weaver SL. The sense of control as a moder ator of social class differences in health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(3):763-773
22 李静. 不同社会阶层对贫富差距的归因倾向研究. 华中师范大学博士论文,2012
23 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社,2010

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】