中国临床心理学杂志

解释认知偏差矫正效果及其对先前记忆的影响

作者：韩祖晔孙玮洁杨冉明杨槟张钦崔丽霞

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2015,23(3):410-415

摘要：

目的:研究解释偏差矫正训练(Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretation, CBM-I)对个体解释偏差的改变效果及对先前记忆的影响。方法:选取54名健康大学生为被试, 首先为其呈现无结尾的模糊情景, 并要求为该情景续写一个结局, 之后将被试随机分配至对模糊情景进行积极解释的训练组(n=27)或消极解释的训练组(n=27)进行CBM-I训练。结果:积极组比消极组对积极探测情景的反应时更短(P <0.001), 消极组比积极组对消极探测情景反应时更短(P <0.05);对新的模糊情景进行相似度评估, 积极组比消极组倾向于积极解释(P =0.06), 消极组比积极组倾向于消极解释(P <0.05);对先前记忆内容(即先前续写的模糊情景结局)的回忆效价更倾向于CBM-I训练效价(消极训练组P <0.05)。结论:CBM-I训练能有效改变解释偏差倾向, 且对训练前的记忆产生定向影响。

Objective: To examine whether CBM-I training could induce the directive changing of individual's interpretation bias and whether it could affect the previous memory. Methods: The subjects were 54 healthy college students. They were provided with some ambiguous situations and were asked to image that they were in the situations and write endings for them. Then they were assigned randomly into the positive group(n=27) or the negative group(n=27) of CBM-Itraining. Results: The reaction times to the positive probe situations of positive group were shorter than negative group significantly (P <0.001), while the reaction times to the negative probe situations of negative group were shorter than positive group(P < 0.05); When they were requested to assess the similarity between the fresh ambiguous situations and the statements provided with emotional valence, positive group tended to explain more positively than negative group(P =0.06), and negative group tended to make more negative interpretations than positive group(P <0.05). When they were asked to recall the previous memory of those situations and the endings they wrote, the negative group remembered more negative previous reactions (P <0.05). Conclusion: The CBM-I training could change the interpretation bias effectively andaffect the previous memory.

基金项目：

北京市教委科技面上项目(KM201210028014)和国家自然科学基金面上项目(31470980)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Siemer M, Mauss IB, Gross JJ. Same situation-different emotions: How appraisals shape our emotions. Emotion, 2007, 7 (3): 592-600
2 Mathews A, MacLeod C. Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2005, 1(1): 167-195
3 Courtney B, Risa BW, Nader A. Combined cognitive bias modification treatment for social anxiety disorder: a pilot tria. Depression and Anxiety, 2011, 28(11): 981-988
4 Beard, Courtney, Amir, Nader. A multi-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretation and social anxiety symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2008, 46(10): 1135-1141
5 Salemink E, Wiers RW. Modifying Threat-related Interpretive Bias in Adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2011, 39(7): 967-997
6 Everaert J, Koster EH, Derakshan N. The combined cognitive bias hypothesis in depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 2012, 32(5): 413-424
7 Hertel PT, Brozovich F, Joormann J, Gotlib IH. Biases in interpretation and memory in Generalized Social Phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2008, 117(2): 278-288
8 李丹枫, 余真真, 段添翼, 等. 解释偏向矫正对大学生演讲焦虑的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(1):43-47
9 Rusting CL, DeHart T. Retrieving positive memories to regulate negative mood: Consequences for mood-congruent memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 78(4): 737
10 Joormann, Jutta, Siemer, Matthias. Memory accessibility, mood regulation, and dysphoria: Difficulties in repairing sad mood with happy memories? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2004, 113(2): 179-187
11 Jutta J, Matthias S, Ian HG. Mood regulation in depression: Differential effects of distraction and recall of happy memories on sad mood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2007, 116(3): 484
12 Charles, Susan T, Mather, et al. Aging and emotional memory: The forgettable nature of negative images for older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2003, 132(2): 310-310
13 李文利, 钱铭怡. 状态特质焦虑量表中国大学生常模修订. 北京大学学报:自然科学版, 1995, 31(1):108-114
14 Mathews A, Mackintosh B. Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2000, 109 (4): 602-615
15 Mackintosh B, Mathews A, Yiend J, et al. Induced biases in emotional interpretation influence stress vulnerability and endure despite changes in context. Behavior Therapy, 2006, 37(3): 209-222
16 Salemink, Elske, van den Hout, et al. Generalisation of modified interpretive bias across tasks and domains. Cognition and Emotion, 2010, 24(3): 453-464
17 Todd RM, Müller DJ, Lee DH, et al. Genes for emotionenhanced remembering are linked to enhanced perceiving. Psychological Science, 2013, 24(11): 2244-2253
18 Lyubomirsky S, Caldwell ND, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Effects of ruminative and distracting responses to depressed mood on retrieval of autobiographical memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75(1): 166-177
19 MacLeod, Colin, Campbell, Lynlee. Memory accessibility and probability judgments: An experimental evaluation of the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 63(6): 890-902
20 Tran T, Hertel PT, Joormann J. Cognitive bias modification: Induced interpretive biases affect memory. Emotion, 2011, 11(1): 145-152
21 Charles S, Mather M, Carstensen LL. Aging and emotional memory: The forgettable nature of negative images for older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2003, 132(2): 310-324
22 Hirsch C, Mathews A. Impaired positive inferential bias in social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2000, 109 (4): 705-712
23 Koster EHW, Fox E, MacLeod C. Introduction to the special section on cognitive bias modification in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2009, 118(1): 1-4

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】