中国临床心理学杂志

应激评价量表的初步修订

作者：薛云珍¹ 2 梁宝勇¹

单位：1. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院天津 300074
2. 山西医科大学医学心理学教研室山西太原 030001

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2009,17(2):145-147

摘要：

目的：修订应激评价量表(SAM)，测试中文版的信效度。方法：用翻译的应激评价量表(SAM)对767名大学生进行测试，另外对166名大学生进行内在-外在心理控制源量表(I-E)、症状自评量表(SCL-90)、正性负性情绪量表(PANAS)的测定。结果：①修订的应激评价量表具有较好的项目区分度；②验证性因素分析显示，根据理论构想的1阶6因素2阶2因素模型拟合良好；③本量表内部一致性系数为0.678，各个分量表的α系数在0.502～0.804之间；④各个维度间的相关系数为0.262～0.743；⑤除个别维度外，应激评价量表(SAM)与内在-外在心理控制源量表(I-E)、症状自评量表(SCL-90)、正性负性情绪量表(PANAS)显著相关。结论：修订的应激评价量表(SAM)的信度和效度指标符合心理测量学的要求，可作为大学生认知评价的测量工具。

Objective: To develop a cross-culture revision of the stress appraisal measure (SAM), and test its reliability and validity. Methods: 767 undergraduates were measured with stress appraisal measure (SAM), 166 university students participated in a retest, using the Internal-External Locus of Control Scale (I-E), Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) and Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS). Results: ①The item distinguish analysis is acceptable. ②Confirmatory factor analysis suggested that the first order six factor-second order two factor model was perfect according to the evaluation criteria. ③Reliability analysis confirmed that Cronbach α coefficient of SAM was 0.678 and Cronbach α coefficient of the seven subscales ranged from 0.502 to 0.804. ④The correlation coefficients between subscales ranged from 0.262 to 0.743. ⑤The correlation coefficients among the SAM and I-E, SCL-90, PANAS were significant respectively, except one or two factors. Conclusion: The revised SAM showed the satisfactory reliability and validity. It has met the standard of psychometrics.

基金项目：

教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2005年重大研究项目(05JJDXLX164)资助

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Lazarus RS，Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company，1984．287-327
[2] Ahmad MM. Psychometric evaluation of the Cognitive Appraisal of Health Scale with patients with prostate cancer. Journal of Advanced Nursing，2005，49(1)：78-86
[3] Peacock EJ，Wong P. The stress appraisal measure (SAM): A multidimensional approach to cognitive appraisal. Stress Medicine，1990，6：227-236
[4] 汪向东，王希林，马弘，编著.心理卫生评定量表手册.增刊．中国心理卫生杂志，1999．330-332
[5] 张作记主编.行为医学量表手册.中华医学电子音像出版社，2005．64-67，236-237
[6] Gan Q W，Anshel MH. Differences between Elite and NonElite, Male and Female Chinese Athletes on Cognitive Appraisal of Stressful Events in Competitive Sport. Journal of Sport Behavior，2006，29(3)：213-228
[7] 郝志红，梁宝勇.关于寻求专业性心理帮助的态度问卷的修订.中国临床心理学杂志，2007，15(1)：1-3

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】