设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
社交回避与苦恼量表在学生群体中的信效度研究
作者:彭纯子1  范晓玲1  李罗初2 
单位:1. 中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理研究中心  湖南 长沙410011 
2.
 长沙市地质中学教师 
关键词:Social Avoidance and Distress Scale Chinese students Validity Reliability 
分类号:G444
出版年,卷(期):页码:2003,11(4):279-281
摘要:

Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of Social Avoidance and Distress Scale(SAD) for conforming its applicability in Chinese students. Methods: A total of 598 undergraduates, 259 high school students were administered five self-reported scales: Social Avoidance and Distress Scale, Interaction Anxiousness Scale, Self-rating Anxiety Scale, Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale, and Self-Rating Depression Scale. Results: Cronbach α of SAD was 0.85. The test-retest correlation was 0.76. The results of confirmatory factor analyses supported its 2-factor model. The correlation scores of SAD with the homogeneous scales were higher than that with heterogeneous scales. Conclusion: SAD had good psychometric properties applied in Chinese students.

Objective: To evaluate the validity and reliability of Social Avoidance and Distress Scale(SAD) for conforming its applicability in Chinese students. Methods: A total of 598 undergraduates, 259 high school students were administered five self-reported scales: Social Avoidance and Distress Scale, Interaction Anxiousness Scale, Self-rating Anxiety Scale, Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale, and Self-Rating Depression Scale. Results: Cronbach α of SAD was 0.85. The test-retest correlation was 0.76. The results of confirmatory factor analyses supported its 2-factor model. The correlation scores of SAD with the homogeneous scales were higher than that with heterogeneous scales. Conclusion: SAD had good psychometric properties applied in Chinese students.

基金项目:
作者简介:
参考文献:

[1] Bobes J.How is recovery from anxiety disorder defined? J Clin Psychia,1998,59(17): 12-16
[2] Watson D,Friend R.Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety.J Consult Clin Psychol,1969,33:448-457
[3] Patterson ML,Strauss ME.An examination of the discriminate validity of the social avoidance anddistress scale.J Consult Clin Psychol,1969,39
[4] Leary MR,Knight PD,Johnson KA.Social anxiety and dyadic conversation: A verbal response analysis.J soc clin Psychol,1987(5): 34-50
[5] 杨眉.大学生社交焦虑的集体心理治疗.中国心理卫生杂志,1997,11(4): 247-254
[6] 曹海江,周文军.两种小组疗法治疗社交焦虑的报告.中国临床心理学杂志,1997,3 (5): 19-20
[7] 彭纯子,燕良轼,等.大学生社交焦虑的团体心理治疗的比较研究.中国心理卫生杂志,2003,17(4): 229-231
[8] 路英智,张勤锋,田明萍,等.森田疗法治疗社交恐怖症的对照研究.中国行为医学科学,2000,2: 131-132
[9] 刘浩志,马智文.认知领悟疗法治疗社交恐怖症的对照研究.健康心理学,2002,4: 265-266
[10] 林雄标,胡纪泽.社交恐怖症的临床症状特征.临床精神医学杂志,1998,2: 86-87
[11] 汪向东,等.中国心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志社.1999
[12] Samuel M,Turner DC,et al.Validity of the social avoidance and distress and fear of negative evaluation scales.Bebav Res Ther,1987,25,2,113-115
[13] 林雄标,胡赤怡.社交恐怖症的临床与认知特点.上海精神医学,1997,新9 (2):87-90
[14] Tian PS,Oei Kennna D,Evans L.The Reliability,Validity and Utility of the SAD and FNE Scales forAnxiety Disorder Patients.Person Individ Diff,12(2):111-116
[15] 季益富,许又新.对社交恐怖症的临床分析.健康心理学,1997,5(2):109-110
[16] Jones WH,Briggs SR,Smith TF.Shyness: Conceptualization and measurement,J Pers and Soc Psychol,1986,51.629-639

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com