中国临床心理学杂志

父母养育方式量表(PBI)在中国大学生中的初步修订

单位：1. 中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理学研究中心湖南长沙 410011
2. 中南大学湘雅二医院儿科湖南长沙 410011

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2009,17(4):434-436

摘要：

目的：检验父母养育方式量表(Parental Bonding Instrument，PBI)在我国大学生中的适用性，并在此基础上对其进行修订。方法：通过翻译，回译，预试等几个主要步骤确定PBI的中译本，对849名在校大学生进行团体施测。结果：母亲版(PBI-M)和父亲版(PBI-F)各包括23个条目，探索性因素分析提取三个因子(关爱、鼓励自主、控制)，三个因子可分别解释方差总变异的46.22%和49.28%。验证性因素分析结果显示，在三因素模型中，母亲版：χ²/df=2.457，GFI=0.898，AGFI=0.871，CFI=0.900，NFI=0.844，NNFI=0.844，RMSEA=0.059；父亲版：χ²/df=3.052，GFI=0.870，AGFI=0.839，CFI=0.858，NFI=0.805，NNFI=0.838，RMSEA=0.070。同质性信度为0.745~0.858，分半信度为0.661~0.844，重测信度为0.746~0.941。结论：修订后的中文版PBI具有较好的信、效度，适用于我国大学生。

Objective: To revise and examine the applicability of Parental Bonding Instrument within a sample of Chinese college students. Methods: A sample of 849 students completed a battery of structured questionnaires including the final Chinese Version of PBI, Adult Attamachment Questionnaire 3.1 (AAQ3.1). And factor analysis was applied to the data. Results: The final revised Mother version(PBI-M) and Father version(PBI-F) both contained 23 items, with loading between 0.503~0.782, three subscales(care, encourage autonomy, control), which could explain 46.22% and 49.28% of the total variances. The Cronbach’ s аs of the three subscales were 0.745~0.858, Guttman Split-Half Coefficients 0.661~0.844, test -retest reliabilities 0.746 ~0.941. Conclusion: The Parental Bonding Instrument for Chinese college students has satisfying validities and reliabilities and is suitable for use among Chinese undergraduates.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Hadas W，Ofra M，Ruth S. Why are they lonely? Perceived quality of early relationships with parents,attachment，personality predispositions and loneliness in first-year university students. Personality and Individual Differences，2006，40：237-248
[2] Willem AA，Coby G，Walter V，et al. Convergent validity of the dimensions underlying the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) and the EMBU. Personality and Individal Differences，1998，24(3)：341-345
[3] Gordon P，Hilary T，Brown LB. Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI). www.blackdoginstitute.org.au.
[4] 徐毕卿，罗文倬，龙佛卫.双亲教养态度量表中文版之信效度研究.护理研究，1999，7(5)：479-489
[5] 李菲茗，傅根耀.成人依恋问卷（AAQ3.1）的初步试用.中国临床心理学杂志，2001，9（3）：190-192
[6] 杨红君，周世杰.卫校女生成人依恋及父母教养方式与自尊的关系.中国临床心理学杂志，2008，16(2)：189-191
[7] Gordon P. The Parental Bonding Instrument. http://www. blackdoginstitute.org.au/research/tools/index.cf,#PBI
[8] Mohr S，Preisig M，Fenton BT，et al. Validation of the French version of the patental bonding instrument in adults. Personality and Individual Differences，1999，26：1065-1074
[9] Tomohiro N，Tetsuya S，Shigeki H，et al. Parental child rearing behavior as measured by Parental Bonding Instrument in a Japanese population： Factor structure and rel ationship to a lifetime history of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders，2000，57：229-234
[10] Dirk H，Herbert M，Sebastian B，et al. Empirical evidence for an invariant three -factor structure if the Parental Bonding Instrument in six European countries. Psychiatry Research，2005，135：237-247

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】