中国临床心理学杂志

学习过程问卷的结构及信、效度研究

作者：涂阳军¹ 陈建文² 李传玲³

单位：1. 华中师范大学心理学院湖北武汉 430079
2. 华中科技大学教育科学研究院湖北武汉 430074
3. 华南农业大学经济管理学院

分类号：G449.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2008,16(2):119-122

摘要：

目的:探讨学习过程问卷的结构并检验其信、效度。方法:以Biggs等人的研究为基础,使用雷雳等1997年研究中的学习过程问卷,对756名大学生的测试结果进行探索性和验证性因子分析及信效度检验。结果:探索性及验证性因素分析均支持六因子模型,不支持根据理论建构的其它三个模型;问卷整体内部一致性系数为0.81,间隔六月问卷的稳定性系数为0.70;各因素间的相关在-0.01-0.50之间,各因素与总分间的相关在0.41以上,问卷各题项与其所属因素间相关在0.42以上。结论:本研究支持该问卷的六因素结构,问卷的信效度符合心理测量学的基本要求,但表层动机及表层策略所属个别题项仍需进一步的修改。

Objective: To explore the structure of the SPQ and to examine its reliability and validity.Methods: On the basis of researches of Biggs et.al.using the SPQ borrowed from professor LeiLi et.al.’s study in 1997,we administrated the SPQ to 756 college students.EFA and CFA were used to verify the structure of the SPQ and its reliability and validity were also tested.Results: The results supported the six factors model,and did not support the other three models established according to different theories.The Cronbach’s α of the questionnaire was 0.81 and the coefficient of stability of the questionnaire was 0.70 at six months interval;The correlations between 6 factors were -0.01-0.50,and all factor- total correlations were over 0.41.The correlations between each of the 6 factors and all items belonging to the corresponding factor were over 0.42.Conclusion: Supporting the six factors model of the SPQ;reliability and validity of the questionnaire meet the standard of psychometrics,but some items belonging to the factors of surface motivation and surface strategy still need to be modified in future.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Biggs J.Individual and groups differences in study processes.British Journal of Educational Psychology,1978,48:266-279
[2] Biggs J.Student approaches to learning and studying.Hawthorn:Australian Council for Educational Research,1987a
[3] Biggs J.Study process questionnaire manual.Hawthorn:Australian Council for Educational Research,1987b
[4] Watkins D,Astilla E.Some evidence on the reliability and validity of the Biggs Study Process Questionnaire with Filipino children.Australian Journal of Education,1982,26(1):104-106
[5] Albaili,Mohamed A.An Arabic version of the Study Process Questionnaire:Reliability and Validity.Psychological Re ports,1995,77(3):1083
[6] Liem AD,Prasetya PH.Preliminary Evidence for Validity of the Indonesian Version of Study Process Questionnaire.Psychological Reports,2007,100(1):333-338
[7] Huy PP,Bisun D.Approaches to Leaming in Educational Psychology and Mathematics:A Comparative Analysis in the South Pacific Region.Australian Association for Research in Education,2006.1-33
[8] Albert Yung-kwan Chan,David W.How Do Hang Kong Hospital-Based Student Nurses Learn?Educational Re search Journal,1995,10(1):54-59
[9] 雷雳.侯志瑾,自学军.不同年级高师学生的学习动机与学习策略.心理发展与教育,1997,(4):17-21
[10] 邓辉平.大学生学习动机程度特点的调查和实验研究.湖南师范大学硕士论文,2001
[11] 陈建文.青少年社会适应的理论与实证研究:结构、机制与功能.西南大学博士论文,2001
[12] 张亚玲,郭德俊.学习策略教学对学习动机的影响研究.心理科学,2001,24(3):352-353
[13] Paul CB,Barry CD.The Study Process Questionnaire:A construct validation study.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,2000,25(1):92-100
[14] Biggs JKD,Doris YPL.The revised two-factor Study Pro cess Questionnaire:R-SPQ-2F.British Journal of Educa tional Psychology,2001,71:133-149
[15] Peter Z.A Revision of the Biggs'Study Process Question naire(R-SPQ).Higher Education Research and Development,2002,2l(1):73-93
[16] 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用.北京:教育科学出版社,2004.71
[17] 郭永玉.人格心理学.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005.336

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】