中国临床心理学杂志

儿童抑郁量表在中意儿童中的测量等值性研究

作者：吴文峰¹ 2 卢永彪² 谭芙蓉¹ 姚树桥¹

单位：1. 中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理研究中心湖南长沙 410011
2. 湖南科技大学教育学院湖南湘潭 411201

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2010,18(6):707-710

摘要：

目的:检验儿童抑郁量表在中国和意大利学校儿童样本中的测量等值性,并比较量表各因子在中意儿童组之间的潜均值差异。方法:使用儿童抑郁量表调查550名中国2、3年级小学生和540名2、3年级意大利小学生,并对调查数据进行多组验证性因素分析。结果:对量表5因子结构的多组验证性因素分析表明,量表测量的完全等值性不被数据支持,应用拉格朗日乘数检验的进一步分析显示,21个设定等值的因素负荷中的4个,26个截距中的14个,26个测量误差中的11个跨组不等值;潜均数的跨组比较没有显示组间的显著性差异。结论:儿童抑郁量表的观察均值差异不能被潜均值完全解释,建议对儿童抑郁量表在不同国家人群中的测量结果谨慎衡量其差异大小。

Objective:To test the cross-cultural measurement invariance of Children's Depression Inventory and compare its latent means between Chinese children and Italian children.Methods:550 and 540 primary school students in grade 2 and 3 from China and Italy were investigated respectively,and Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses were made.Results:Multi-group confirmatory factor analyses of the original 5 factors identified by Kovacs revealed that full measurement invariance was not supported by the date,further analysis showed that 4 of 21 factor loadings,14 of 26 intercepts,and 11 of 26 item errors were noninvariant.Factor variance test displayed significant difference between Chinese sample and Italian sample;the latent factor mean comparison suggested that no significant difference between the two groups.Conclusion:The finding of partial metric and scalar invariance suggests that observed mean differences on the CDI items cannot be fully explained by the mean differences in the latent factor.It is suggested that researchers and practitioners should use it cautionsly when gauging the size of the true population differences of CDI.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Kovacs M. Children's depression inventory,manual[M].New York:Multi-Health Systems,Inc,2003.
[2] Jm TSN. Age,gender,race,socioeconomic status,and birthcohort differences on the children's depression inventory:A meta-analysis[M].J Abnorm Psycho,2002.578-588.
[3] Chan DW. Depressive symptoms and perceived competenceamong Chinese secondary school students in Hong Kong[J].Journal of Youth and Adolescence,1997,(03):303-319.
[4] Billiet J. Cross-cultural equivalence with structural equationmodeling[M].New Jersey:John Wiley and Sons Inc,2002.247-264.
[5] Little TD. Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analysesof cross -cultural data:Practical and theoretical issues[J].Multivariate Behavioral Research,1997,(01).doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3.
[6] Widaman KF,Reise SP. Exploring the measurement invari-ance of psychological instruments:Applications in the substance use domain[M].Washington,DC:American Psychological Association,1997.281-324.
[7] Steele RG,Stephen TDL. A confirmatory comparison of the factor structure of the children's depression inventory between European American and African American youth[J].Journal of Child and Family Studies,2006.779-794.doi:10.1007/s10826-006-9054-9.
[8] Kaplan D,George R. A study of the power associated with testing factor mean differences under violations of factorial invariance[J].Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisci -plinary Journal,1995,(02):101-118.
[9] 吴文峰,卢永彪,谭芙蓉. 儿童抑郁量表(CDI)中文版的信效度研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2010,(05).doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2010.10.014.
[10] Kovacs MCDI. Children's depression inventory[M].Manuale.Firenze:Organizzazioni Speciali,1988.
[11] Bentler PM. EQS6.1:Structural equations program manual[M].Encino,CA:Multivariate Software Inc,2005.
[12] Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with EQS[M].Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc,2006.
[13] Maccallum RC,Roznowski M,Necowitz LB. Model modifications in covariance structure analysis:The problem of capitalization on chance[J].Psychological Bulletin,1992,(03):490-504.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490.
[14] Satorra A,Bentler PM. Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference Chi-square test statistic[J].Psychometrika,2009.1-6.
[15] Byrne BM,Shavelson RJ,Muthén B. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures:The issue of partial measurement invariance[J].Psychological Bulletin,1989,(03):456-466.doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456.
[16] Guo X,Suarez-Morales L,Schwartz SJ. Some evidence for multidimensional biculturalism:Confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance analysis on the Bicultural Involvement Questionnaire-Short Version[J].Psychological Assessment,2009,(01):22-31.doi:10.1037/a0014495.
[17] Vandenberg RJ,Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature:Suggestions,practices,and recommendations for organizational research[J].Organizational Research Methods,2000,(01):4.doi:10.1177/109442810031002.
[18] Wan C,Fan C,Lin G. Comparison of personality traits of only and sibling school children in Beijing[J].Journal of Genetic Psychology,1994,(04):377-388.doi:10.1080/00221325.1994.9914788.
[19] Diener E,Diener M. Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1995,(04):653-663.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.653.
[20] Spencer-Rodgers J,Peng K,Wang L. Dialectical self-esteem and East-West differences in psychological well-being[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2004,(11):1416.doi:10.1177/0146167204264243.
[21] Heine SJ,Lehman DR,Markus HR. b there a universal need for positive self-regard[J].Psychological Review,1999,(04):766-794.doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766.
[22] Yen S,Robins CJ,Lin N. A cross-cultural comparison of depressive symptom manifestation:China and the United States[J].Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,2000,(06):993-999.doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.6.993.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】