中国临床心理学杂志

累惯犯暴力态度的实证研究

作者：关慕桢¹ 李晓京² 田步忍³ 张宝平³ 段卫杰³ 田京³ 闫虎³ 苗丹民¹ 刘旭峰¹

单位：1. 第四军医大学航空航天医学系心理学教研室陕西西安 710032
2. 第四军医大学航空航天医学系装备教研室陕西西安 710032
3. 陕西省庄里监狱

分类号：D917

出版年,卷(期):页码：2010,18(3):274-277

摘要：

目的：探讨累惯犯暴力态度特点及预测特征。方法：采用《FMMU变态人格危险性评估问卷》测量累惯犯的外显暴力态度：内隐联想测验(IAT)和阈下态度启动模式(AAP)测量累惯犯的内隐暴力态度。结果：结果显示，部分累惯犯的内隐暴力态度发生了反转。据此，将累惯犯分为反转组和未反转组。两组都产生了显著的IAT效应和启动效应：且暴力维度分值显著高于常模。结论：直接测量的方法可以将累惯犯从正常的群体中区分。若结合间接测量的方法，可以细化累惯犯分类，为累惯犯个性化处遇提供有力的依据。

Objective:To explore characteristic and violent attitude structure of recidivists.Methods:FMMU-Abnormal Personality Risk Factors Inventory(FMMU-APRI) was used to measure explicit attitude;as Implicit Association Test(IAT) and Attitude Activation Paradigm(AAP) were used to assess implicit attitude.Results:The results showed that implicit violent attitude had reversed effect in part of recidivists.According to reversed effect,the subjects were divided into no-reversal recidivists and reversal recidivists,each group had significant IAT effect and priming effect,while scores in VIO subscale were significantly higher than the normal.Conclusion:These results indicated that explicit measurement can distinguish recidivists from the normal,while implicit methods would categorize delicately,providing a strong evidence individually for treatment of recidivists.

基金项目：

总政治部保卫部重大专项课题“应征青年反社会变态人格倾向心理检测系统研究”(ZZBWB20060901)

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] 谢应霞.浅析累犯的概念.中共郑州市委党校学报,2006,82(4):119-120
[2] 马克昌.刑罚通论.武汉:武汉大学出版社,1999
[3] 沈玉忠.累犯“三振出局”制度之探讨.贵州大学学报,2007,25(3):61-65
[4] 陈泽宪.刑事法前沿.北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004.134
[5] Houin CR.罪犯评估与治疗手册必备手册.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2000.72
[6] Steadman HJ,Silver E,John M,et a1.A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools. Law and Human Behavior,2000,1:83-l00
[7] Anderson AC,Benjamin JA,Wood KP,Bonacci MA.Development and testing of the velicer attitudes toward violence scale:Evidence for a four-factor model.Aggressive Behavior,2006,32:122-136
[8] Funk J,Elliott R,Bechtoldt H.The attitudes toward violence scale.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,2003,18(2):186-196
[9] 张陆,佐斌,叶娜.IAT 上的属性类别标签效应研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(4):454-456
[10] 梁宁建,吴明证,高旭成.基于反应时范式的内隐社会认知研究方法.心理科学,2003,26(2):208-211
[11] 张林,张向葵.态度研究的新进展-双重态度模型.心理科学进展,2003,11(2):171-176
[12] Carolyn AS,Timothy OI,Terence PT.Adolescent maltreatment and its impact on young adult antisocial behavior.Child Abuse and Neglect,2005(29):1099-1119
[13] 于世忠.惯犯问题的研究.行政与法,1994,2:42-45
[14] Cowan NA,Owensl PA,McLloyd1 VP,Colin CR.Violent Behavior among South African Adolescents:A Study of the Risk and Protective Factors Preliminary Report,2000.10
[15] 高铭暄.刑法学.北京:北京大学出版社,1998.196
[16] 肖利军.中国士兵人格问卷的编制与应用.博士学位论文,2007.49
[17] Greenwald AG,Nosek BA,Banaji MR.Understanding and using the implicit association test:1.An improved scoring algorithm.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2003,85:197-215
[18] Fazio RH,Sambonmatsu DM,Powell MC,et al.On the automatic activation of attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,50:229-238
[19] 郭东.理性犯罪决策-成本收益模型.广西社会科学,2007,8:84-88
[20] Alexander JF.The criminal,the judge and the public.New York:Macmillan,1931.89

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】