中国临床心理学杂志

中文版道德推脱问卷的信效度研究

作者：王兴超¹ 杨继平¹ 2

单位：1. 山西大学教育科学学院山西太原 030006
2. 山西大学商务学院山西太原 030031

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2010,18(2):177-179

摘要：

目的：检验道德推脱问卷的信度和效度。方法：应用中文版道德推脱问卷对750名大学生进行了施测，以学术欺骗行为、道德认同为效标，检验问卷的各项信效度指标。结果：①探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析均支持问卷的八因素结构模型；②道德推脱问卷的总分与学术欺骗行为有显著的正相关(r=0.33，P＜0.001)，与道德认同有显著的负相关(r=-0.26，P＜0.001)；③总问卷的内部一致性α系数为0.87，分半信度系数为0.80。结论：道德推脱问卷具有良好的信效度，但某些条目还不适合中国人群，需要进一步修订。

Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Moral Disengagement Scale in Chinese student sample. Methods: The scales, composed of moral disengagement, moral identity and study performance, were used to assess 750 graduate students. Results: ①Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed the scale was composed of 8 factors; ② Cronbach’ s alpha of the MDS was 0.87, the split -half reliability was 0.80; ③ Moral disengagement was correlated positively with academic dishonesty behavior and negatively with moral identity. Conclusion: The MDS of Chinese version is found to have good psychometrics properties with adequate reliability and validity; however, several items of the scale are found to be unfit to the Chinese sample, and revision of them should be done in further studies.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] 刘霞，赵淑英，张跃兵.某市中学生校园暴力行为及相关因素分析.中国临床心理学杂志，2008，16(4)：420-422
[2] Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action:A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall，1986
[3] Bandura A. Moral disengagement in the preparation of inhumanities. Personal and Social Psychology Review，1999，3：193-209
[4] Bandura A,Barbaranelli C,Caprara GV,et al. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，1996，71：364-374
[5] Bandura A,Caprara GV,Barbaranelli C,et al. Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive be havior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，2001，80：125-135
[6] Bandura A,Barbaranelli C,Caprara GV,et al. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，1996，71(2)：364-374
[7] Bandura A,Barbaranelli C,Caprara GV,et al. Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development，1996，67(3)：1206-1222
[8] Paciello M,Fida R,Tramontano C,et al. Stability and change of moral disengagement and its impact on aggression and violence in late adolescence. Child Development，2008，79(5)：1288-1309
[9] Pelton J,Gound M,Forehand R,et al. The moral disengagement scale:Extension with an American minority sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment，2004，26(1)：31-39
[10] Kiriakidis SP. Moral disengagement relation to delinquency and independence from indices of social dysfunction. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology，2008，25(5)：571-583
[11] Detert JR,Trevi?o LK,Sweitzer VL. Moral disengagement in ethical decision making:A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology，2008，93(2)：374-391
[12] Hymel S,Henderson NR,Bonanno RA. Moral disengage ment:A framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences，2005，8：1-11
[13] McCabe D,Trevi?o LK. Academic dishonesty:Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Edu cation，1993，64：520-538
[14] Aquino K,Reed A. The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，2002，83：1423-1440
[15] 黄任之，姚树桥，邹涛.个人主义和集体主义量表中文版信度和效度的研究.中国临床心理学杂志，2006，14(6)：564-566

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】