中国临床心理学杂志

非理性拖延量表的修订及其与健康行为的关系:自我效能的中介作用

作者：倪士光¹ 2 徐继红² 叶霖³

单位：1. 哈尔滨工业大学威海校区心理教育中心山东威海 264209
2. 清华大学心理学系北京 100084
3. 安徽中医学院心理学教研室安徽合肥 230038

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2012,20(5):603-605

摘要：

目的:检验非理性拖延量表(IPS)在我国大学生群体中的适用性,并探讨自我效能在拖延与健康行为之间的中介作用。方法:采用IPS中译本,对348名本科生进行初测;将基于初测修订的IPS中文版与主动拖延量表(NAPS)、一般自我效能感量表(GSES)和自评健康行为量表(RHBC)一起在745名本科生中正式施测。结果:①项目分析之后的IPS的各项指标符合心理测量学要求(α系数为0.883,重测信度为0.822);与主动拖延的相关为-0.008(P>0.05),与学习成绩的相关为-0.220(P<0.05))。②自我效能是拖延影响健康行为的中介变量,其中介效应为0.044,中介效应占总效应的比例为36.2%。结论:中文版IPS具有较好的信、效度。在大学生消极拖延对健康行为的影响中,自我效能起了部分中介作用。

Objective: To examine the applicability of Irrational Procrastination Scale (IPS) in Chinese college students and the mediating effects of self-efficacy in the relationship between negative procrastination and health behavior. Methods: A sample of 348 undergraduates completed the preliminary Chinese version of IPS. Another sample of 745 under-graduates completed a battery of structured questionnaires including the final Chinese version of IPS, a New Active Procrastination Scale(NAPS), General Self-efficacy Scale(GSES) and Self-reported Health Behavior Scale(RHBS). Results: ①All psychometric indices of the revised IPS were satisfactory(the Cronbach α index was 0.883, retest reliability was 0.822),while there was no significant relationship between negative procrastination and active procrastination. ②The relationship between procrastination and health behavior was mediated by self-efficacy, and its mediating effect was 0.044, which accounted for 36.2% of the total effect. Conclusion: The IPS has good reliably and validitly and could be suitable for measuring procrastination of undergraduate students. Self-efficacy played mediating roles between negative procrastination and different levels of health behavior.

基金项目：

2012年度山东省教育厅高等学校人文社科项目(J12WH103);清华大学自主科研计划课题(2010THZ04)

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Van Eerde W. A meta-analytically derived nomological net-work of procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 2003, 35(6): 1401-1418
[2] Ferrari JR, O' Callaghan J, New begin I. Prevalence of procrastination in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia: Arousal and avoidance delays among adults. North American Journal of Psychology, 2005, 7(3): 1-6
[3] Ferrari J, Ozer B, Demir A. Chronic procrastination among Turkish adults: Exploring decisional, avoidant, and arousalstyles. The Journal of Social Psychology, 2009, 149(3): 302-307
[4] Steel P. The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 2007, 133(1): 65-94
[5] Steel P. Arousal, avoidant and decisional procrastinators: Dothey exist? Personality and Individual Differences, 2010, 48(8): 926-934
[6] McCrea SM, Liberman N, Trope Y, Sherman SJ. Construal level and procrastination. Psychological Science, 2008, 19(10): 1308-1314
[7] 张红梅，张志杰. Tuckman 拖延量表在中国大学生中试用结果分析. 中国临床心理学杂志，2007,15(1)：10-12
[8] 陈小莉，戴晓阳，董琴. Aitken 拖延问卷在大学生中的应用研究. 中国临床心理学杂志，2008,16(1)：22-23,76
[9] Sirois FM. “ I' ll look after my health, later ”: A replication and extension of the procrastination -health model with community-dwelling adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 2007, 43(11): 15-26
[10] Sirois FM. Procrastination and intentions to perform health behaviors: The role of self-efficacy and the consideration of future consequences. Personality and Individual Differences.2004, 37(1): 115-128
[11] 倪士光，李虹，徐继红，Choi JN. 主动拖延量表在中国大学生群体中的修订及信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志，2011,19(4)：512-515
[12] 王才康，胡中锋，刘勇. 一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究. 应用心理学，2001,7(1)：37-40
[13] 张澜，沈丹丹，胡佩诚. 新加坡中国留学生和北京大学学生的觉察压力、社会支持，健康行为比较. 中国心理卫生杂志，2010,24(4)：319-320
[14] Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173-1182
[15] 田芊，邓士昌. 积极完美主义对拖延行为的影响: 自我效能感的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志，2011,19(2)：221-224

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】