中国临床心理学杂志

中国人抑郁易感人格的特点与结构初探

作者：徐华春¹ 2 黄希庭² 陈传锋³ 胡珍玉⁴

单位：1. 四川师范大学教师教育学院四川成都 610068
2. 西南大学心理学院重庆 400715
3. 宁波大学心理学系浙江宁波 315211
4. 宁波市康宁医院

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2012,20(4):427-433

摘要：

目的:在中国文化情境下,探索中国人抑郁易感人格的特点与结构。方法:在国内外相关文献基础上,首先将国内有抑郁症病史者作为中国抑郁易感个体的典型代表,以临床咨询经验丰富的精神科医师为主要调查对象,通过深度访谈和开放式问卷调查探索中国人抑郁易感人格特征;在此基础上形成原始项目,在一般大学生和有抑郁症病史者被试基础上探索并验证中国人抑郁易感人格结构;最后对一般大学生进行追踪研究,初步考察中国人抑郁易感人格与压力交互作用对抑郁症状的影响。结果:中国人抑郁易感人格是一个5因素结构,具体包括敏感好胜、封闭防御、自我专注、严谨认真和退让顺从;验证性因素分析结果表明,中国人抑郁易感人格问卷的5因素模型拟合较好;总量表及各维度内部一致性系数在0.60-0.78之间;量表总体及其各维度可以有效区分有抑郁病史大学生和无抑郁病史大学生,它们与应激的交互作用能有效预测大学生三个月后的抑郁症状。结论:中国人抑郁易感人格是一个五因素结构,中国人抑郁易感人格量表具有良好的心理测量学指标,能够有效筛查中国抑郁易感个体。

Objective: To explore the structure of vulnerable personality to depression of Chinese people and correspondingly to develop a scale to measure Chinese people's vulnerable personality to depression. Methods: People who had once suffered from MDD were selected as the typical individuals with vulnerable personality, and seasoned psychiatrists were investigated by using an interview technique and an open-ended questionnaire. Then, data were collected from 437 persons who had a history of MDD and 1378 normal college students were measured; EFA and CFA were used to test the reliability and validity of the scale. In particular, 419 of the college students completed the measures assessing depressive symptoms twice with a three-month interval. Results: The Questionnaire of Chinese Vulnerable Personality to Depression (QCVPD) was formed with 49 items in total and five factors, i.e. emulousness, defensiveness, self-absorption, preciseness,and compliance. The internal consistencies of this scale ranged from 0.60 to 0.78, and test-retest reliabilities ranged from 0.64 to 0.80. Normal college students and participants with history of MDD differed on each dimension of the QCVPD significantly. Finally, the interaction between the five factors and stress could well predict the college students' levels of depressive symptoms. Conclusion: Chinese Vulnerable Personality to Depression includes 5 factors, and the QCVPD is a reliable and valid measure, which can be used in future researches.

基金项目：

四川师范大学校基金面上项目(09MSW02);四川应用心理学研究中心项目(CSXL-092026);四川省哲学社科基地项目(SC11E001);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(09YJAXLX013);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(05JZD00031)

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Scher CD,Ingram RE,Segal ZV. Cognitive reactivity and vulnerability:Empirical evaluation of construct activation and cognitive diatheses in unipolar depression[J].Clinical Psychology Review,2005.487-510.
[2] 邹涛,姚树桥. 抑郁认知易感性应激模式的研究:起源、发展和整合[J].心理科学进展,2006.762-768.
[3] Zuroff DC,Mongrain M,Santor DA. Conceptualizing and measuring personality vulnerability to depression:Comment on Coyne and Whiffen (1995)[J].Psychological Bulletin,2004.489-511.
[4] 徐华春,黄希庭,柳春香,程科. 抑郁的人格易感性:概念、理论与发展[J].心理科学进展,2009.370-376.
[5] Zuroff DC,Moskowitzl DS,Wielgus MS,Powers TA. Construct validation of the dependency and self-criticism scales of the depressive experiences questionnaire[J].Journal of Research in Personality,1983.226-241.
[6] Klein DN. The depressive experiences Questionnaire:A further evaluation[J].Journal of Personality Assessment,1989.703-715.
[7] 方建群,姚树桥. 抑郁体验问卷中文版在640名大学生中的信效度检验及两种评分系统比较[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2008.184-188.
[8] Clark DA,Steer RA,Beck AT,Ross L. Psychometric characteristics of revised sociotropy and autonomy scales in college students[J].Behaviour Research and Therapy,1995.325-334.
[9] Bieling PJ,Beck AT,Brown GK. The sociotropy-autonomy scale:Structure and implications[J].Cognitive Therapy and Research,2000.356-390.
[10] Robins CJ,Ladd J,Welkowitz J,Blaney PH. The personal style inventory:Preliminary validation studies of new measures of sociotropy and autonomy[J].Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment,1994.277-300.
[11] Abu-Kaf S,Priel B. Dependent and Self-critical vulnerabilities to depression in two different cultural contexts[J].Personality and Individual Differences,2008.689-700.
[12] Kuwabara H,Sakado K,Sakado M. The Japanese version of the depressive experiences questionnaire:Its reliability and validity for lifetime depression in a working population[J].Comprehensive Psychiatry,2004.311-315.
[13] 唐秋萍,周甄会,廖莎,朱熊兆. 依赖、自我批评人格特质与抑郁症状的关系[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2011,(01):105-107.
[14] 王登峰,崔红. 中西方人格结构差异的理论与实证分析-以中国人人格量表(QZPS)和西方五因素人格量表(NEOPI2R)为例[J].心理学报,2008.327-338.
[15] 张建新,周明洁. 中国人人格结构探索-人格特质六因素假说[J].心理科学进展,2006.574-585.
[16] 戴琴,冯正直,赵晓晶. 抑郁与A型行为关系研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,(02):237-239.
[17] 周亚娟,梁宝勇. 无条件自我接纳在大学生完美主义与抑郁间的中介作用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2011,(03):350-352.
[18] 洪炜,姬雪松,马晓军. 抑郁障碍患者人格特征与发病关系的研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2004.502-503.
[19] 姚树桥,罗英姿,杨娟. 大学生神经质人格对抑郁症状的影响:一年追踪研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,(05):598-604.
[20] 王登峰,崔红. 人格维度、自我和谐及行为抑制与心身症状的关系[J].心理学报,2007.861-873.
[21] Cheung FM. Indigenous personality correlates from the CPAI-2 profiles of Chinese psychiatric patients[J].World Culture Psychiatry Research Review,2007.114-117.
[22] 林芳,周霞,张岚. 抑郁障碍患者与焦虑障碍患者的个性测定比较[J].上海精神医学,2005.285-287.
[23] 温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特. 结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004.186-194.
[24] 汪向东. 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].北京:《中国心理卫生杂志》杂志社,1999.106-202.
[25] 周美伶,何友晖. 从跨文化的观点分析面子的内涵及其在社会交往中的运作[A].中国台北:桂冠图书公司,1993.232-234.

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】