|
目的:编制成年初期(18-25岁)大学生自主量表,验证中国被试的多维自主结构。方法:运用开放式问卷、半结构访谈和内容分析相结合的质性研究方法,与探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析等相结合的量化研究方法,对884名中国大学生进行调查。结果:成年初期大学生自主量表由20个项目构成,包含四个维度(自我主张、自我依靠、自我控制和自我决断)。验证性因素分析表明该量表具有较好的拟合指标(χ2/df=2.512,NFI=0.92,NNFI=0.95,CFI=0.95,RMSEA=0.061),总量表及各维度的内部一致性为0.868~0.636,重测信度为0.831-0.703;总分与维度(0.901~0.635)以及各维度间(0.664~0.161)显著相关,总分和各维度与效标GSES(0.528~0.164)显著相关。结论:中国大学生的自主结构是多维的,成年初期大学生自主量表具有良好的信效度。
|
|
Objective: To develop College Students' Autonomy Scale in Emerging Adulthood(CSAS-EA), and to test the multi-dimensional structure of autonomy. Methods: Qualitative research methods, including open questionnaire, semistructured interview and content analysis, and quantitative research methods, such as exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, were used in this study. 884 Chinese college students aged between 18 and 25 years were surveyed in the research. Results: CASA-EA included 20 items and was composed of four dimensions including self-assertion, self-reliance, self-control, and self-decision. Confirmatory factor analysis shows the scale had good fit index: χ2/df=2.512, NFI= 0.92, NNFI=0.95, CFI=0.95, RMSEA=0.061. The internal consistency of CSAS-EA and the four dimensions were 0.868~ 0.636, and test-retest coefficients for CSAS-EA was 0.806. There were significant positive correlation between total score and four dimensions(0.901~0.635) and among dimensions(0.664~0.161). The CSAS-EA total score and four dimensions were significantly correlated with the criterion GSES(0.528~0.164). Conclusion: The structure of Chinese College students' autonomy has a multi-dimensional structure, and good psychometric property.
|
|
1 Collins WA, Steinberg L. Adolescent development in inter-personal context. In Damon W, Lerner R, Eisenberg N. Ha-ndbook of child psychology：Social, emotional, and person-ality development). New York: Wiley, 2006. 1003-1067
2 Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psycholo-gist, 2000, 55(5): 469-480
3 Magolda B. Developing self-authorship in young adult life. Journal of College Student Development, 1998, 39(2): 143-156
4 Beyers W, Goossens L. Psychological separation and adjust-ment to college: Moderating effects of gender, age, and per-ceived parenting style. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2003, 18(4): 363-382
5 Hmel BA, Pincus AL. The meaning of autonomy: On and be-yond the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality, 2002, 70(3): 277-310
6 Murray HA. Explorations in personality: A clinical and ex-perimental study of fifty men of college age. New York: Ox-ford, 1938
7 Gough H, Heilbrun AL. The revised adjective checklist ma-nual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983
8 Steinberg L, Silverberg SB. The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 1986, 57(4): 841-851
9 Deci EL, Ryan RM. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 1985, 19(2): 109-134
10 Wiggins JS. Agency and communion as conceptual coordi-nates for the understanding and measurement of interperson-al behavior. In Meehl PE, Grove W, Cicchetti D. Thinking clearly about psychology:Essays. College of Minnesota Press: Minnesota, 1991. 89-113
11 Anderson RA, Worthington L，Anderson WT, et al. The de-velopment of an autonomy scale. Contemporary Family Ther-apy, 1994, 16(4): 329-345
12 Noom MJ, Dekov? M, Meeus W. Conceptual analysis and measurement of adolescent autonomy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2001, 30(5): 577-595
13 Beyers W, Goossens L，Vansant I, et al. A structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: Connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2003, 32(5): 351-365
14 Beck A, Epstein N, Harrison RP, et al. Development of the sociotropy-autonomy scale: A measure of personality factors in psychopathology. Unpublished manuscript. Philadelphia: College of Pennsylvania, 1983
15 Feldman SS, Rosenthal DA. The acculturation of autonomy expectations in Chinese high schoolers residing in two West-ern nations. International Journal of Psychology, 1990, 25 (3): 259-281
16 Chirkov V, Ryan RM, Kim Y, et al. Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholo-gy, 2003, 84(1): 97-110
17 Yau J, Smetana JG. Adolescent-parent conflict among Chi-nese adolescents in Hong Kong. Child Development, 1996, 67(3): 1262-1275
18 陆洛. 人我关系之界定—— “折衷自我” 的现身. 台北：本土心理学研究，2003，20：139-207
19 邹晓燕，杨丽珠. 3~ 5 岁儿童独立性结构的验证性因素分析. 心理科学，2005，28(1)：225-226
20 姚丹. 大学生自主性的结构及发展特点研究. 硕士学位论文. 沈阳师范大学，2007
21 凌辉，黄希庭. 6—12岁儿童自立行为结构的初步研究. 中国临床心理学杂志，2006，14(3)：233-236
22 夏凌翔，黄希庭. 青少年学生自立人格量表的信度与效度. 心理科学，2009，32(4)：952-954
23 邹晓燕，贾玉梅. 初中生自主性结构及其发展特点研究. 教育科学，2008，24(5)：50-54
24 韦炜. 青少年独立能力的量表编制与现状测查研究. 硕士学位论文. 福建师范大学，2008
25 王才康，刘勇. 一般自我效能感与特质焦虑、 状态焦虑和考试焦虑的相关研究. 中国临床心理学杂志，2000，8(4)：229-230
26 Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-regulation and the problem of hu-man autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determi-nation, and will? Journal of Personality, 2006, 74(6): 1557-1586
27 Smetana JG, Asquith P. Adolescents' and parents' concep-tions of parental authority and personal autonomy. Child De-velopment,1994, 65: 1147-1162
28 Steinberg L. Autonomy, conflict, and harmony in the family relationship. At the threshold: The developing adolescent. Cambridge, MA: Howard University Press, 1990. 255-277
|