|
目的:考察大学生手机依赖与人格特征、社交焦虑之间的关系。方法:采用手机依赖评定量表(MPAI),中国大五人格简版(CBF-PI-B),社交焦虑量表(IAS)对493名大学生集体施测,用SPSS17.0进行数据分析。结果:27.6%的大学生存在手机依赖,相比无手机依赖的大学生,有手机依赖者的神经质、社交焦虑得分呈显著更高(P<0.05),外向性、开放性、宜人性和严谨性的得分显著更低(P<0.05)。神经质、社交焦虑与手机依赖显著正相关(r=0.307,P<0.001),严谨性,宜人性与手机依赖呈显著负相关(r=-0.213,r=-0.123,P<0.001)。社交焦虑分别在神经质、严谨性与手机依赖的关系之间起部分中介的作用,中介效应分别为27.2%、13.6%。结论:社交焦虑在大学生人格特征和手机依赖关系中起部分中介作用。
|
|
Objective: To Explore the association of mobile phone addiction with personality and social anxiety in col-lege students. Methods: By using measurement survey method, investigation was conducted among 493 college students.They were assessed with the Mobile Phone Addiction Index Scale(MPAI), the Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory briefversion(CBF-PI-B) and the Interaction Anxiousness Scale(IAS). Results: Twenty-seven point five percent of the studentswere addicted to mobile phone. The students being addicted to mobile phone got higher scores on Neuroticism and IAS(P<0.05), lower scores on Extraversion, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness(P<0.05), compared to other students without ad-diction to mobile phone. The scores on Mobile phone addiction were positively associated with Neuroticism(r=0.307, P<0.001), and negatively associated with Conscientiousness and Agreeableness(r=-0.213, r=-0.123, P<0.001). IAS partiallymediated the association of mobile phone addiction with Neuroticism and Conscientiousness, and the mediating effect ofwhich were 27.2% and 13.6% respectively. Conclusion: Our findings may support the partial mediating role of IAS in therelationship between mobile phone addiction and personality.
|
|
1 Yen C, Tang T, Yen J, et al. Symptoms of problematic cellular phone use, functional impairment and its association with depression among adolescents in Southern Taiwan. Journal of Adolescence, 2009, 32(4): 863-873
2 黄海，周春燕，余莉. 大学生手机依赖与心理健康的关系.中国学校卫生，2013，34(9)：1074-1076
3 刘红，王洪礼. 大学生的手机依赖倾向与孤独感. 中国心理卫生杂志，2012，26(1)：66-69
4 Jenaro C, Flores N, Gómez-Vela M, et al. Problematic internet and cell-phone use: Psychological, behavioral, and health correlates. Addiction Research and Theory, 2007, 15(3):309-320
5 Leung L. Leisure boredom, sensation seeking, self-esteem,and addiction. Mahwah,Nj: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,2008
6 Kasesniemi E, Rautiainen P. Mobile culture of children and teenagers in Finland//Perpetual contact. Cambridge University Press, 2002. 170-192
7 Igarashi T, Motoyoshi T, Takai J, et al. No mobile, no life:Self-perception and text-message dependency among Japanese high school students. Computers in Human Behavior,2008, 24(5): 2311-2324
8 Bianchi A, Phillips J G. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 2005, 8(1): 39-51
9 徐华，吴玄娜，兰彦婷，等. 大学生手机依赖量表的编制.中国临床心理学杂志，2008，16(1)：26-27
10 Ehrenberg A, Juckes S, White KM, et al. Personality and self-esteem as predictors of young people' s technology use.CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2008,11(6):739-741
11 黄海，余莉，郭诗卉. 大学生手机依赖与大五人格的关系.中国学校卫生，2013，34(4)：414-416
12 Butt S, Phillips JG. Personality and self reported mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2008, 24(2):346-360
13 Ezoe S, Toda M, Yoshimura K, et al. Relationships of personbality and lifestyle with mobile phone dependence among female nursing students. Social Behavior and Personality:An International Journal, 2009, 37(2): 231-238
14 Billieux J, Van Der Linden M, Rochat L. The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2008, 22(9): 1195-1210
15 Joinson AN. Self-esteem, interpersonal risk, and preference for e-mail to face-to-face communication. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2004, 7(4): 472-478
16 Ha JH, Chin B, Park DH, et al. Characteristics of excessive cellular phone use in Korean adolescents. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 2008, 11(6): 783-784
17 Whiteside SP, Lynam DR. The five factor model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 2001, 30(4): 669-689
18 Norton GR, Cox BJ, Hewitt PL, et al. Personality factors associated with generalized and non-generalized social anxiety.Personality and Individual Differences, 1997, 22(5): 655-660
19 李波，钟杰，钱铭怡. 大学生社交焦虑易感性的回归分析.中国心理卫生杂志，2003，17(2)：109-112
20 雷雳，柳铭心. 青少年的人格特征与互联网社交服务使用偏好的关系. 心理学报，2005，37(6)：797-802
21 王孟成，戴晓阳，姚树桥. 中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅲ ：简式版的制定及信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志，2011，19(4)：454-457
22 汪向东. 心理卫生评定量表手册. 增订版. 北京：中国心理卫生杂志社，1999
23 彭纯子，龚耀先，朱熊兆. 交往焦虑量表的信效度及其在中国大学生中的适用性. 中国心理卫生杂志，2004，18(1)：39-41
24 温忠麟，侯杰泰，张雷. 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用. 心理学报，2005，37(2)：268-274
25 周晖，钮丽丽，邹泓. 中学生人格五因素问卷的编制. 心理发展与教育，2000，16(1)：48-54
26 Burger Jerry M. 人格心理学. 中国轻工业出版社，2004
27 Jensen-Campbell LA, Malcolm KT. The importance of conscientiousness in adolescent interpersonal relationships.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2007, 33(3):368-383
|