中国临床心理学杂志

词汇的概念义和情绪义加工的时间进程研究

作者：刘宏艳¹ 胡治国² 3

单位：1 浙江理工大学心理学系杭州 310018
2 杭州师范大学认知与脑疾病研究中心杭州 310015
3 浙江省认知障碍评估技术研究重点实验室杭州 310015

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2013,21(3):349-352

摘要：

目的:对词汇的概念义和情绪义加工的时间进程进行直接的对比研究。方法:以50名健康大学生为被试,采用一种特殊的词汇——双意义情绪词,通过设置不同的SOA条件(50毫秒和300毫秒),同时考察了词汇的语义启动和情绪启动效应,要求被试进行词汇判断任务。结果:在短SOA(50毫秒)条件下,词汇的语义启动效应和情绪启动效应均显著,且两者之间无显著差异;在长SOA(300毫秒)条件下,词汇的语义启动效应显著,但未发现情绪启动效应。结论:词汇概念义的加工同时包括了自动化和控制性的加工过程,而情绪义的加工只包含了自动化的加工过程,表明词汇的概念义和情绪义加工具有不同的时间进程。

Objective: To directly compare the time course of the conceptual semantic and affective semantic process ing of words using the comparative approach. Methods: Fifty healthy college students participated in the experiment. A special type of words, named dual-meaning words, which had both conceptual meaning and affective meaning, were used. We adopted simultaneously the semantic priming and affective priming paradigm with a short (50 ms) and long (300 ms) SOA (stimulus onset asynchrony). The subjects were asked to perform a lexical decision task. Results: At the short SOA condition, there were both significant semantic and significant affective priming effects. But at the long SOA condition, on ly significant semantic priming effect was found. Conclusion: These findings suggest that conceptual semantic processing of words contains both automatic and controlled processes, but affective semantic processing is more an automatic one, in dicating different time courses of the conceptual and affective semantic processing of words.

基金项目：

国家自然科学基金(31200846,31271195);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC190022);浙江理工大学科研启动基金(1113822-Y)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Liu HY, Hu ZG, Peng DL, et al. Common and segregatedneural substrates for automatic conceptual and affectivepriming as revealed by event-related functional magneticresonance imaging. Brain and Language, 2010, 112 (2):121-128
2 Neely J. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In Bes-ner D, Humphreys G. Basic processing in reading: visualword recognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991
3 Mummery CJ, Shallice T, Price CJ. Dual-process model insemantic priming: A functional imaging perspective. Neu roImage, 1999, 9(5): 516-525
4 Rossell SL, Price CJ, Nobre AC. The anatomy and timecourse of semantic priming investigated by fMRI and ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 2003, 41(5): 550-564
5 Klauer KC, RoBnagel C, Musch J. List-context effects inevaluative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology,1997, 23(1): 246-255
6 Hermans D, De Houwer J, Eelen P. A time course analysisof the affective priming effect. Cognition and Emotion, 2001,15(2): 143-165
7 Arnold M. Emotion and Personality. New York: ColumbiaUniversity Press, 1960
8 Zajonc RB. On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist,1984, 39(2): 117-123
9 Storbeck J, Robinson MD. Preferences and inferences in en-coding visual objects: A systematic comparison of semanticand affective Priming. Personality and Social PsychologyBulletin, 2004, 30(1): 81-93
10 Copland DA, de Zubicaray GI, McMahon K, et al. Brainactivity during automatic semantic priming revealed byevent-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neu-roImage, 2003, 20(1): 302-310
11 De Houwer J. A structural analysis of indirect measures ofattitudes. In Musch J, Klauer KC. The psychology of evalu-ation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion. Mah-wah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003
12 彭晓哲，周晓林.情绪信息与注意偏向.心理科学进展，2005，13(4): 488-496
13 Luo Q, Peng DL, Jin Z, et al. Emotional valence of wordmodulates the subliminal repetition priming effect in the leftfusiform gyrus: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage,2004, 21(1): 414-421
14 Bower GH. Mood congruity of social judgements. In ForgasJ. Emotion and social judgments. Oxford: Pergamon, 1991
15 Öhman A. As fast as the blink of an eye: Evolutionary pre-paredness for preattentive processing of threat. In Lang PJ,Simons RF, et al. Attention and orienting: Sensory and mo-tivational processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997
16 Bower GH. Mood and memory. American Psychologist,1981, 36(2): 129-148

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】