中国临床心理学杂志

部分线索效应对目击证人辨认的影响

作者：孙芮张冠宇李洁璿侯晓冯啸高峰强韩磊

单位：1. 山东师范大学心理学院济南 250358 2. 中国科学院心理研究所北京 100101 3. Teachers College Columbia University New York US

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(5):824-827

摘要：

目的：研究采用模拟目击证人辨认范式考察部分线索效应对目击证人队列识别的影响。方法：采用3（线索条件：无线索、场景线索、人物线索）×2（罪犯是否在列：罪犯在列、不在列）混合设计，主要考察不同线索条件对再认正确率的影响。结果：场景线索下面孔再认正确率低于无线索和人物线索条件下的再认正确率，无线索条件下的正确率显著低于人物线索条件下的再认正确率。结论：该研究证明在目击证人辨认中也存在部分线索效应。该结论对场景记忆以及司法指认过程都具有重要的启示和较高的实践价值。

Aim: This research examined the influence of part-list cuing effect on accuracy of eyewitness identification by mock eyewitness paradigm. Methods: 3(clue condition:no clue; scene clue; person clue)×2(crime-present; crime-ab-sent) mixed design was employed. Results: Recognizing accuracy of scene clue was significantly lower than accuracy of no clue and person clue; accuracy of no clue was significantly lower than person clue. Summary: Part-list cuing effect exists in eyewitness identification. This result not only has implications for scene memory and judicial identification procedure, but for practice value as well.

基金项目：

中国博士后科学基金第59批面上资助项目（2016M591205），山东省自然科学基金青年项目(ZR2015CQ010)及应用心理学名校工程资助

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Slamecka NJ. An examination of trace storage in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 76(76):504-513
2 Brown J. Reciprocal facilitation and impairment of free recall. Psychonomic Science, 1968, 10(2):41-42
3 Matt Serra, Karl M Oswald. Part-List Cuing of Associative Chains:Tests of Strategy Disruption. The Journal of General Psychology, 2006, 133(3):301-317
4 Basden DR, Basden BH. Some tests of the strategy disruption interpretation of part-list cuing inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 1995, 21 (6):1656-1669
5 Anderson MC, Bjork RA, Bjork EL. Remembering can cause forgetting:retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 1994, 20(5):1063
6 Aslan A, Bäuml KH. Part-list cuing with and without itemspecific probes:the role of encoding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2007, 14(3):489
7 刘希平, 石英, 唐卫海. 部分线索效应的作用机制. 心理科学, 2011, 1:82-87
8 Brewer N, Wells GL. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification:Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 2006, 12(1):11-30
9 Sauer JD, Brewer DN, Wells GL. Is there a magical time boundary for diagnosing eyewitness identification accuracy in sequential line-ups?. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2008, 13(1):123-135
10 Tredoux C. Statistical considerations when determining measures of lineup size and lineup bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1999, 13(1):9-26
11 Meissner CA, Tredoux CG, Parker JF, et al. Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups:A dualprocess signal detection theory analysis. Memory & Cognition, 2005, 33(5):783-792
12 Wells GL. What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 1993, 48(5):572-580
13 Dobolyi DG, Dodson CS. Eyewitness confidence in simultaneous and sequential lineups:a criterion shift account for sequential mistaken identification overconfidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied, 2013, 19(4):345-357
14 Pozzulo JD, Reed J, Pettalia J, et al. Simultaneous, Sequential, Elimination, and Wildcard:A Comparison of Lineup Procedures. Journal of Police & Criminal Psychology, 2016, 31(1):71-80
15 Aslan A, Bauml KH. The role of item similarity in part-list cueing impairment. Memory, 2009, 17(7):697
16 毋嫘, 林冰心. 高特质焦虑个体对负性情绪信息注意偏向的机制探讨. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2016, 24(6):992-995
17 章淑慧, 钟毅平, 阳威. 情景线索对运动员内隐攻击性的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2012, 20(5):639-641

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】