中国临床心理学杂志

冗思反应量表简版在抑郁症状阴性和阳性大学生人群中的测量等值性

作者：雷小霞钟明天席畅刘莹凌宇蚁金瑶

单位：1. 中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理中心长沙 410011 2. 华南师范大学心理学院广州 510631 3. 湖南农业大学教育学院长沙 410128

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2018,26(1):39-42

摘要：

目的：检验冗思反应量表简版（10-item Ruminative Response Scale，RRS-10）在抑郁症状阴性和阳性大学生人群中的测量等值性，并探讨抑郁与冗思的关系。方法：7842名中国在校大学生完成了RRS-10和流调中心抑郁量表（Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale，CES-D）。根据CES-D的划界分，有7347名大学生为抑郁阴性组，495名为抑郁阳性组。结果：单组验证性因素分析结果表明RRS-10的两因子结构在抑郁症状阳性组和阴性组样本中均拟合良好。多群组验证性因素分析的结果表明RRS-10在抑郁症状阳性组和阴性组两样本间达到部分等值。独立样本t检验结果表明抑郁症状阳性组在冗思总体水平、沉思因子及反思因子上的得分显著高于抑郁阴性组。结论：RRS-10在抑郁阳性组和阴性组两样本间具有部分等值性。抑郁阳性个体的冗思水平显著高于抑郁阴性个体。

Objective:This study aimed to test the measurement equivalence of the Chinese version of the 10-item Ru-minative Response Scale(RRS-10) across groups with screen-negative or screen-positive depressive symptoms in a large Chinese undergraduate sample. Methods:A total of 7,842 university students finished the RRS-10 and the Center for Epi-demiological Studies Depression Scale(CES-D). According to the cut-off score of CES-D, 7,347 subjects were classified as group with screen-negative depressive symptoms, and 495 subjects were classified as screen-positive group with depres-sive symptoms, respectively. Results:A two-factor model of RRS-10 fit the data reasonably both in group with screen-neg-ative or screen-positive depressive symptoms. And the RRS-10 was equivalent across these two groups. Besides, group with screen-positive depressive symptoms had higher rumination scores than group with screen-negative depressive symp-toms. Conclusion:The Chinese version of the RRS-10 had measurement equivalence across groups with screen-negative or screen-positive depressive symptoms in Chinese undergraduates. In addition, individuals with screen-positive depres-sive symptoms show more rumination than those with screen-negative depressive symptoms.

基金项目：

国家自然科学基金（81370034）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Nolen-Hoeksema S. Sex differences in unipolar depression:evidence and theory. Psychol Bull, 1987, 101(2):259-282
2 Morrow J, S Nolen-Hoeksema. Effects of responses to depression on the remediation of depressive affect. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1990, 58(3):519-527
3 Nolen-Hoeksema S, J Morrow. A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster:the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1991, 61(1):115-121
4 Nolen-Hoeksema S. Responses to Depression and Their Effects on the Duration of Depressive Episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1991, 100(4):569-582
5 Joormann J, M Dkane, IH Gotlib. Adaptive and maladaptive components of rumination? Diagnostic specificity and relation to depressive biases. Behav Ther, 2006, 37(3):269-280
6 Lyubomirsky S, et al. Thinking about rumination:the scholarly contributions and intellectual legacy of Susan NolenHoeksema. Annu Rev Clin Psychol, 2015, 11:1-22
7 Sakakibara R, M Kitahara. The relationship between Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire(CERQ) and depression, anxiety:Meta-analysis. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 2016, 87 (2):179-185
8 肖晶, 等. 大学生冗思与抑郁的关系:具体性自传体记忆降低的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23(6):1056-1057+1060
9 罗黄金. 大学生正念、冗思与心理健康的关系研究. 中南大学, 2014
10 邱平, 等. 大学生正念对冗思和负性情绪的调节作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2013, 7:1088-1090
11 彭萍. 高一学生冗思对抑郁症状的影响. 中南大学, 2010
12 Treynor W, R Gonzalez, S Nolen-Hoeksema. Rumination reconsidered:A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2003, 27(3):247-259
13 Jose PE, KF Weir. How is Anxiety Involved in the Longitudinal Relationship between Brooding Rumination and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2013, 42(8):1210-1222
14 Thanoi W, P Klainin-Yobas. Assessing rumination response style among undergraduate nursing students:A construct validation study. Nurse Educ Today, 2015, 35(5):641-646
15 Lee S, W Kim. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the revised korean version of ruminative response scale. Psychiatry Investig, 2014, 11(1):59-64
16 Extremera N, P Fernandez-Berrocal. Validity and reliability of Spanish versions of the Ruminative Responses ScaleShort Form and the Distraction Responses Scale in a sample of Spanish high school and college students. Psychol Rep, 2006, 98(1):141-150
17 Lei X, et al. Psychometric Properties of the 10-item Ruminative Response Scale in Chinese University Students. BMC Psychiatry, 2017, 17:152
18 French BF, WH Finch. Confirmatory Factor Analytic Procedures for the Determination of Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2006, 13(3):378-402
19 Radloff LS. The CES-D scale:A self-reported depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychology Measures, 1977, 1:385-394
20 Radloff LS. The use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in adolescents and young adults. J Youth Adolesc, 1991, 20(2):149-166
21 章婕, 吴振云, 方格, 等. 流调中心抑郁量表全国城市常模的建立. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2010, 24(2):139-143
22 Xiao J, et al.‘Weakest Link’as a Cognitive Vulnerability Within the Hopelessness Theory of Depression in Chinese University Students. Stress and health:journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 2016, 32(1):20-27
23 Flora DB, PJ Curran. An Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Estimation for Confirmatory Factor Analysis With Ordinal Data. Psychological Methods, 2004, 9(4):466-491
24 Hu Lt, PM Bentler. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999, 6(1):1-55
25 Meredith W. Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 1993, 58(4):525-543
26 Xavier A, M Cunha, J Pinto-Gouveia. Rumination in Adolescence:the Distinctive Impact of Brooding and Reflection on Psychopathology. Span J Psychol, 2016, 19:E37
27 Vandenberg RJ, CE Lance. A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature:Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 2000, 3(1):4-70
28 Ghorpade JHK, Lackritz JR. The use of personality measures in cross-cultural research:a test of three personality scales across two countries. J Appl Psychol, 1999, 84(5):670-679
29 Hui CH, HC Triandis. Measurement in Cross-Cultural Psychology:A Review and Comparison of Strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1985, 16(2):131-152
30 Schmitt N, G Kuljanin. Measurement invariance:Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 2008, 18(4):210-222

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】