中国临床心理学杂志

反映能力问卷中文版的信效度研究

作者：唐秋萍许荣莫小恩陈纹左方舟鲍婷婷王旭梅

单位：1. 中南大学湘雅三医院长沙 410013 2. 中国医科大学盛京医院沈阳 110004

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(2):280-284

摘要：

目的：在大学生样本和临床样本中检验反映能力问卷中文版（Chinese Version of Reflective Function Ques-tionnaire， RFQ-C）的信度和效度。方法：选取657名大学生和134例临床心理科的来访者填写RFQ-C，其中114名大学生在间隔1-2周后完成RFQ-C重测；采用人格障碍诊断问卷第4版中的边缘性人格障碍分量表、基本共情量表及多伦多述情障碍量表作为效标。结果：①大学生样本中，反映能力的Cronbach's α系数为0.654，重测信度为0.687；反映能力与边缘性人格倾向存在显著负相关（r=-0.180）。②临床样本中，反映能力的Cronbach's α系数为0.715；边缘性人格倾向组反映能力得分显著低于非边缘性人格倾向组，反映能力与边缘性人格倾向（r=-0.304）、述情障碍量表总分（r=-0.382）及其中的情感识别困难（r=-0.433）、情感描述困难（r=-0.311）均存在显著负相关；反映能力与认知共情相关显著（r=0.173）。结论：反映能力问卷中文版的信度和效度基本达到心理测量学的要求。

Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of Reflective Function Questionnaire (RFQ-C) in college students and counseling patients. Methods: 657 college students and 134 counseling patients completed the RFQ-C and a battery of self-reported questionnaires assessing borderline traits, alexithymia and empathy. Results: In college students, the Cronbach's α coefficient of the RFQ-C was 0.654, the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.687. Significant negative correlations were found between the total score of RFQ-C and borderline trait(r=-0.180). In counseling patients, the Cronbach's α coefficient of the RFQ-C was 0.715. Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder(BPD) tendency had significantly lower total scores of RFQ-C than patients without BPD tendency and the total score of RFQ-C was negatively correlated with borderline traits(r=-0.304), alexithymia(r=-0.382) & positively correlated with empathy(cognitive empathy only, r=0.173). Conclusion: Chinese Version of Reflective Function Questionnaire shows good reliability and validity and meets the needs of psychometric properties.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Bateman AW, Fonagy P. Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder:mentalization-based treatment. Oxford University Press, 2004
2 Fonagy P, Target M, Steele H, et al. Reflective-functioning manual:version 5 for application to adult attachment interviews. Unpublished manual. London:University College, 1998
3 Katznelson H. Reflective functioning:a review. Clinic Psychology Review, 2014, 34(2):107-117
4 Ha C, Sharp C, Ensink K, et al. The measurement of reflective function in adolescents with and without traits. Journal of Adolescence, 2013, 36(6):1215-1223
5 Pedersen SH, Lunn S, Katznelson H, et al. Reflective functioning in 70 patients suffering from bulimia nervosa. European Eating Disorders Review, 2012, 20(4):303-310
6 Ekeblad A, Falkenstromöm. Reflective functioning as predictor of working alliance and outcome in the treatment of depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2016, 84(1):67-78
7 Fonagy P, Sleed M, Baradon T. Randomized controlled trial of parent-infant psychotherapy for parents with mental health problems and young infants. Infant Mental Health Journal, 2016, 37(2):97-114
8 Stacks AM, Muzik M, Wong K, et al. Maternal reflective functioning among mothers with childhood maltreatment histories:links to sensitive parenting and infant attachment security. Attachment & Human Development, 2014, 16(5):515-533
9 Meehan KB, Levy KN, Reynoso JS, et al. Measuring reflective function with a multidimensional rating scale:comparison with scoring reflective function on the AAI. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 2009, 57:208-213
10 王倩, 杨蕴萍. 创伤后应激障碍症状与心智化能力缺损的相关性分析. 增刊. 中国医学杂志, 2011, 124(2):185
11 Perkins A. A new self-report measure of mentalization:The Reflective Function Questionnaire. Presented at the UK Conference of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Ravenscar, UK, 2010
12 Perkins A. Development and validation of a new self-report measure of mentalization:The 54-item Reflective Function Questionnaire. Presented at the SPR/BACP Conference, Liverpool, UK, 2011
13 Sharp C, Williams L, Ha C, et al. The development of a mentalization-based outcomes and research protocol for an adolescent in-patient unit. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 2009, 73:311-338
14 杨蕴萍, 杨坚. 人格障碍诊断问卷(PDQ-4+)在中国应用的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2002, 10(3):165-168
15 蚁金瑶, 姚树桥, 朱熊兆. TAS-20中文版的信度、效度分析. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2003, 17(11):763-767
16 李晨枫, 吕锐, 刘洁, 等. 基本共情量表在中国青少年群体中的初步修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2011, 19(2):163-166, 183
17 Badoud D, Luyten P, Fonseca-Pedrero E, et al. The French version of the reflective functioning questionnaire:validity data for adolescents and adult and its association with nonsuicidal self-injury. PLoS One, 2015, 10(12):e0145892
18 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务-SPSS操作与应用. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010
19 Fonagy P, Target M. Playing with reality, Ⅲ:the persistence of dual psychic reality in borderline patients. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 2000, 81:853-874
20 Fonagy P, Luyten P, Moulton-Perkins A, et al. Development and validation of a self-report measure of mentalizing:The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. PLoS One, 2016, 11(7):e0158678
21 Fischer-Kern M, Buchheim A, Hörz S, et al. The relationship between personality organization, reflective functioning, and psychiatric classification in borderline personality disorder. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 2010, 27(4):395-409
22 Gullestad FS, Johansen MS, Høgland P, et al. Mentalization as a moderator of treatment effects:findings from a randomized clinical trial for personality disorders. Psychotherapy Research, 2012. 1-16
23 Fischer-Kern M, Fonagy P, Kapusta ND, et al. Mentalizing in female inpatients with major depressive disorder. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 2013, 201(3):202-207
24 张春雨, 张进辅, 张静秋, 等. 述情障碍成因的认知及社会机制. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(3):398-409

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】