中国临床心理学杂志

治疗效果评定量表在中国大学生群体中的信效度检验

作者：佘壮孙启武江光荣

单位：1. 华中师范大学心理学院暨湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室武汉 430079 2. 上海应用技术大学大学生心理健康教育中心上海 201418

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(2):272-275

摘要：

目的：检验治疗效果评定量表（ORS）中文版的信度和效度。方法：分别从临床和非临床大学生群体中进行取样并收集数据。非临床样本为武汉市两所高校的202名大学生，该样本连续4次（间隔一周）同时施测OQ-45和ORS中文版问卷，以此检验ORS的信效度；利用参与某高校心理咨询的245名新当事人检验ORS对心理干预的敏感性。结果：ORS的内部一致性在0.80以上；连续4次测量结果显示，ORS一周后的重测信度为0.80~0.84；ORS与OQ-45中文版的相关为-0.60~-0.59；ORS的得分能够有效区分临床群体与非临床群体，且对心理干预足够敏感。结论：ORS中文版具有良好的心理学测量属性，可用于测量中国大学生当事人的心理治疗效果。

Objective: To validate the Chinese version of Outcome rating scale(ORS). Methods: Both clinical and nonclinical subjects were recruited in the current study. The nonclinical group consisted of 202 undergraduate and graduate students, who received four measures in a month(once a week) for examining the reliability and validity. Clinical group is made up of 245 clients from a university counseling center, this sample was used to examine the sensitivity to change of ORS in those clients receiving psychotherapy intervention. Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of ORS was above 0.80. The one-week test-retest reliability was 0.80-0.84 for the ORS total score. The correlations between OQ-45 total score and ORS total score were in range of -0.60~-0.59. The ORS effectively distinguished dysfunctional and functional clients, and had good responses to psychotherapy intervention. Conclusion: The ORS is a reliable and valid measure for Chinese university student and sub-clinical clients.

基金项目：

教育部人文社科青年基金项目（13YJC190021）资助；2016年国家社科基金重大投标项目：国民心理卫生素养及其提升机制与对策（16ZDA232）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Howard KI, Moras K, Brill PL, et al. Evaluation of psychotherapy:Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. American Psychologist, 1996, 51(10):1059-1064
2 Lambert MJ, Burlingame GM, Umphress V, et al. The reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 1996, 3(4):249-258
3 Miller SD, Duncan BL, Brown J, et al. The outcome rating scale:A preliminary study of the reliability, validity, and feasibility of a brief visual analog measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 2003, 2(2):91-100
4 Evans C, Connell J, Barkham M, et al. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure:psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 2002, 180(1):51-60
5 McAleavey AA, Nordberg SS, Hayes JA, et al. Clinical validity of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms-62(CCAPS-62):Further evaluation and clinical applications. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2012, 59(4):575-592
6 Kraus DR, Seligman DA, Jordan JR. Validation of a behavioral health treatment outcome and assessment tool designed for naturalistic settings:The Treatment Outcome Package. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2005, 61(3):285-314
7 Lambert MJ, Shimokawa K. Collecting client feedback. Psychotherapy, 2011, 48(1):72-79
8 Lambert MJ, Whipple JL, Hawkins EJ, et al. Is It Time for Clinicians to Routinely Track Patient Outcome? A MetaAnalysis. Clinical Psychology Science & Practice, 2003, 10(10):288-301
9 Brown J, Dreis S, Nace DK. What really makes a difference in psychotherapy outcome? Why does managed care want to know? 1999
10 Kazdin AE. Methodology, design, and evaluation in psychotherapy research. 1994
11 Duncan BL, Reese RJ. Clinical and scientific considerations in progress monitoring:When is a measure too long? Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 2013, 54(2):135-137
12 Bringhurst DL, Watson CW, Miller SD, et al. The Reliability and Validity of the Outcome Rating Scale:A Replication Study of a Brief Clinical Measure. Journal of brief Therapy, 2003, 5(1):23-30
13 Reese RJ, Norsworthy LA, Rowlands SR. Does a continuous feedback system improve psychotherapy outcome? Psychotherapy:Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 2009, 46(4):418-431
14 Anker MG, Duncan BL, Sparks JA. Using client feedback to improve couple therapy outcomes:A randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2009, 77(4):693-704
15 Reese RJ, Toland MD, Slone NC, et al. Effect of client feedback on couple psychotherapy outcomes. Psychotherapy:Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 2010, 47(4):616-630
16 Boswell JF, Kraus DR, Miller SD, et al. Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice:Benefits, challenges, and solutions. Psychotherapy Research, 2015, 25(1):6-19
17 https://heartandsoulofchange.com/content/measures/download.php
18 李钰静, 骆宏. 心理咨询效果评估量表中文版的信度和效度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2009, 23(2):105-107
19 秦佑凤, 胡姝婧. 心理咨询效果问卷(OQ-45)在中国部分人群的试用报告. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2008, 16(2):138-140
20 Lambert MJ, Bergin AE. The effectiveness of psychotherapy. W:Bergin AE, Garfield SL, (Eds.). Handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change. New York:John Wiley, 1994. 143-189

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】