中国临床心理学杂志

经前期症状评定简表中文版在大学女生中的适用性

作者：钟明天雷小霞姚树桥蚁金瑶

单位：1. 华南师范大学心理学院心理应用研究中心广州 510631 2. 中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理研究中心长沙 410011

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2017,25(1):97-100

摘要：

目的：建立经前期症状评定简表（the shortened premenstrual assessment form，SPAF）的中文版，并检验其在女大学生中的适用性。方法：1549名女大学生完成了SPAF等自评量表，其中有123人间隔1个月第二次完成SPAF。结果：SPAF中文版总量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.89，三因子Cronbach's α系数在0.77~0.93之间；条目间平均相关系数总量表为0.35，三因子在0.31~0.50之间；间隔1个月的重测信度总量表为0.87，三因子在0.82~0.91之间。验证性因素分析的指标（GFI=0.95，AGFI=0.93，CFI=0.90，RMSEA=0.046；条目对因子负荷系数在0.37~0.81之间；各因子间的潜相关系数在0.43~0.69之间）均符合测量学要求。回归分析显示：月经不规律、高BMI值、吸烟及高应激得分是女大学生发生经前期综合征的危险因素。结论：经前期症状评定简表中文版具有良好的信、效度。月经不规律、吸烟、肥胖、高应激水平是经前期综合征发生的危险因素。

Objective: To develop a Chinese version of the shortened premenstrual assessment form (SPAF) and examine its psychometric properties in female Undergraduates. Methods: A sample of 1549 female undergraduate students finished SPAF and other self-report scales, and 145 of them finished the SPAF one month later. Results: The Cronbach's α coefficient of the SAIS was 0.89, and ranged from 0.77 to 0.93 for its three factors, The MIC was 0.35. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.87 for total scale and 0.82, 0.91, 0.91 for its three factors, respectively. The GFI (0.95), AGFI (0.93), CFI (0.91), and RMSEA (0.046) all met the criteria standards for adequacy of fit, as well as the factor loading coefficient of each item (0.37-0.81). Logistic regression analysis showed that irregular menstruation, smoking, high BMI and high stress scores were risk factors for PMS. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the SPAF is a reliable and valid measure for assessing PMS in Chinese female undergraduates. Irregular menstruation, smoking, obesity and high stress perception may be risk factors for PMS.

基金项目：

国家自然科学基金（81370034）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Biggs WS, Demuth RH. Premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. American Family Physician, 2011, 84:918-924
2 Dickerson LM, Mazyck PJ, Hunter MH. Premenstrual Syndrome. American Family Physician, 2003, 67:1743-1752
3 Feuerstein M, Shaw WS. Measurement properties of the calendar of premenstrual experience in patients with premenstrual syndrome. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2002, 47:279-289
4 Freeman EW, DeRubeis RJ, Rickels K. Reliability and validity of a daily diary for premenstrual syndrome. Psychiatry Research, 1996, 65:97-106
5 Halbreich U, Endicott J, Schacht S. Premenstrual syndrome:A new instrument for their assessment. Journal of Psychiatric Treatment & Evaluation, 1982, 4:l61-164
6 Halbreich U, Endicott J, Schacht S, Nee J. The diversity of premenstrual changes as reflected in the Premenstrual Assessment Form. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1982, 65:46-65
7 Budeiri DJ, Li Wan Po A, Dornan JC. Clinical trials of treatments of premenstrual syndrome:entry criteria and scales for measuring treatment outcomes. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994, 101:689-695
8 Allen SS, McBride CM, Pirie PL. The shortened premenstrual assessment form. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 1991, 36:769-772
9 Masho SW, Adera T, South-Paul J. Obesity as a risk factor for premenstrual syndrome. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2005, 26:33-39
10 郭锐,肖晶,杨晓来,等. 学生日常社会和学业事件量表中文版在大学生应用中的信度、效度分析. 中国健康心理学杂志,2009,7:876-879
11 Lee YT, Liu SI, Huang HC, Sun FJ, et al. Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the short form of Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire(Q-LES-QSF). Quality of Life Research, 2014, 23:907-916
12 章健民,石其昌,徐方中,等. 12项一般健康问卷假阳性和假阴性率及其相关因素. 中国心理卫生杂志,2010,24:116-121
13 Deuster PA, Adera T, South-Paul J. Biological, Social, and Behavioral Factors Associated With Premenstrual Syndrome. Archives of Family Medicine, 1999, 8:122-128
14 Wu M, Liang Y, Wang Q, et al. Emotion Dysregulation of Women with Premenstrual Syndrome. Scientific Report, 2016, 6:38501

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】