中国临床心理学杂志

“脆弱性”还是“可塑性”:差别易感性模型

作者：周荃¹ 肖晶¹ 何莉² 赵德懋¹ 邢淑芬¹

单位：1. 首都师范大学教育学院心理系北京 100048
2. 北京师范大学心理学院北京 100875

分类号：R395.6

出版年,卷(期):页码：2016,24(4):747-751

摘要：

素质-应激模型认为，部分个体具有与生俱来的“脆弱性”素质，比他人更易受到消极环境的负面影响。差别易感性模型却认为，一部分人是具有更高的发展“可塑性”而不是脆弱性，他们比其他人不仅更易受到不利环境的消极影响，也更易受到积极的、支持性环境的有利影响。首先，对比分析了素质-应激模型和差别易感性模型的基本观点；其次，论述差别易感性模型的理论基础和相关的实证研究；最后，讨论了差别易感性模型的已有研究存在的问题和未来研究的方向。

The diathesisstress model suggests that some individuals due to a "vulnerability" in their makeup,are more vulnerable than others to the negative effects of adversity.However,the differential susceptibility model considers that these "vulnerable" individuals are not only likely to be affected adversely by environmental stressors,but also more susceptible than others to positive environmental influences.In this context,after comparing the major view of the "differential susceptibility model" and the "diathesis-stress model",we discussed the theoretical foundations of differential susceptibility.Then,we documented extant empirical research on differential susceptibility.Finally,we summarized the limits and agendas for future research of differential susceptibility.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Rosenthal D. A suggested conceptual framework. The Genain Quadruplets:A Case Study and Theoretical Analysis of Heredity and Environment in Schizophrenia. New York:Basic Books, 1963. 505-516
2 Monroe SM, Simons AD. Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research:implications for the depressive disorders. Psychological Bulletin, 1991, 110(3):406-425
3 唐海波, 邝春霞, 姚树桥. 焦虑障碍的易感性-应激发展观综述. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2008, 16(2):222-224
4 王润程, 明庆森, 蒋雅丽, 等. 高中生生活事件与焦虑症状关系的追踪研究:神经质的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(4):615-618
5 Ellis BJ, Boyce WT, Belsky J, et al. Differential susceptibility to the environment:An evolutionary-neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 2011, 23(1):7-28
6 邱炳武, 王极盛. 抑郁研究中的素质压力理论述评. 心理科学, 2000, 23(3):361-362
7 Belsky J, Pluess M. Beyond diathesis stress:differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Psychological Bulletin, 2009, 135(6):885-908
8 Belsky J. Variation in susceptibility to environmental influence:An evolutionary argument. Psychological Inquiry, 1997, 8(3):182-186
9 Belsky J, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Van IJzendoorn MH. For better and for worse differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2007, 16(6):300-304
10 张璠, 陈杰, 李新影. BDNF Val66Met 基因多态性和温暖的教养方式对青少年抑郁的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 1(23):52-55
11 Pluess M, Belsky J. Vantage sensitivity:Individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 2013, 139(4):901-916
12 Belsky J. Differential susceptibility to rearing influence. Origins of the social mind:Evolutionary psychology and child development, New York. NY:Guildford, 2005. 139-163
13 Boyce WT, Ellis BJ. Biological sensitivity to context:I. An evolutionary-developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and Psychopathology, 2005, 17(2):271-301
14 Hartman S, Belsky J. An Evolutionary perspective on family studies:Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Family Process, 2015
15 Pluess M, Belsky J. Differential susceptibility to parenting and quality child care. Developmental Psychology, 2010, 46 (2):379-390
16 Kim S, Kochanska G. Child temperament moderates effects of parent-child mutuality on self-regulation:A relationshipbased path for emotionally negative infants. Child Development, 2012, 83(4):1275-1289
17 Aron EN, Aron A. Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, 73(2):345-368
18 Aron EN, Aron A, Davies KM. Adult shyness:The interaction of temperamental sensitivity and an adverse childhood environment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2005, 31(2):181-197
19 Acevedo BP, Aron EN, Aron A, et al. The highly sensitive brain:an fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others' emotions. Brain and Behavior, 2014, 4 (4):580-594
20 Slagt M, Dubas JS, Denissen JJ, et al. Personality traits as potential susceptibility markers:Differential susceptibility to support among parents. Journal of Personality, 2015, 83(2):155-166
21 Van De Wiel NM, van Goozen SH, Matthys W, et al. Cortisol and treatment effect in children with disruptive behavior disorders:a preliminary study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2004, 43(8):1011-1018
22 Obradovic' J, Bush NR, Stamperdahl J, et al. Biological sensitivity to context:The interactive effects of stress reactivity and family adversity on socioemotional behavior and school readiness. Child Development, 2010, 81(1):270-289
23 Van der Graaff J, Meeus W, de Wied M, et al. Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Moderates the Relation between ParentAdolescent Relationship Quality and Adolescents' Social Adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2015:1-13
24 Belsky J, Hartman S. Gene-environment interaction in evolutionary perspective:differential susceptibility to environmental influences. World Psychiatry, 2014, 13(1):87-89
25 马园园, 周荃, 邢淑芬. 家庭养育环境与儿童发展:差别易感性假说. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23:1931-1941
26 Zhang W, Cao Y, Wang M, et al. The dopamine D2 receptor polymorphism(DRD2 TaqIA) interacts with maternal parenting in predicting early adolescent depressive symptoms:Evidence of differential susceptibility and age differences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2015. 1-13
27 Propper C, Moore GA, Mills-Koonce WR, et al. Geneenvironment contributions to the development of infant vagal reactivity:The interaction of dopamine and maternal sensitivity. Child Development, 2008, 79(5):1377-1394
28 Chen J, Yu J, Liu Y, et al. BDNF Val66Met, stress, and positive mothering:Differential susceptibility model of adolescent trait anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2015, 34:68-75
29 Hayden EP, Klein DN, Dougherty LR, et al. The role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor genotype, parental depression, and relationship discord in predicting early-emerging negative emotionality. Psychological Science, 2010, 21(11):1678-1685
30 Jaekel J, Pluess M, Belsky J, et al. Effects of maternal sensitivity on low birth weight children's academic achievement:a test of differential susceptibility versus diathesis stress. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2015, 56 (6):693-701
31 van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. Differential susceptibility experiments:going beyond correlational evidence:Comment on beyond mental health. Differential Susceptibility Articles, 2012, 48(3):769-774
32 Vonderlin E, Pahnke J, Pauen S. Infant temperament and information processing in a visual categorization task. Infant Behavior and Development, 2008, 31(4):559-569
33 Jagiellowicz J, Xu X, Aron A, et al. The trait of sensory processing sensitivity and neural responses to changes in visual scenes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2011, 6:38-47
34 Beevers CG, Wells TT, Ellis AJ, et al. Association of the serotonin transporter gene promoter region(5-HTTLPR) polymorphism with biased attention for emotional stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2009, 118(3):670-681
35 杨娟, 张小崔, 姚树桥. 抑郁症认知偏向的神经机制研究进展. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(5):788-791
36 Del Giudice M, Ellis BJ, Shirtcliff EA. The adaptive calibration model of stress responsivity. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2011, 35(7):1562-1592
37 Sergerie K, Chochol C, Armony JL. The role of the amygdala in emotional processing:a quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2008, 32(4):811-830
38 Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van Ijzendoorn MH. Differential susceptibility to rearing environment depending on dopamine-related genes:New evidence and a metaanalysis. Development and Psychopathology, 2011, 23(1):39-52
39 Manuck SB, McCaffery JM. Gene-environment interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 2014, 65:41-70

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】