中国临床心理学杂志

社会情绪健康调查-初级版在中国儿童中的信、效度检验

单位：1. 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室中国科学院心理研究所北京 100101
2. 承德医学院心理学系承德 067000
3. 河北师范大学心理学系石家庄 050000
4. 中国科学院大学北京 100101

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2016,24(3):450-453

摘要：

目的：考察“社会情绪健康调查—初级版”在我国学龄儿童中的试用情况及其因素结构与信效度。方法：汉译该问卷，选取河北省1144名四至六年级小学生施测，以学校态度、学业成绩、青少年心理健康素质调查表-适应分量表、同伴提名和友谊质量问卷作为效标工具；间隔2周后，抽取4个班127名小学生重测。结果：探索性因素分析表明，该问卷包括感激、热情、乐观、坚持四个因素，累计解释55.61％方差变异量；验证性因素分析结果，RMESA=0.06，GFI=0.92，CFI=0.92，TLI=0.91，IFI=0.92；多组验证性因素分析表明，在部分条目测量等同的情况下，模型在男女生样本中具有不变性；量表的内部一致性系数与重测信度分别为0.91和0.75，各分量表的内部一致性系数为0.78~0.81，重测信度为0.71~0.81；除热情与学业成绩、乐观与学校回避相关不具有统计学意义外，其它各维度得分及总量表分与学校喜欢、学校回避、学业成绩、学习适应、人际适应、同伴接纳、信任与支持、陪伴与娱乐、肯定价值、亲密袒露与交流均显著相关。结论：社会情绪健康调查—初级版信效度良好，可以在中国文化背景下应用。

Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Social Emotional Health Survey-Elementary (SEHS-E) in Chinese Elementary School students.Methods: 1144 elementary school students from Grade 4 to Grade 6 were applied to the Chinese version of SEHS-P,127 of them participated the retest 2 weeks later.School Attitude Scales,Learning Scores,Adolescence Mental Health Diathesis Questionnaire-Adaptation Scale,Peer Nomination and Friendship Quality Questionnaire were chosen as the criteria-related validity instruments.Results: The exploratory factor analysis showed that SEHS-E consisted of four subscales:Gratitude,Zest,Optimism,Persistence;and the cumulative variance accounts was 55.61%.The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the hypothesized four-factor model.Multi-group CFA showed that the structure model were invariant between male and female samples with some invariant items.The internal consistencies of the SEHS-E and its subscales were 0.78~0.91.The test-retest reliabilities were 0.71~0.81.The scores of the SEHS-E were significantly associated with school learning,school avoidance,learning scores,learning adaption,interpersonal adaptation,peer acceptance,trust and support,accompany and entertainment,value affirmation,intimacy exposing and communication,except for enthusiasm and academic performance,optimism and school avoidance.Conclusion: Chinese Version of SEHS-E has satisfactory validity and reliability,can be used in Chinese Elementary School students.

基金项目：

河北省教育厅人文社会科学基金项目（SQ151162）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Masten AS, Cicchetti D. Developmental cascades. Development and Psychopathology, 2010, 22(3):491-495
2 Seligman ME. Learned optimism:How to change your mind and your life. Vintage, 2006
3 任俊,叶浩生. 西方积极心理学运动是一场心理学革命吗? 心理科学进展,2005,13(6):856-863
4 Park N, Peterson C. Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents:The development and validation of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Youth. Journal of Adolescence, 2006, 29(6):891-909
5 Ostaszewski K, Zimmerman MA. The effects of cumulative risks and promotive factors on urban adolescent alcohol and other drug use:A longitudinal study of resiliency. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2006, 38(3-4):237-249
6 Duckworth AL, Quinn PD. Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale(GRIT-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 2009, 91(2):166-174
7 Furlong MJ, You S, Renshaw TL, et al. Preliminary development of the positive experiences at school scale for elementary school children. Child Indicators Research, 2013, 6(4):753-775
8 Wilkins B, Boman P, Mergler A. Positive psychological strengths and school engagement in primary school children. Cogent Education, 2015, 2(1):1095680
9 Lee S, You S, Furlong MJ. Validation of the social emotional health survey-secondary for Korean students. Child Indicators Research, 2015:1-20
10 Ito A, Smith D C, You S, et al. Validation and utility of the social emotional health survey-secondary for Japanese students. Contemporary School Psychology, 2015:1-10
11 McNicholas CI. Victimized for being different:Young adults' recollections of bullying victimization in middle and high school. The University of Georgia, 2015
12 Lenzi M, Dougherty D, Furlong MJ, et al. The configuration protective model:Factors associated with adolescent behavioral and emotional problems. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2015, 38:49-59
13 邹泓,屈智勇,叶苑. 中小学生的师生关系与其学校适应. 心理发展与教育,2007,23(4):77-82
14 张大均,江琦.《青少年心理健康素质调查表》适应分量表的编制. 心理与行为研究,2006,4(2):81-84
15 Coie JD, Dodge KA, Coppotelli H. Dimensions and types of social status:A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 1982, 18(4):557-570
16 邹泓. 青少年的同伴关系发展特点、功能及其影响因素. 北京:北京师范大学出版社, 2003
17 汪海彬, 刘婷, 卢家楣, 等. 情绪加工量表在中国大学生中应用的信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(2):209-212
18 Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature:Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 2000, 3(1):4-70
19 杨文辉, 刘绍亮, 周烃, 等. 贝克抑郁量表第 2版中文版在青少年中的信效度. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(2):240-245
20 吴明隆. 结构方程模型-Amos的操作与应用. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010
21 侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. 结构方程模型及其应用. 教育科学出版社, 2004

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】