中国临床心理学杂志

简版无聊倾向量表在大学生群体中的试用

单位：1. 承德医学院承德 067000
2. 佳木斯大学学生工作部心理健康教研室佳木斯 154007

关键词：无聊倾向效度信度

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2016,24(6):1029-1033

摘要：

目的：在中国大学生群体中引入简版无聊倾向量表（Boredom Proneness Scale-Short Form，BPS-SF），并检验其信效度，用以评定我国大学生的无聊倾向。方法：调查了1030名大学生，收回有效问卷945份，用以评定中文简版BPS的结构效度、内部一致性信度和分半信度。另用多维状态无聊量表、Buss-Perry攻击问卷、自评抑郁量表和特质孤独量表在188名大学生中检验效标关联效度。4周后随机选取124名大学生进行重测，检验其重测信度。结果：中文简版BPS包括内部刺激和外部刺激2个因子，共12个条目；验证性因素分析结果显示2因素模型拟合良好（χ²/df=3.827，CFI=0.901，TLI=0.895，RMSEA=0.041，SRMR=0.048）；量表总分与状态无聊、身体攻击、言语攻击、敌意、愤怒、抑郁、特质孤独的相关系数在0.22~0.63之间；总量表及分量表的内部一致性信度为0.89、0.80、0.83，分半信度分别为0.82、0.74、0.71，重测信度分别为0.85、0.73、0.76；中国大学生的无聊倾向具有性别差异，男生在量表总分及外部刺激维度上得分显著高于女生。结论：中文简版BPS具有良好的效度和信度，可用于评估大学生的无聊倾向。

Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of the Boredom Proneness Scale-Short Form(BPS-SF) in university students. Methods: 1030 university students were asked to complete the Chinese version of the Boredom Proneness Scale-Short Form, in which 188 students were additional asked to complete the Multidimensional State Boredom Scale, Buss & Perry Aggression Questionnaire, Self-Rating Depression Scale and Trait Loneliness Scale. 124 students were followed to complete the Chinese version of BPS-SF after 4 weeks. Results: The Chinese version of BPS-SF consisted of 12 items, and exploratory factor analyses yielded two factors:internal stimulation and external stimulation. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the two-factor model of BPS-SF provided good fit with the data(χ²/df=3.827, CFI=0.901, TLI=0.895, RMSEA=0.041, SRMR=0.048). The Cronbach's α of all factors ranged from 0.80 to 0.89; the split-half reliabilities ranged from 0.71 to 0.82; the test-retest reliabilities ranged from 0.73 to 0.85. The BPS-SF was of good criterion validity as well. There were significant differences in the boredom proneness between gender. Conclusion: The Chinese version of BPS-SF is a valid and reliable instrument to assess the boredom proneness in Chinese university students.

基金项目：

河北省社会科学基金项目（HB13JY055）；河北省教育厅人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（SQ141020）；河北省高等学校人文社会科学研究重点项目（SD161089）；2016年佳木斯大学人文社会科学研究项目（2016JDXSZX05）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 周浩,王琦,董妍. 无聊:一个久远而又新兴的研究主题. 心理科学进展,2012,20(1):98-107
2 朱湘茹,张慧君,刘畅,等. 述情障碍和无聊倾向性在神经质与焦虑、抑郁之间的中介效应. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2009,23(5):345-348
3 Havermans RC, Vancleef L, Kalamatianos A, et al. Eating and inflicting pain out of boredom. Appetite, 2015, 85:52-57
4 赵宇,陈健芷,刘勇,等. 无聊倾向对大学生攻击行为的影响:特质愤怒和冲动性的多重中介效应. 中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(2):312-316
5 Fahlman SA, Mercer-Lynn KB, Flora DB, et al. Development and validation of the multidimensional state boredom scale. Assessment, 2013, 20(1):68-85
6 Ng AH, Liu Y, Chen JZ, et al. Culture and state boredom:A comparison between European Canadians and Chinese. Personality & Individual Differences, 2014, 75(75):13-18
7 Vodanovich SJ, Wallace JC, Kass SJ. A confirmatory approach to the factor structure of the Boredom Proneness Scale:evidence for a two-factor short form. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2005, 85(3):295-303
8 Ahmed SM. Psychometric properties of the boredom proneness scale. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1990, 71:963-966
9 Gana K, Akremi M. French adaptation and validation of the Boredom Proneness Scale(BP). Anne Psychologique, 1998, 98:429-450
10 Ahmed SM. Psychometric properties of the boredom proneness scale. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1990
11 Gordon A, Wilkinson R, McGown A, et al. The psychometric properties of the Boredom Proneness Scale:An examination of its validity. Psychological Studies, 1997, 42:85-97
12 Vodanovich SJ, Kass SJ. A Factor Analytic Study of the Boredom Proneness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1990, 55(1):115-123
13 Vodanovich SJ, Watt JD, Piotrowski C. Boredom proneness in African-American college students:A factor analytic perspective. Education, 1997, 118:229-336
14 Melton AM, Schulenberg SE. A confirmatory factor analysis of the Boredom Proneness Scale. Journal of Psychology, 2009, 143(5):493-508
15 刘勇,陈健芷,宋琳婷,等. 无聊倾向量表(BPS):中文版的结构、信度及效度. 中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(1):74-77
16 高普梅,杨世昌. 无聊倾向性量表在大学生中的信度效度分析. 新乡医学院学报,2014,31(2):114-116
17 Dursun P, Tezer E. Turkish Adaptation of The Boredom Proneness Scale Short-Form. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 84(3):1550-1554
18 李献云,费立鹏,张亚利,等. Buss和Perry攻击问卷中文版的修订和信效度. 中国神经精神疾病杂志,2011,37(10):607-613
19 刘勇,陈健芷,姜梦,等. 多维状态无聊量表中文版在中国大学生中的应用. 中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(4):558-561
20 吴洪辉,廖友国. 近十年大学生自评抑郁量表(SDS)调查结果的元分析. 宁波大学学报:教育科学版,2013,6:9-12
21 刘平. 状态与特质性孤独量表. 增刊. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1999. 289
22 Dahlen ER, Martin RC, Ragan K, et al. Boredom proneness in anger and aggression:effects of impulsiveness and sensation seeking. Personality & Individual Differences, 2004, 37(8):1615-1627
23 田志鹏,刘勇,滕召军. 中学生无聊倾向特点及其与自恋、主观幸福感的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(6):1062-1067
24 Sundberg ND, Latkin CA, Farmer RF, et al. Boredom in young adults gender and cultural comparisons. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1991, 22(2):209-223

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】