中国临床心理学杂志

反社会过程筛查表在国内青少年群体中的初步应用

单位：1. 广州大学教育学院心理系广州 510006
2. 中南大学湘雅二医院长沙 410011
3. 塔夫茨大学儿童研究与人类发展系美国
4. 广州大学心理测量与潜变量建模研究中心

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2016,24(6):1016-1020

摘要：

目的：评估反社会过程筛查表自评版（Antisocial Process Screening Device Self-Report Version，APSD-SR）在我国青少年群体的适用性及心理测量学特性。方法：在两个独立的中学生样本中（N₁=1067，N₂=368）对APSD-SR中文版的因子结构和内部一致性信度进行检验，同时采用多个效标工具进行效标关联效度检验。结果：对APSDSR18个项目进行探索性因素分析得到一个三因子结构模型：冲动、冷酷无情和自恋。该模型在随后的验证性因素分析中得到进一步验证（χ²=402.041，df=132，RMSEA=0.070，CFI=0.859，TLI=0.837），大部分项目因子载荷在0.5以上。APSD总分及三个因子具有良好的信度，alpha系数为：0.776、0.694、0.767和0.700。同时，APSD-SR总分及冲动和自恋因子与理论相关的效标存在显著的相关，然而冷酷无情因子得分与效标的关系存在问题。结论：除冷酷无情因子外，APSD-SR在国内青少年群体中具有可以接受的心理测量学特性。

Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Antisocial Process Screening Device Self-Report Version(APSD-SR) in adolescents. Methods: The Chinese version of APSD-SR was administeredto two samples of middle school students. Results: Both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis supported a three factor solution(Impulsivity,[IMP], Callous-Unemotional[CU], and Narcissism[NAR]. But APSD-SR fit not well(χ²=402.041,df=132, RMSEA=0.070, CFI=0.859, TLI=0.837), and the loadings of most items were higher than 0.50, the lowest was 0.357. Alpha for APSD-SR total and three factor scores were 0.776, 0.694, 0.767 and 0.700, respectively. APSD-SR total score positively correlated with YPI, ICU, and RPQ, and negatively correlated with BES. Conclusion: APSD-SR is one of the most popular tool of self-report using in adolescent psychopathicout of abroad, however, it still has some shortcoming when using in Chinese population, particularly the CU factor.

基金项目：

本研究受国家自然科学基金（31400904）、大学生创新训练项目（201511078067）、广州市属高校社科项目（1201431330）和广州大学新苗计划（2004-27）的资助、共青团湖南省委2016年度青少年状况和青少年工作研究课题（项目号：2016B21）

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Wang MC, Deng Q, Armour C, et al. The psychometric properties and factor structure of the Antisocial Process Screening Device self-report version in Chinese adolescents. Journal of Psychopathology & Behavioral Assessment, 2016, 37(4):553-562
2 Hare RD. A Research Scale for the Assessment of Psychopathy in Criminal Populations. Personality & Individual Differences, 1980, 1(2):111-119
3 Frick PJ, Bodin SD, Barry CT. Psychopathic traits and conduct problems in community and clinic-referred samples of children:further development of the psychopathy screening device. Psychological Assessment, 2000, 12(4):382-393
4 Oshukova S, Kaltiala-Heino R, Miettunen J, et al. Selfreported psychopathic traits among non-referred Finnish adolescents:psychometric properties of the Youth Psychopathic traits Inventory and the Antisocial Process Screening Device. Child & Adolescent Psychiatry & Mental Health, 2015, 9(1):1-11
5 Goodwin BE, Sellbom M, Salekin RT. Elucidating the Construct Validity of the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD) in a Sample of Young Adults. Journal of Psychopathology & Behavioral Assessment, 2014, 37(1):1-11
6 Fung AL, Gao Y, Raine A. The utility of the child and adolescent psychopathy construct in Hong Kong, China. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 2010, 39(1):134-140
7 Lu D, Hao W, Waldman ID. Measurement and Structural Invariance of the Antisocial Process Screening Device. Psychological Assessment, 2014, 26(2):598-608
8 Laajasalo T, Saukkonen S, Kivivuori J, et al. Brief report:Self-reported psychopathic-like features among Finnish community youth:Investigation of the factor structure of the antisocial personality screening device. Journal of Adolescence, 2014, 37(7):1185-1188
9 Pechorro P, Maroco J, Poiares C, et al. Validation of the portuguese version of the antisocial process screening deviceself-report with a focus on delinquent behavior and behavior problems. International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 2013, 57(1):112-126
10 Wied MD, Baan HVD, Raaijmakers Q, et al. Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Dutch Version of the Antisocial Process Screening Device. Journal of Psychopathology & Behavioral Assessment, 2014, 36(1):84-92
11 Van Baardewijk Y, Andershed H, Stegge H, et al. Development and Tests of Short Versions of the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory and the Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory-Child Version. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2010, 26(2):122-128
12 Frick, PJ. The Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits. New Orleans, LA:The University of New Orleans, 2004
13 Fung ALC, Raine A, Gao Y. Cross-cultural generalizability of the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire(RPQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 2009, 91(5):473-479
14 Darrick J, Farrington DP. Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence, 2006, 29(4):589-611
15 Geng Y, Dan X, Qin B. The Basic Empathy Scale:A Chinese Validation of a Measure of Empathy in Adolescents. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2012, 43(4):499-510
16 王孟成. 潜变量建模与Mplus应用. 重庆大学出版社, 2014
17 Dillard CL, Salekin RT, Barker ED, et al. Psychopathy in Adolescent Offenders:An Item Response Theory Study of the Antisocial Process Screening Device-Self Report and the Psychopathy Checklist:Youth Version. Personality Disorders Theory Research & Treatment, 2012, 4(2):101-120
18 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders(5th ed.). Washington, DC:Author, 2013
19 王孟成,邓俏文,张积标,等. 冷酷无情特质:儿童品行障碍新的标记变量. 中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(3):466-469

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】