中国临床心理学杂志

常用抑郁量表筛查我国青少年抑郁的效度和划界分

作者：杨文辉¹ 2 熊戈³

单位：1. 湖南师范大学心理学系长沙 410081
2. 湖南师范大学认知与人类行为湖南省重点实验室长沙 410081
3. 中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理研究所长沙 410011

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2016,24(6):1010-1015

摘要：

目的：检验常用抑郁量表即流调用抑郁量表（CES-D）和贝克抑郁量表第2版中文版（BDI-II-C）筛查我国青少年抑郁的效度和划界分。方法：5565名中学生（年龄：14.17±1.66）完成CES-D和BDI-II-C测试，其中634人[即CES-D总分≥20分（n=322）和<20分（n=312）]进一步完成了学龄期儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症问卷（K-SADS）诊断访谈。对完成访谈的青少年以美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第4版（DSM-IV）为标准做出抑郁障碍诊断，以此为效标，计算并比较CES-D和BDI-II-C在各自常规和最优划界分下筛查青少年抑郁症和所有抑郁障碍的效度。结果： ① CES-D以总分≥29和≥24分为最优划界分，分别筛查青少年抑郁症和所有抑郁障碍的敏感度为94%-97%，特异度为74%-79%，阳性预测值为21%-30%，接受者操作特征（ROC）曲线下面积（AUC）为0.88-0.91；BDI-II-C以总分≥28和≥15分为最优划界分，分别筛查青少年抑郁症和所有抑郁障碍的敏感度为91%-95%，特异度为80%-83%，阳性预测值为23%-35%，AUC为0.88-0.91。② CES-D在常规划界分下筛查青少年抑郁症（≥24分）和所有抑郁障碍（≥20分）的特异度（55%-70%）和阳性预测值（16%-20%）均小于最优划界分；BDI-II-C在常规划界分下筛查青少年抑郁症（≥29分）和所有抑郁障碍（≥14分）结果与最优划界分相似，除筛查所有抑郁障碍的敏感度（99%）优于最优划界分（95%）；③ CES-D筛查抑郁症和所有抑郁障碍的特异度均小于BDI-II-C。结论：两常用抑郁量表筛查我国青少年抑郁具有较好的效标效度，建议CES-D选用最优划界分，BDI-II-C选用常规划界分。

Objective: To examine the criterion validity and cutoff scores of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scales(CES-D) and the Chinese version of Beck Depression inventory Ⅱ(BDI-Ⅱ-C) for Chinese adolescents. Methods: A total of 5565 junior-and high-school adolescents completed the CES-D and BDI-Ⅱ-C. Diagnoses of major depressive disorder(MDD) and any other depressive disorders were made on the DSM-IV. Results: ① At the optimal cutoffs, the CES-D scores of ≥29 and ≥24, separately, for detecting adolescent MDD and any depressive disorder were with a sensitivity of 94% to 97%, a specificity of 74% to 79%, a positive predict value(PPV) of 21% to 30%, and an area under receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve(AUC) of 0.88 to 0.91. Similarly, the BDI-Ⅱ-C scores of ≥28 and ≥15, separately, for detecting adolescent MDD and any depressive disorder were with a sensitivity of 91% to 95%, a specificity of 80% to 83%, a PPV of 23% to 35%, and an AUC of 0.88 to 0.91. ② At the commonly used cutoffs of CES-D, the specificity of 55% to 70% and PPV of 16% to 20% were lower than those at the optimal cutoffs. Meanwhile, at the commonly used cutoffs of the BDⅢ-C, all index were similar to those at the optimal cutoffs. ③ When compared to the BDI-Ⅱ-C, the specificity of the CESD was lower. Conclusion: Depression scales show good criterion validity for screening adolescent depression. Neither the BDI-Ⅱ-C nor the CES-D could be used by themselves as methods for case ascertainments, although the BDI-Ⅱ-C is somewhat better than the CES-D as a screener. For detecting adolescent depression, the optimal cutoffs are suggested to be used for the CES-D and the common cutoffs to be used for BDI-Ⅱ-C in China.

基金项目：

本研究受到国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题-预防青少年抑郁的“认知疫苗”：注意偏向矫正训练作用及认知机制（BBA130016）资助

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Radloff LS. The CES-D scale:A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977, 1:385-401
2 American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Fourth edition. DSM-IV. Washington, DC:American Psychiatric Association, 1994
3 Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck depression inventory. San Antonio, TX:Psychological Corporation, 1996
4 陈祉妍,杨小冬,李新影. 流调中心抑郁量表在我国青少年中的试用. 中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(4):443-448
5 杨文辉,周烃,彭芳,等. 湖南省岳阳县青少年抑郁的流行病学调查. 中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(6):937-941
6 杨文辉,刘绍亮,周烃,等. 贝克抑郁量表第2版中文版在青少年中的信效度. 中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(2):240-245
7 Radloff LS. The use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 1991, 20(2):149-166
8 Flahault A, Cadilhac M, Thomas G. Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005, 58(8):859-862
9 Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, et al. Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children present and lifetime version(K-SADS-PL):Initial reliability and validity data. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 1997, 36(7):980-988
10 Kessler RC, Walters EE. Epidemiology of DSM-Ⅲ-R major depression and minor depression among adolescents and young adults in the National Comorbidity Survey. Depression and Anxiety, 1998, 7(1):3-14
11 Weissman MM, Sholomskas D, Pottenger M, et al. Assessing depressive symptoms in five psychiatric populations:A validation study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1977, 106(9):203-214
12 Myers JK, Weissman MM. Use of a self-report symptom scale to detect depression in a community sample. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1980, 137(9):1081-1084
13 Gotlib IH, Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR. Symptoms versus a diagnosis of depression:Differences in psychosocial functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1995, 63(1):90-100
14 Roberts RE, Lewinsohn PM, Seeley BS. Screening for adolescent depression:A comparison of depression scales. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 1991, 30(1):58-66
15 Yang H-J, Soong Wei-Tsuen, Kuo Po-Hsiu, et al. Using the CES-D in a two-phase survey for depressive disorders among nonreferred adolescents in Taipei:a stratum-specific likelihood ratio analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2004, 82(3):419-430
16 Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer, 1950, 3(1):32-35
17 Avenevoli S, Swendsen J, He JP, et al. Major depression in the national comorbidity survey-adolescent supplement:prevalence, correlates, and treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2015, 54(1):37-44
18 Carleton RN, Thibodeau MA, Michel JNT, et al. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale:A Review with a Theoretical and Empirical Examination of Item Content and Factor Structure. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8(3):e58067

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】