中国临床心理学杂志

决策能力量表在军校学员中的初步修订

作者：冯田彭家熙张家喜霍倩倩肖玮

关键词：决策决策能力因素分析信效度

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2015,23(6):1028-1031

摘要：

目的:开发适合中国文化环境的决策能力评估工具。方法:经决策能力量表版权所属机构授权,请有关专家对决策能力量表进行翻译及回译;选取军校学员420名,战士80名,进行验证性因素分析,另用剑桥赌博任务进行效标关联效度研究。结果:采用决策能力量表各分量表标准分进行验证性因素分析证实了6因子结构模型,与国外研究相一致。各分量表Cronbach α在0.625-0.840之间,间隔两个月的重测信度在0.44~0.78之间,各因素与总分的相关系数在0.437-0.689之间。效标关联效度研究发现,决策能力量表分数高低个体在剑桥赌博任务决策质量成绩以及风险调节能力成绩上差异显著。结论:修订后的决策能力量表在军校学员群体中应用具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为决策能力评价的测量工具。

Objective: The purpose of this study was to development the decision making tools for Chinese and examine its reliability and validity in Chinese cadets. Methods: The Adult Decision-making Competence was authorized to trans-late into Chinese version, translation and back-translation,expert assessment were used to work out the Chinese version of A-DMC. Totally 500 young military personnels completed the A-DMC in two studies, in which 420 cadets and 80 soldiers were further asked to complete Cambridge Gamble Task. Results: The final version of A-DMC consisted of 134 items, which was divided into 6 factors. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that it had good construct validity. Pearson correla-tion between the factors and the whole inventory were between 0.437~0.689,P <0.001. The Cronbach's α for the factors was between 0.625~0.840,P <0.001. In addition, results also showed that the A-DMC suited for Chinese cadets. Conclusion: Both the reliability and validity of A-DMC met the criteria of psychometrics, and it can be used as a tool to assess Chinese young soldier decision making competence for the future researches.

基金项目：

全军医学科技“十二五”重大项目“军人群体信息损伤预警与防护”(AWS13J003)资助

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Bruine de Bruin W, Parker AM, Fischhoff B. Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 92(5): 938-956
2 Parker AM, Fischhoff B. Decision-making competence: External validation through an individual-differences approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2005, 18: 1-27
3 Liberali J, Reyna V, Furlan S. Individual differences in numeracy and cognitive reflection, with implications for biases and fallacies in probability judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2012, 25: 361-381
4 Jozef Bavolar. Validation of the adult decision-making competence in slovak students. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2013, 8(3): 386-392
5 高静,吴晨曦,杨翔宇. 临床护士护理伦理决策能力现状及影响因素研究. 中华护理杂志,2013,6:488-491
6 王丽萍,蒋晓莲,王国蓉. 决策能力研究测评进展. 护理研究,2009,8(23):2069-2071
7 严万森,李纾,隋南. 成瘾人群的决策障碍:研究范式与神经机制. 心理科学进展,2011,19(5):652-663
8 刘陈陵,周宗奎. 成年初期大学生自主结构探索及量表编制. 中国临床心理学,2014,1(22):64-68

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】