设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
记忆暗示感受性的重复测试效应研究
作者:曹晓君1  涂燊1  陈旭2 
单位:1. 西华师范大学教育学院  南充637002 
2.
 西南大学心理学部  重庆400715 
关键词:记忆暗示感受性 重复测试 单一测试 自动加工 控制加工 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2015,23(6):980-984
摘要:

目的:考查记忆暗示感受性产生过程中是否存在重复测试效应及重复测试对记忆暗示感受性动态加工成分的作用。方法:运用延迟的提取错误范式和R/K/G范式相结合的研究方法。结果:重复测试对被试的记忆暗示感受性强弱影响不显著,但对于记忆暗示感受性产生过程中自动加工与控制加工成分贡献却存在显著影响。结论:重复测试虽然没有提高或降低被试的记忆暗示感受性,但却增加了被试错误再认的自信度及记忆暗示感受性的控制加工成分。

Objective: To investigate the repeated test effect of memory suggestibility and the effect of repeated test on dynamic processing components of memory suggestibility. Methods: Both Delayed retrieval errors and Remember/Know/ Guess paradigm were used in this study. Results: The repeated test had no effect on the intension of memory suggestibility, but had a significant effect on the contributions of automatic and controlled processes in memory suggestibility. Conclu-sion: Repeated test has no direct influence on memory suggestibility, but may increase the confidence of the false recogni-tion and the contribution of controlled processes in individuals.

基金项目:
本文得到四川省社会科学“十二五”规划2014年度项目“记忆暗示感受性在教学情景中的应用研究”(SC14E097)、西华师范大学博士科研基金启动项目“记忆暗示感受性的年龄效应研究”(13E009)支持
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 周楚. 错误记忆的理论与实践. 华东师范大学博士学位论文,2005
2 周丽华,刘爱伦. 儿童记忆受暗示性影响的研究综述. 心理科学进展,2003,11(5):534-540
3 Chan JCK, McDermott KB. The testing effect in recognition memory: A dual process account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2007, 33:431-437
4 Israel L, Schacter D. Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,1997, 4: 577-581
5 Verde MF. The retrieval practice effect in associative recognition. Memory and Cognition, 2004, 32: 1265-1272
6 Brainerd CJ, Payne DG, Wright R, Reyna VF. Phantom recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 2003, 48: 445-467
7 Tussing A, Greene R. False recognition of associates: How robust is the effect? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,1997, 4: 572-576
8 Chan JCK, Thomas AK, Bulevich JB. Recalling a witnessed event increases eyewitness suggestibility: The reversed testing effect. Psychological Science, 2009, 20: 66-73
9 Thomas AK, Bulevich JB, Chan JCK. Testing promotes eyewitness accuracy with a warning: Implications for retrieval enhanced suggestibility. Journal of Memory and Language,2010, 63: 149-157
10 Chan JCK, Langley M. Paradoxical effects of testing: Retrieval enhances both accurate recall and suggestibility in eyewitnesses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011, 37: 248-255
11 Chan JCK, Wilford MM, Hughes KL. Retrieval can increase or decrease suggestibility depending on how memory is tested: The importance of source complexity. Journal of Memory and Language, 2012, 67: 78-85
12 Foster JL, Huthwaite T, Yesberg JA, et al. Repetition, not number of sources, increases both susceptibility to misinformation and confidence in the accuracy of eyewitnesses. Acta Psychologica, 2012, 139: 320-326
13 Plancher G, Nicolas S, Piolino P. Influence of suggestion in the DRM paradigm: What state of consciousness is associated with false memory? Consciousness and Cognition, 2008,17: 1114-1122
14 Lindsay S, Hagen L, Read JD, et al. True photographs and false memories. Psychological Science, 2004, 15: 149-154
15 李宏英,连榕,翁洁. 预警、重复学习和反馈对错误记忆的影响——错误记忆的信号检测论分析. 心理科学,2008,31(6):1507-1509
16 Chan JCK, McDermott KB, Watson JM, Gallo DA. The importance of material-processing interactions in inducing false memories. Memory and Cognition, 2005, 33: 389-395
17 Yonelinas AP. The nature of recollection and familiarity: a review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language,2002, 46: 441-456
18 Seamon JG, Luo CR, Gallo DA. Creating false memories of words with or without recognition of list items: Evidence for nonconscious Processes. Psychological Science, 1998, 9: 20-26
19 Roediger HL, McDermott KB. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1995,21: 803-814
20 Schacter DL, Reiman E, Curran T, et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of veridical and illusory recognition memory: Evidence from positron emission tomography. Neuron, 1996, 17:267-274

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626