设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
行为和金钱的反馈效应比较
作者:余芬1  袁璐2  罗跃嘉3 
单位:1. 深圳大学心理系  深圳518060 
2.
 成都医学院基础医学院  成都610500 
3.
 深圳大学情绪与社会认知科学研究所  深圳518060 
关键词:行为反馈 金钱反馈 FN P300 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2015,23(6):959-962
摘要:

目的:通过任务分离,探讨行为反馈和金钱反馈的生理基础。方法:采用事件相关电位方法,让18名大学生完成猜测任务,比较行为结果(猜对、猜错)和金钱结果(得分、失分)的FN和P3成分。结果:①行为反馈效应体现在FN的FZ、FCZ、CZ位置,P300的FZ、FCZ、CZ、CPZ位置;②金钱反馈效应体现在P300的PZ位置。结论:与金钱反馈相比,行为反馈在大脑神经生理基础水平加工时间快、强度高、分布范围广,反映了在人类强化学习过程中,行为反馈可能是比金钱反馈更有意义的反馈信号。

Objective: To compare the feedback effects triggered by behavior result and reward(money) result. Meth-ods: With event-related potentials(ERP), the present study recruited 18 subjects in a gambling task, and feedback-related negativity(FRN) and P300 were recorded and analyzed. Results: ①The results showed significant differences as to FRN and P300 amplitude between behavioral feedback and reward feedback. ②Behavior feedback effect was significantly pre-sented on FN electric pole(Fz, FCz, Cz) and P300 electric pole(Fz, FCz, Cz, CPz). ③Reward feedback effect was significant-ly presented on PZ of P300 electric pole. Conclusion: Compared with reward feedback, behavior feedback may be more re-lated with faster, stronger and broader neurophysiological processing in the brain.

基金项目:
深圳大学人文社会科学青年教师扶持项目(编号:15QNFC22)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Thorndike EL. Laws and hypotheses for behavior. In: EL Thorndike, Animal intelligence. Darien CT : Hafner Publishing Co. 1911 /1970. 241-281
2 Barto AG, Sutton RS. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, by Sutton RS and Barto AG. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1999, 39: 360-360
3 Binner PR, Potter A, Halpern J. Workload levels, program costs, and program benefits: An output value analysis. Administration in Mental Health, 1976, 3(2) :156-165
4 Yeung N, Sanfey AG. Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience,2004, 24(28): 6258-6264
5 Hauser TU, Iannaccone R, Stampfli P, et al. The feedbackrelated negativity(FRN) revisited: new insights into the localization, meaning, and network organization. Neuroimage,2014, 84C: 159-168
6 Wofford JC, Goodwin VL. Effects of feedback on cognitive processing and choice of decision style. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, 75(16): 603-612
7 Thurlings M, Vermeulen M, Bastiaens T, et al. Understanding feedback: a learning theory perspective. Educational Research Review, 2013, 9: 1-15
8 Hajcak G, Holroyd CB, Moser, JS, et al. Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. Psychophysiology, 2005, 42(2): 161-170
9 Mars RB, De Bruijn ER, Hulstijn W, et al. What if I told you:‘You were wrong’? Brain potentials and behavioral adjustments elicited by performance feedback in a timeestimation task. In Ullsperger M, Falkenstein M(Eds.), Errors, Conflicts, and the Brain. Current Opinions on Performance Monitoring. MPI of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig,2004. 129-134
10 Katharina G, Oliver TW, Christian B. The impact of stress on feedback and error processing during behavioral adaptation. Neuropsychologia, 2015, 71: 181-190
11 Vander H, Boksem MA, Blom JH. The importance of failure: Feedback-related negativity predicts motor learning efficiency. Cereb Cortex, 2010, 20(7): 1596-1603
12 Chase HW, Swainson R, Durham L, et al. Feedback-related negativity codes prediction error but not behavioral adjustment during probabilistic reversal learning. J Cogn Neurosci,2011, 23(4): 936-946
13 Pfabigan DM, Alexopoulos J, Bauer H, Sailer U. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 2011, 48 (5): 656-664
14 Zhang D, He W, Wang T, et al. Three stages of emotional word processing: An ERP study with rapid serial visual presentation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,2014, 9(12): 1897-903

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com