中国临床心理学杂志

补偿性刻板印象激活对公平感的影响

作者：陶塑¹ 许燕² 袁灿灿¹

单位：1. 中国地质大学(北京)思想政治教育学院应用心理学研究所北京100083
2. 北京师范大学心理学院北京100875

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2015,23(4):647-650

摘要：

目的:探讨激活优势群体的消极特征和弱势群体的积极特征对民众公平体验的影响。方法:采用自编短文激活被试对贫、富群体在不同特征维度上的补偿或非补偿性刻板印象,随后用问卷测量公平感。结果:与非补偿条件相比,补偿性刻板印象激活条件下被试体验到更强的个人公平感,特征维度与激活条件间的交互作用不显著;激活热情维度上非补偿刻板印象的被试,其社会公平感显著低于其他条件下的被试。结论:补偿性刻板印象源于系统公正需求,能起到提升个人公平感和维护社会公平感的作用。

Objective: To explore the effect on justice perception of endowing negative characters with the rich and posi-tive characters with the poor. Methods: The activation of complementary stereotypes on different dimensions was conduct-ed by short passages, and then justice perception was measured. Results: Personal justice perception was higher in the complementary stereotypes activation condition, compared to the non-complementary condition regardless of the comple-mentary dimensions. Social justice perception was lower in non-complementary warmth condition than other conditions. Conclusion: Complementary stereotype plays a role in enhancing personal justice perception and maintaining social jus-tice perception.

基金项目：

北京市哲学社会科学规划项目(12SHC024);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2-9-2012-123)

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 熊青. 社会不公平感与情绪状况. 中国健康心理学杂志,2014,22(5):695-697
2 Cropanzano R, Byrne ZS, Bobocel DR, et al. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2001,58: 164-209
3 李靖宇,谢晓非,葛瑜. 小事件、大影响:公平感知觉与规则驾驶行为. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),2012,48(4):670-678
4 Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, et al. A model of(often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, 82(6): 878-902
5 张珊明,罗伏生,钟毅平,陈芸. 权力刻板印象及自我卷入的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(5):751-753
6 张珊明,钟毅平,罗伏生. 内隐权力刻板印象:基于IAT和 GNAT的测量. 中国临床心理学杂志,2015,23(1):56-59
7 Cuddy AJC, Fiske ST, Glick P. The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 92(4): 631-648.
8 卢长宝,林阳阳,段奕君. 社会比较意义下嫉妒情绪的认知、情感及行为机制. 东南学术,2013,5:38-47
9 Jost JT, Banaji MR, Nosek BA. A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology,2004, 25(6): 881-919
10 杜建政,祝振兵,李兴琨. 大学生公正世界信念量表的初步编制. 中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(3):239-241
11 Kay AC, Jost JT. Complementary justice: Effects of“poor but happy”and“poor but honest”stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 85 (5): 823-837
12 Lipkus IM, Dalbert C, Siegler IC. The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1996, 22(7): 666-677
13 周浩,龙立荣. 公平感社会比较的参照对象选择研究述评. 心理科学进展,2010,18(6):948-954
14 周春燕,郭永玉. 家庭社会阶层对大学生心理健康的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志,2013,21(4):636-640
15 翁定军. 阶级或阶层意识中的心理因素:公平感和态度倾向. 社会学研究,2010,1:85-110
16 李路路,唐丽娜,秦广强.“患不均,更患不公”——转型期的“公平感”与“冲突感”. 中国人民大学学报,2012,4:80-90
17 宋淑娟,刘华山. 反刻板印象信息对减弱数学-性别刻板印象威胁效应的作用. 中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(3):386-389

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】