设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
老年人死亡恐惧量表的编制
作者:徐晟1  闫灿灿1  吴捷1  周雪梅2  吴梦瑄3 
单位:1. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院  天津300074 
2.
 北京师范大学出版社  北京100875 
3.
 南开大学外国语学院  天津300071 
关键词:老年人 死亡恐惧 信度 效度 
分类号:R395.1
出版年,卷(期):页码:2015,23(1):7-12
摘要:

目的: 编制老年人死亡恐惧量表,用以评估我国老年人的死亡恐惧状况。方法: 参考国外相关量表,结合中国文化的特点,并在访谈的基础上编制量表。方便选取516名老年人进行施测,通过项目分析和验证性因素分析确定量表的最终题目。另选取55名老年人间隔3周进行重测(有效50人)。采用死亡态度描绘量表修订版(DAPR)计算聚合效度和区分效度,采用Templer死亡焦虑量表(T-DAS)作为效标。结果: 最终量表共25个题目,包括身体疾病恐惧、虚无未知恐惧、影响他人恐惧和人际关系恐惧4个维度; 量表的拟合指数为: χ2/df =4.52,RMSEA=0.08,GFI=0.84,AGFI=0.81,NFI=0.94,NNFI=0.94,CFI=0.95,IFI=0.95; 各个维度以及总量表与死亡态度描绘量表的死亡恐惧维度的相关均大于与其他维度的相关; T-DAS与自编量表总分呈显著正相关(r =0.50,P <0.001),与4个维度分也均呈现正相关(r =0.34-0.56, 至少P <0.05)。总量表的Cronbach α信度,分半信度,重测信度,合成信度,RT和RΛ分别为0.92,0.88,0.87,0.95,0.42 和0.95,各维度的Cronbach α信度为0.77-0.87,分半信度为0.72-0.84,重测信度为0.78-0.86,合成信度为0.77-0.88,RT为0.36-0.47,RΛ为0.78-0.88。结论: 本研究编制的老年人死亡恐惧量表具有可接受的信效度,可供我国老年人死亡恐惧的研究和实际应用。

Objective: To develop the Fear of Death Scale for the Aged(FDA), for assessing fear of death in Chinese old man or woman. Methods: With the method of making reference to exiting foreign similar scales, and interviewing experts, the scale was constructed and tested in 516 Chinese old people. Item analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to determine the final scale. Another sample of 55 older people(50 valid) was tested and retested 3 weeks later. The convergent validity and discriminant validity were calculated with the Death Attitude Profile-Revised(DAP-R), and the criterion validity was test with the Templer's Death Anxiety Scale(T-DAS). Results: The final scale had 25 items and 4 dimensions,including fear of body and disease(BD), fear of nihility and unknown(NU), fear of influencing others(IO), and fear of interpersonal relationship(IR). Fit indexes of Confirmatory factor analysis were: χ2/df =4.52, RMSEA=0.08, GFI=0.84, AGFI=0.81, NFI=0.94, NNFI=0.94, CFI=0.95, IFI=0.95. The correlation between each dimension of FDSSC and the dimension of fear of death in DAP-R was greater than the correlation between each dimension of FDA and the other dimensions of DAP-R. The T-DAS total score was positively correlated with total score of FDA(r =0.50,P <0.001) and each dimension of FDA(range 0.34-0.56,Ps <0.05). Cronbach α of the whole scale was 0.92, and range 0.77-0.87 for each dimension; split-half reliability of the whole scale was 0.88, and range 0.72-0.84 for each dimension; the test-retest reliability was 0.87, and range 0.78- 0.86 for each dimension; composite reliability of the whole scale was 0.95, and range 0.77-0.88 for each dimension; RT of the whole scale was 0.42, and ranged 0.36-0.47 for each dimension; RΛ of the whole scale was 0.95, and ranged 0.78-0.88 for each dimension. Conclusion: It suggests that the FDA has acceptable reliability and validity, and could be used for relevant research and applications on fear of death for the aged.

基金项目:
教育部新世纪人才资金资助(2013年)
作者简介:
参考文献:

1 Lester D. Experimental and correlational studies of the fear of death. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 67(1): 27-36
2 Collett LJ, Lester D. The fear of death and the fear of dying. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 1969, 72(2): 179-181
3 Lester D, Abdel-Khalek A. The Collett-Lester fear of death scale: A correction. Death Studies, 2003, 27(1): 81-85
4 Hoelter JW. Multidimensional treatment of fear of death. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979, 47(5): 996-999
5 Florian V, Kravetz S. Fear of personal death: Attribution, structure, and relation to religious belief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44(3): 600-607
6 Wu A, Tang CS, Kwok TC. Death anxiety among Chinese elderly people in Hong Kong. Journal of Aging and Health, 2002, 14(1): 42-56
7 Tang CS- K, Wu AM, Yan EC. Psychosocial correlates of death anxiety among Chinese college students. Death Studies, 2002, 26(6): 491-499
8 Hui VK-Y, Fung HH. Mortality anxiety as a function of intrinsic religiosity and perceived purpose in life. Death Studies, 2008, 33(1): 30-50
9 魏骅,尤吾兵. 传统伦理文化的根由——儒家文化对死亡认识的四个维度. 学术界,2012,11: 65-73,283
10 毕治国.“未知死,焉知生”——中国古代死亡观探究. 黑龙江社会科学,2003,4: 18-23
11 靳凤林. 先秦儒道死亡思想之比较. 孔子研究,2002,5: 52-59
12 崔华华,刘霞. 以老庄为代表的道家死亡观研究. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,39(5): 19-21
13 海波. 从“重生轻死”到“生死齐一”——道家死亡观的哲学维度. 哲学研究,2008,1: 70-75
14 海波. 死亡学视域中的佛教研究. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,38(1): 150-153
15 Gesser G, Wong PT, Reker GT. Death attitudes across the life-span: The development and validation of the Death Attitude Profile(DAP). OMEGA——Journal of Death and Dying, 1987, 18(2): 113-128
16 廖芳娟. 台湾警察之死亡态度研究. 嘉义: 南华大学,2000
17 吴丽玉,林旭龙,吕昌明. 护理学院学生死亡态度之研究. 康宁学报,1999,3: 83-106
18 颜淑慧. 台湾地区护专学生死亡态度与生死教育需求之探讨. 嘉义: 南华大学,2002
19 马国亮. 护理学校学生死亡态度现状研究. 郑州: 郑州大学,2006
20 陈四光,安献丽. 436名大学生死亡态度分析. 中国心理卫生杂志,2009,23(4): 303-304
21 焦杰,任小红,黄伶智,陈丽. 医学专业与非医学专业大学生死亡态度的比较. 护理研究(上旬版),2012,26(10): 2621-2623
22 Templer D I. The construction and validation of a death anxiety scale. The Journal of General Psychology, 1970, 82(2): 165-177
23 杨红. 死亡焦虑量表的跨文化调适及其应用的研究. 北京: 北京中医药大学,2011
24 陈四光,金艳,郭斯萍. 西方死亡态度研究综述. 国外社会科学,2006,1: 65-68
25 叶宝娟,杨强. 用验证性因子分析估计单维测验的信度. 教育测量与评价: 理论版,2012,11: 8-12
26 齐林华. 中国古代文化中的身体观念及其发展. 长沙: 湖南师范大学,2013
27 李隆基注. 邢昺疏. 孝经注疏. 北京: 北京大学出版社,1999
28 张再林. 意识哲学,还是身体哲学. 世界哲学,2008,4: 12-17
29 黄盈盈,鲍雨. 经历乳腺癌: 从“疾病”到“残缺”的女性身体. 社会,2013,33(2): 185-207
30 郑红刚,朴炳奎. 浅议放化疗毒副作用的中医病. 中国中医基础医学杂志,2007,13(10): 751-752
31 杨国枢. 中国人的性格与行为: 形成及蜕变. 中华心理学刊,1981,23(1): 39-55
32 杨国枢. 中国人的社会取向: 社会互动的观点: 杨国枢,余安邦. 中国人的心理与社会行为——理念及方法篇. 台北: 巨流图书公司,1993. 87-142
33 李亦园,杨国枢,文崇. 现代化与中国化论集. 桂冠图书,1985

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com