中国临床心理学杂志

大学生在人格问卷测谎量表上的得分与反应时的关系

作者：白湘云¹ 2 王文忠¹ 罗跃嘉¹ 3

单位：1. 中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室北京 100101
2. 中国科学院研究生院北京 100048
3. 北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室

关键词：测谎量表反应时神经质精神质

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2006,14(6):588-590

摘要：

目的:探索大学生在人格问卷测谎量表上的得分与反应时之间的关系,并且验证测谎量表得分与其他人格维度的关系。方法:采用“艾森克人格问卷”和“眀尼苏达多相人格测试”中的测谎量表,对132名高校学生进行测查。结果:大学生在测谎量表上的得分与反应时间存在正相关(P＜0.05),测谎量表得分高的被试反应时间显著长于得分低的被试的反应时间(P＜0.01)。此外,测谎量表的得分与神经质存在负相关(P＜0.01),与精神质存在负相关(P＜0.01)。结论:本研究发现了反应时与测谎量表得分的关系,为直接测量手段引入传统量表测验做了一定的铺垫。

Objective:To explore the relationship between college students' lie scale scores of personality questionnaire and response latency,and verify relationship between lie scale scores and other dimensionalities of personality.Methods:132 college students were examined by the lie scales of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire.Results:There was significantly positive correlation between scores on lie scales and response latency(P＜0.05);college students who got high scores on lie scales had longer response latency than the low ones(P＜0.01);and it also presented a negative correlation in the relationship between the lie scale scores and both Neuroticism(P＜0.01)and Psychoticism(P＜0.01).Conclusion:This newly discovered correlation between lie scale scores and response latency could be taken as a good base for adopting the means of direct measurement into traditional scales.

基金项目：

中国科学院重要方向项目(KSCX2-SW-221)的部分工作

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] Greenwald AG,Banaji MR.Implicit social cognition:Attitudes,self-esteem,and stereotypes.Psychological Review,1995,102:4-27
[2] Spence SA,Farrow TFD,Herford AE,Wilkinson ID,Woodruff PWR.Behavioral and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans.Neuroreport:For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research,2001,12:2849-2853
[3] Barker L,Stern JA,Goldstein R.The gaze control system and the detection of deception.Fort Jackson,SC:Department of Defense Polygraph Institute,1990
[4] Chris JJ,Leslie JF.Interpreting the correlation between neuroticism and lie scale scores.Personality and Individual Differences,1999,26:59-63
[5] Martin FD,Christopher CF,Edmund K.Self-deceptive enhancement and impression management correlates of EPQR dimensions.The Journal of Psychology,1998,132 (4):401-406
[6] Judd CM,McClelland GH.Data analysis:A modelcomparison approach.Orlando,FL:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,1989
[7] Mandler,G.Mind and emotion.New York:Wiley
[8] Nisbett RE,Wilson TD.Telling more than we can know:Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review,1977,84:231-259
[9] John NB.Meta-Judgmental Versus Operative Indexes of Psychological Attributes:The case of Mesures of Attitude Strength.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1996,71(4):637-653
[10] Higgins ET.Beyond pleasure and pain.American Psychologist,1997,52:1280-1300
[11] 王文忠,曲如杰,卢丹蕾.大学生调节倾向与行为意向及后悔情绪的关系.中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):50-52
[12] John NB,B.Stacey Scott.Response latency as a signal to question problems in survey research.Public Opinion Quarterly Volume,60:390-399
[13] 陈仲庚.艾森克人格问卷简式量表中国版(EPQ-RSC)的使用手册.北京大学心理学系印,1998

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】