设为首页 | 加入收藏
网站首页 本刊简介 编委会 投稿指南 过刊浏览 广告合作 网上订购 下载专区 联系我们  
江苏省SCL-90-R常模的建立
作者:曹婧媛1  傅文青2  吴鹏飞1  陈旦丹1  姚雷1  安永博1  陈竹2 
单位:1. 苏州大学附属第一医院  江苏 苏州 215006 
2.
 苏州大学医学部临床心理学研究所  江苏 苏州 215123 
关键词:SCL-90-R 常模 江苏 
分类号:B841.7
出版年,卷(期):页码:2009,17(6):681-683
摘要:

目的:通过对随机抽取的786名18-60周岁江苏省普通人群进行调查,建立江苏省SCL-90-R常模。方法:采用SCL-90-R中译本,按标准化程序进行现场问卷调查。结果:SCL-90-R各因子分除了人际敏感因子与1986年常模无显著差异外,其他八项因子都显著高于1986年常模(P<0.001);男女之间具有差异性的因子数有所减少;各年龄组之间仅躯体化因子差异显著。不同受教育程度人群中躯体化、强迫症状、人际敏感、抑郁、恐惧等因子的差异有统计学意义,且小学及以下受教育程度组的各因子分均高于其他组。结论:1986年的全国常模已失去参考价值,有必要对江苏省普通人群的SCL-90-R均值及标准差建立一个新的参照标准。

Objective:To establish Symptom Check List 90 Revised(SCL-90-R)norm of common adults of Jiangsu province by surveying 786 people aged between 18 and 60 sampled at random.Methods:SCL-90-R was used for subjects using questionnaire method with standardized test.Then statistical analysis of the acquired valid data was carried out.Results:All scores of factors in SCL-90-R were strikingly higher than those of the norm of 1986 except the scores of interpersonal sensitivity factor in this sample(P<0.001).The amount of factors showing differences between male and female are decreasing.Compared with the norm of 1986,the contrast among different age groups had some change.The scores of somatization,obsessive compulsive,interpersonal sensitivity,depression,photic anxiety were the highest in the group of education level of elementary school and below.Conclusion:The norm of 1986 has lost its reference value and it's necessary to establish a novel reference standard of the SCL-90-R in common adults of Jiangsu province.

基金项目:
作者简介:
参考文献:

[1] Derogatis LR.SCL-90:Administration,scoring,and procedure manual-I for the R(revised)version.Baltimore:John Hopkins University,School of Medicine,1977
[2] Hardt J,Gerbershagen HU,Franke P.The symptomchecklist,SCL-90-R:Its use and characteristics in chronic pain patients.Eur J Pain,2000.4,137-148
[3] Schmitz N,Kruse J,Heckrath C,Alberti L,TressW.Diagnosingmental disorders in primary care:The General Health Questionnaire(GHQ)and the Symptom Check List(SCL-90-R)as screening instruments.Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol,1999,34:360-366
[4] Cunha I,Brissos S,Dinis M,Mendes I,et al.Comparison between the results of the Symptom Checklist -90 in two different populations with temporal lobe epilepsy.Epilepsy Behav,2003,4:733-739
[5] Aben I,Verhey F,Lousberg R,Lodder J,Honig A.Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory,Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale,SCL-90,and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as screening instruments for depression in stroke patients.Psychosomatics,2002,43:386-393
[6] 汪向东,王希林,马弘,主编.心理卫生评定量表手册.增订版.中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.31-35
[7] 王征宇.症状自评量表.上海精神医学,1984,2:68-70
[8] 金华,吴文源.中国正常人 SCL-90评定结果的初步分析.中国神经精神疾病杂志,1986,12:260-262
[9] 唐秋萍,程灶火,袁爱华,等.SCL-90在中国的应用与分析.中国临床心理学杂志,1999,7(1):16
[10] 刘恒,张建新.我国中学生症状自评量表(SCL-90)评定结果分析.中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(2):88-90
[11] 陈树林,李凌江.SCL-90信度效度检验和常模的再比较.中国神经精神疾病杂志,2003,29(5):323
[12] 王金道.SCL-90量表使用的现状及检测心理健康的异议.中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(1):15-17
[13] 许清鹏,陈龙,裴华,等.不同群体 SCL-90评定结果的比较.中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(2):171-175

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【加入收藏
您是第访问者

《中国临床心理学杂志》编辑部
地址:湖南省长沙市中南大学湘雅二医院内, 410011
电 话:0731-85292472    电子邮件:cjcp_china@163.com