中国临床心理学杂志

美德形容词评定量表的编制及其信效度研究

作者：沐守宽¹ 顾海根²

单位：1. 漳州师范学院教育系福建漳州 363000
2. 上海师范大学心理系上海 200234

关键词：美德评定量表信度效度

分类号：B841

出版年,卷(期):页码：2010,18(3):310-313

摘要：

目的：编制美德形容词评定量表，并检验其信度与效度。方法：采用心理词汇学方法，筛选美德形容词项目，运用探索性因素分析方法确立美德的因子结构，并建立美德形容词评定量表，通过信度分析、相关分析和验证性因素分析等方法检验量表的信效度。结果：筛选出109个形容词，构成美德形容词评定量表：探索性因素分析剔除19个形容词后，剩余的90个形容词项目可以由诚善仁厚、勤谨务实、机智干练、自立自强、沉稳理性5个分量表和14个子量表构成，解释总变异的46.37%。分量表和子量表的内部一致性系数为0.75-0.95，分半信度为0.74-0.90，重测信度为0.44-0.75，自评-他评的相关为-0.13-0.42，符合理论预期：量表具有很好的结构效度，与Cawley的美德形容词调查表及16PF调查表的相关分析也证明了量表具有很好的效标效度。验证性因素分析指出三阶模型的各项参数(χ2/df=3.15，RMSEA=0.072，IFI=0.943，CFI=0.943，NNFI=0.941)均达到理想模型的要求。结论：该量表具有较好的信度与效度，但仍需要多种测量方法加以验证。

Objective:To develop the virtue adjectives rating scale and to test the reliability and validity of the scale.Methods:Adjectives describing virtues were selected through the psycholexical approach.Psychological structure of the virtues and the virtue adjectives rating scale was established by means of exploratory factor analysis;reliability analysis and correlation analysis were used to test the internal consistency reliability,split reliability,test-retest reliability,construct validity and criterion-related validity;and confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare fitness of the models.Results:109 adjectives describing virtues were selected through the psycholexical approach.By exploratory factor analysis,19 items were deleted;the 90 adjectives items left could be explained by 5 big scales and 14 subscales with a 46.37 percent contribution to the variance.All the scales' internal consistency reliability,split reliability,test-retest reliability and the correlation coefficient were 0.75-0.95,0.74-0.90,0.44-0.75,-0.13-0.42 respectively.The result showed that the scale was high in validity as convergent validity,discriminant validity and criterion-related validity;and confirmatory factor analysis validated the three class model.Conclusion:The virtue adjectives rating scale had good reliability and validity;its effectiveness need to be tested through other approaches.

基金项目：

作者简介：

参考文献：

[1] 宋希仁,陈劳志,赵仁光,主编.伦理学大辞典.吉林人民出版社,1989.789
[2] Organ DW.The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior.Research in Organizational Behavior,1990,12:43-72
[3] Ashton MC,Lee K,Son C.Honesty as the sixth factor of personality:Correlations with Machiavellianism,primary psychopath,and social adroitness.Journal of European Personality,2000,14:359-368
[4] John OP,Angleitner A,Ostendorf F.The lexical approach to personality:A historical review of trait taxonomic res-earch.European journal of Personality,1988,2:171-203
[5] 张俊涛,陈毅文,田树军,等.青少年品行问题行为倾向问卷的初步编制.中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(3):321-323
[6] 亓圣华,张彤,李繁荣,等.中学生羞耻感量表的编制.中国临床心理学杂志,2008,16(6):599-601
[7] Cawley III MJ,Martin JE,Johnson JA.A virtues approach to personality.Personality and Individual Differences,2000,28:997-1013
[8] John OP,Angleitner A,Ostendorf F.The lexical approach to personality:A historical review of trait taxonomic research.European journal of Personality,1988,2:171-203
[9] Goldberg LR.Language and Indifferences:The search for universals in personality lexicons.Review of Personality and Social Psychology,1981,2:141-165
[10] 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室编.现代汉语词典(增补本).商务印书馆,2002
[11] Read BD.The big five personality factors:The psycholexical approach to personality.Hogrefe and Huber Publishers,2002.33-35
[12] Cawley Ⅲ MJ.The Virtues Scale:A psychological examination of the structure of virtue and the relationships between virtue,personality,moral development,and epistemological style.Doctoral dissertation,The Pennsylvania State University,1997

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】