中国临床心理学杂志

夫妻互动行为差异及其对婚姻质量的影响——基于一项观察研究

单位：1. 中国青年政治学院社会工作学院北京 100089
2. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所北京 100875
3. 浙江传媒学院杭州 310018

分类号：R395.1

出版年,卷(期):页码：2013,21(5):790-794

摘要：

目的：探索夫妻互动特点以及丈夫和妻子互动行为的相对差异对婚姻质量的影响。方法：采用问题解决和社会支持的研究范式,对41对新婚夫妇进行观察研究,采用爱荷华家庭互动编码体系(IFIRS)对其行为进行编码。结果：①在问题解决时,妻子的行为比丈夫更消极;丈夫比妻子更积极。在社会支持时,妻子的行为比丈夫更消极,积极行为没有差异。②在问题解决时,丈夫比妻子消极的组,妻子的婚姻质量显著低于妻子比丈夫消极的组。③在社会支持时,妻子的积极行为多于丈夫的组,比起那些丈夫的积极行为多于妻子的组,丈夫的婚姻质量更高。结论：在问题解决时,丈夫的消极行为比妻子的消极行为对妻子的婚姻质量更具破坏力;在社会支持时,妻子的积极比起丈夫的积极,对丈夫的婚姻质量更具正向影响力;丈夫冲突情境下的积极行为比社会支持情境中的积极行为对婚姻质量更有正向作用。

Objective: To explore the difference of interaction behaviors in couples and how these differences influence their martial relations. Methods: Using the problem-solving and social support paradigm, 41 couples have been videoed.IFIRS was used to code their behavior. Results: ①Wives were more negative than husbands in both problem solving and social support context, and less positive only in problem solving context. ②Wives were less satisfied with their marriage in the group which husbands displayed more negative behaviors, compared to the group in which wives displayed more negative behaviors than husbands in problem solving context; ③Husbands were more satisfied in the group which wives displayed more positive behaviors, compared to the group in which husbands displayed more positive behaviors than wives.Conclusion: Husbands' negative behavior were more destructive to wives' martial satisfaction comparing to wives' negativity in problem solving context. Furthermore, wives' positivity in social support context have more positive effect on husbands' martial satisfaction comparing to husbands' positivity. Husbands' positivity in problem solving context were more predictive to relationship quality than that in social support context.

基金项目：

教育部长江学者支持计划的资助

作者简介：

参考文献：

1 Karney BR, Bradbury TN. The longitudinal course of marit-al quality and stability: A review of theory method and re-search. Psychological Bulletin, 1995. 118(1): 3-34
2 Heyman RE. Observation of couple conflicts: Clinical ass-essment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky founda-tions. Psychological Assessment, 2001, 13(1): 5-35
3 Gottman JM. What predicts divorce? The relationship bet-ween marital process and marital outcomes. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum, 1994
4 Gottman JM, Coan J, Carrere S, et al. Predicting maritalhappiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journalof Marriage and the Family, 1998, 60(1): 5-22
5 Kim HK, Capaldi DM, Lynn C. Generalizability of gottmanand colleagues'affective process models of couples'rela-tionship outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 2007.69(1): 55-72
6 Ball ELJ, Cowan P, Cowan CP. Who's got the power? Gen-der differences in partner's perception of influence duringmarital problem-solving discussions. Family Process, 1995,34: 303-321
7 Schoebi D, Wang Z, Ababkov V, et al. Affective interdepen-dence in married couples'daily lives: Are there culturaldifferences in partner effects of anger? Family Science,2010, 1(2): 83-92
8 Kitayama S, Markus HR. The pursuit of happiness and therealization of sympathy: Cultural patterns of self, social rel-ations, and well-being. In Diener E, Suh EM. Cultural andSubjective Well-Being. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2000.113-161
9 Gottman JM. Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press, 1979
10 Pasch LA, Bradbury TN. Social support, conflict and thedevelopment of marital dysfunction. Journal of Consultingand Clinical Psychology, 1998, 66(2): 219-230
11 Melby J, Conger R, Book R, et al. The Iowa family interac-tion rating scales (5th ed). Unpublished Document, IowaState University, Institute for Social and Behavioral Rese-arch, 1998
12 Williamson HC, Bradbury TN, Trail TE, et al. Factor analy-sis of the Iowa family interaction rating scales. Journal ofFamily Psychology, 2011, 25(6), 993-999
13 Gottman JM, Notarius CI. Decade review: Observing marit-al interaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 2000, 62(4):927-947
14 McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some in-traclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods,1996, 1(1): 30-46
15 Norton R. Measuring marital quality: A critical look at thedependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family,1983, 45(1): 141-151
16 Christensen A, Heavey CL. Interventions for couples. An-nual Review of Psychology, 1999, 50(1): 165-190
17 Neff LA, Karney BR. Gender differences in social support:A question of skill or responsiveness? Journal of Personal-ity and Social Psychology, 2005, 88(1): 79-90
18 Gottman JM, Levenson RW. Marital processes predictive oflater dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journalof Personality and Social Psychology, 1992, 63(2): 221-233
19 徐安琪. 夫妻权力和妇女家庭地位的评价指标：反思与检讨. 社会学研究，2005，4：134-152
20 徐安琪. 女性的家务贡献和家庭地位. 见：孟宪范. 转型社会中的中国妇女. 北京：中国社会科学出版社，2004
21 徐安琪. 夫妻权力模式与女性家庭地位满意度研究. 浙江学刊，2004，2：
22 Melby JN, Ge X, Conger RD, et al. The importance of taskin evaluating positive marital interactions. Journal of Mar-riage and the Family, 1995, 57(4): 981-994

服务与反馈：

【文章下载】【加入收藏】